NFL Draft Picks...ARE YOU HAPPY WITH THEM?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Aug 26, 2002
855
0
0
#1
Personally i'm not all that impressed with whom the Raiders picked up. How do the rest of yall feel. I think that Baltimore had a pretty good draft...who else was there???
 
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
45
#3
Im content with my Niners picks, they werent all that great. The Texans are my #2 team and I am happy with their picks, they did a good job.
 
Aug 26, 2002
855
0
0
#6
I know how yall feel i mean when they show highlights of the players i dont seem all that impressed. then they try to throw some praise out there to compensate for the players each team drafted. maybe it's just me but this draft was kinda gay unless you picked up a Charles Rogers or a Newman. Names like that make me impressed. It's not that i'm pissed but i'm like who the fuck is this guy? That's not just for my team but i felt that way for a lot of teams.
 
May 19, 2002
4,860
0
0
www.cdbaby.com
#7
Oh yea I like our first 4 picks!! Newman will be a stud, while C Johnson, TE Whitten, & LB James will probably be starters as well!! Actually not sure about James startin right away, but our first 3 picks probably will start!! But ofcourse Newman will be the man!! Our secondary will be dope!! GOT EM!!
 
May 2, 2002
3,895
163
0
#9
Just because a team doesn't pick a house-hold name, doesn't mean they aren't good or won't do well.

It's all about filling a need and how well a player will fit in with your team.
 
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
45
#10
Thats true, and if you think about it, alot of stars today werent even picked in the first round. Terrell Owens for example wasnt picked up until the 3rd round by the 49ers and he is the best wide reciever in the game.
 
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
45
#12
How is a player who chooses what plays he wants to put an effort in better then any reciever? He had the almost the same rec/yds as Owens with 6 less touchdowns. You be the judge, I bet you the majority of coaches would take Owens over Moss.
 
Apr 25, 2002
3,413
0
0
#13
randy moss is not the best reciever in the league, in fact he's a horrible football player...that's not taking anything away from his athleticism, but any player that admits to only playing when he feels like playing shouldn't be on any team...
 
May 19, 2002
4,860
0
0
www.cdbaby.com
#14
Yall can say what yall want, but I aint talkin about his attitude!! Im sayin he is the most talented reciever in the league!! Yall wont change my mind so stop tryin!! Also fuck goin by 1 year, lets check him and Owens stats ever since Moss came into the league and I bet Moss's numbers are better, but regardless. Moss is the best reciever in my eyes!! Take it how u want, yall think what yall think, and I know what I know!! GOT EM!!
 
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
45
#15
KINGCZAR said:
Yall can say what yall want...Yall wont change my mind so stop tryin...yall think what yall think, and I know what I know!! GOT EM!!
Hahahahaha! Sorry, that shit just had me crackin up. Yo, Moss might have the most talent in the league, no one said otherwise. There are many players that have talent but don't live up to it. We are talknig about the best; that is determined by how they play on the field. Moss doesnt do better than every reciever. CB's and coaches used to fear Moss, thats not the case as much as it once was. That is now the case for Owens... oposing teams build there game plans around him. Right now he is the best WR in the NFL and yes that is my opinion. Why did I use this year? We can go back further if you want because this is Owens worst performance in the last 3 years. Owens had more yards then Moss in 2000 and played in 2 less games. Moss had about 40 more yards this past year in 2 more games played. Owens Touchdowns are better over the last 3 years by 10 touchdowns and the list goes on. I understand what your saying Czar and I don't disagree, but right now Owens is playing better therefore he is better. Once Moss takes the stick out of his ass and starts playing like a real player should, then it might be a different story.
 
Apr 25, 2002
1,617
30
48
#16
im gonna argue too........a coach would want NEITHER of them dudes on their team. Owens has one of the worst attitudes, an Moss does some stupid ass shit........in my oppinion Moss is better.......Owens can be took out the game too easy, all you have to do is hit him.........the broncos did it perfect last season, they let Kennedy crack his ass an he didnt do shit all game


I think I would take Marvin Harrison over both them dudes, he aint a punk, he aint selfish.........an most of all he is a TEAM player
 
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
45
#17
A coach who really wants to win isnt going to be as concerned with attitude as long as the performance of his players is as needed. Moss has been subpar to Owens outstanding performance over the last 3 years, the numbers speak for themselves. As for stopping Owens, I think your comment is cheap. Ask yourself one question, if it was that easy... why is Owens having his way with every team he faces? Just because he had a bad game against one team doesnt mean whatever formula they used is the key because in another game it could be an entirely different story.
 
Apr 25, 2002
1,617
30
48
#18
he has bad games when he gets hit period homie. the giants ruffed him up in the opener an he didnt do shit, Denver knocked him around an he did even worse.......


its like George Foreman says "everybody has a plan........until they get hit"
 
May 19, 2002
4,860
0
0
www.cdbaby.com
#19
Yall can ramble all yall wont to, but Moss is the best reciever in the league!! Yes he does some dumb off the field shit, and sometimes acts stupid on the field, but he is the best hands down!! Owens acts a fool sometimes to, but I dont base it on that!! I base it on talent and what they have done, and Moss has had down years the last 2 years, and still was up there with the best and made the probowl every year he has been in the league!! Owens may be #2 or 3 in my book at this point!!! GOT EM!!!
 
Apr 25, 2002
1,617
30
48
#20
here is Moss's stats since he came in


YEAR TEAM G GS Rec Yds Avg Lg TD 40+

1998 Minnesota Vikings 16 11 69 1313 19.0 61t 17 14
1999 Minnesota Vikings 16 16 80 1413 17.7 67t 11 8
2000 Minnesota Vikings 16 16 77 1437 18.7 78t 15 8
2001 Minnesota Vikings 16 16 82 1233 15.0 73t 10 4 2002 Minnesota Vikings 16 16 106 1347 12.7 60 7 6

TOTAL 6 NFL Seasons 80 75 414 6743 16.3 78t 60 40


Owens...............

YEAR TEAM G GS Rec Yds Avg Lg TD 40+
1996 San Francisco 49ers 16 10 35 520 14.9 46t 4 2
1997 San Francisco 49ers 16 15 60 936 15.6 56t 8 1
1998 San Francisco 49ers 16 10 67 1097 16.4 79t 14 4
1999 San Francisco 49ers 14 14 60 754 12.6 36 4 0
2000 San Francisco 49ers 14 13 97 1451 15.0 69t 13 5
2001 San Francisco 49ers 16 16 93 1412 15.2 60t 16 6
2002 San Francisco 49ers 14 14 100 1300 13.0 76t 13 5

TOTAL 8 NFL Seasons 106 92 512 7470 14.6 79t 72 23

Harrison..........

YEAR TEAM G GS Rec Yds Avg Lg TD 40+
1996 Indianapolis Colts 16 15 64 836 13.1 41 8 1
1997 Indianapolis Colts 16 15 73 866 11.9 44 6 2
1998 Indianapolis Colts 12 12 59 776 13.2 61t 7 2
1999 Indianapolis Colts 16 16 115 1663 14.5 57t 12 7
2000 Indianapolis Colts 16 16 102 1413 13.9 78t 14 4
2001 Indianapolis Colts 16 16 109 1524 14.0 68 15 6
2002 Indianapolis Colts 16 16 143 1722 12.0 69 11 4

TOTAL 8 NFL Seasons 108 106 665 8800 13.2 78t 73 26


so over the last 3 years Harrison been more productive in yards an catches, an all 3 are real close in tds