New Zodiac Sign Dates: Ophiuchus The 13th Sign?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
DFresh77

DFresh77

Sicc OG
#1
Dec 4, 2006
17,451
7,543
113
48
#1
The New Dates:


Capricorn: Jan. 20 - Feb. 16
Aquarius: Feb. 16 - March 11
Pisces: March 11- April 18
Aries: April 18 - May 13
Taurus: May 13 - June 21
Gemini: June 21 - July 20
Cancer: July 20 - Aug. 10
Leo: Aug. 10 - Sept. 16
Virgo: Sept. 16 - Oct. 30
Libra: Oct. 30 - Nov. 23
Scorpio: Nov. 23 - Nov. 29
Ophiuchus: Nov. 29 - Dec. 17
Sagittarius: Dec. 17 - Jan. 20


--------------------------------------

I don't be believing in this shit...but I grew up as an Aries.......

me a Pisces? ...hell naw! never that!
 
0R0

0R0

Girbaud Shuttle Jeans
#2
Dec 10, 2006
15,436
20,287
0
35
BasedWorld
#2
You are a fucking retard if you let these white people try to change up things our ancestors have always known. Same with saying Pluto is not a planet, yes it fucking is.
 
Nuttkase

Nuttkase

not nolettuce
#6
Jun 5, 2002
38,763
159,575
113
45
at the welfare mall
#6
0R0 said:
You are a fucking retard if you let these white people try to change up things our ancestors have always known. Same with saying Pluto is not a planet, yes it fucking is.
Click to expand...
Actually by the definition that has always been around for what a planet is Pluto is not. They just weren't able to get close enough to it to tell until recently.

Changing up the signs (even though that shit is for women, weirdos, and faggots) was stupid but really who gives a fuck?
 
GHP

GHP

Sicc OG
#12
Jul 21, 2002
16,280
853
113
46
#12
adding a new sign basically debunks everything people thought they knew about astrology proving it to be phony boloney.
 
0R0

0R0

Girbaud Shuttle Jeans
#14
Dec 10, 2006
15,436
20,287
0
35
BasedWorld
#14
Nuttkase said:
Actually by the definition that has always been around for what a planet is Pluto is not. They just weren't able to get close enough to it to tell until recently.
Click to expand...
Orly?

2006: IAU classification

The debate came to a head in 2006 with an IAU resolution that created an official definition for the term "planet". According to this resolution, there are three main conditions for an object to be considered a 'planet':

1. The object must be in orbit around the Sun.
2. The object must be massive enough to be a sphere by its own gravitational force. More specifically, its own gravity should pull it into a shape of hydrostatic equilibrium.
3. It must have cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit.

Pluto only failed to meet the third criteria, in a classification brought forth in 2006. It was then labeled a dwarf planet, a completely new category they made up on the spot.

There has been some resistance within the astronomical community toward the reclassification. Alan Stern, principal investigator with NASA's New Horizons mission to Pluto, has publicly derided the IAU resolution, stating that "the definition stinks, for technical reasons." Stern's contention is that by the terms of the new definition Earth, Mars, Jupiter, and Neptune, all of which share their orbits with asteroids, would be excluded. His other claim is that because less than five percent of astronomers voted for it, the decision was not representative of the entire astronomical community
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom