NEWS YOU WON'T FIND ON CNN - BUSH A LIAR?
- Thread starter Y-S
- Start date
is it a lie anymore if he did it to "protect national security" ?
i mean if there are known knowns, unknown unknowns, known unknowns, and unknown unknowns, then can't a lie not be a lie anymore as long as when you lie you think you're doing it for the right reasons?
what about if you lie and then lie again later saying your first lie was for the right reasons. do those lies cancel eachother out? or were they not even lies to begin with?
I guess it depends on what the meaning of is, is.
i mean if there are known knowns, unknown unknowns, known unknowns, and unknown unknowns, then can't a lie not be a lie anymore as long as when you lie you think you're doing it for the right reasons?
what about if you lie and then lie again later saying your first lie was for the right reasons. do those lies cancel eachother out? or were they not even lies to begin with?
I guess it depends on what the meaning of is, is.
1) Not under oath.
2) National Security.
If you have a problem with that, then go lobby to get the FOIA expanded to include EVERY SINGLE DOCUMENT EVER CREATED, HELD, MAINTAINED, ETC. by the Government. This would include the SS#, Home Address, Income, Who your Mom Fucked to Have you, Criminal Records, etc. of every single person on this forum.
Until then...continue to
and keep searching for Censurable/Impeachable offenses. Because you ain't found one yet, and probably won't.
2) National Security.
If you have a problem with that, then go lobby to get the FOIA expanded to include EVERY SINGLE DOCUMENT EVER CREATED, HELD, MAINTAINED, ETC. by the Government. This would include the SS#, Home Address, Income, Who your Mom Fucked to Have you, Criminal Records, etc. of every single person on this forum.
Until then...continue to
