Music Publishers Demand More, iTunes Risks Closing

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

CoopDVill

Super Moderator
May 4, 2003
10,518
6,091
113
48
www.facebook.com
#1
Rolling Stone has reported that the National Music Publishers' Association (NMPA) is seeking a 66 percent increase on royalty rates for digital music sales on iTunes.

The royalty rate increase would raise royalty's from nine cents per track to 15 cents per track.

If NMPA's request is granted, iTunes would have no choice but to raise their 99 cents a song pricing.

Instead of increasing pricing, iTunes has made threats to shutdown their services if NMPA's request is approved.

"If the [iTunes music store] was forced to absorb any increase in the...royalty rate, the result would be to significantly increase the likelihood of the store operating at a financial loss - which is no alternative at all," iTunes Vice President Eddy Cue said in a statement. "Apple has repeatedly made it clear that it is in this business to make money, and most likely would not continue to operate [the iTunes music store] if it were no longer possible to do so profitably."

Although a mass shutdown of iTunes seems quite unlikely, the increase on royalty's would mostly likely take a toll on product sales for Apple products and sales on iTunes.
 

Sydal

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,232
170
63
43
www.idealsentertainment.com
#2
WTF? I get something like 86 cents per song from iTunes. Yea, 'cause every time a full album sells I get $8.60.

This has to be bogus.

I'm sick of all these greedy fucks in the music industry. "WAAAAA, WE'RE NOT SELLING RECORDS FOR $20 A POP ANYMORE, OUR PROFIT MARGIN WENT WAY DOWN, BOOOO". If you want artists to make more money, tell 'em to relate to their fans and stop putting one good song on each album.
 

Doxx

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
5,280
18
0
strivin.com
#4
WTF? I get something like 86 cents per song from iTunes. Yea, 'cause every time a full album sells I get $8.60.

This has to be bogus.

I'm sick of all these greedy fucks in the music industry. "WAAAAA, WE'RE NOT SELLING RECORDS FOR $20 A POP ANYMORE, OUR PROFIT MARGIN WENT WAY DOWN, BOOOO". If you want artists to make more money, tell 'em to relate to their fans and stop putting one good song on each album.
It's real. You're thinking they're talking about the total money paid out per song. This increase is ONLY for the portion that the music publishers get. That's where the confusion is coming from.

Basically, Apple pays out about .70 cents per .99 cent download to the record company. The record company then pays out .09 cents to the music publisher. The National Music Publishers Association is requesting that the music publishers cut be bumped up to .15 cents.

The record companies don't want more of their profit taken out to cover the publishers increase so instead they want Apple to either raise the .99 cent price or have the increase be taken from Apples per song profits. Apple does not want to do either of those things.

As far as I know this actually affects other online music stores as well, so it's not just an iTunes issue.
 

Sydal

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,232
170
63
43
www.idealsentertainment.com
#6
It's real. You're thinking they're talking about the total money paid out per song. This increase is ONLY for the portion that the music publishers get. That's where the confusion is coming from.

Basically, Apple pays out about .70 cents per .99 cent download to the record company. The record company then pays out .09 cents to the music publisher. The National Music Publishers Association is requesting that the music publishers cut be bumped up to .15 cents.

The record companies don't want more of their profit taken out to cover the publishers increase so instead they want Apple to either raise the .99 cent price or have the increase be taken from Apples per song profits. Apple does not want to do either of those things.

As far as I know this actually affects other online music stores as well, so it's not just an iTunes issue.
The publishers need to shut their asses up. Publishers get paid off radio play and public performance of whatever songs they published. If they are talking about the writers of the songs, they need to go back and look at their contracts. If the contracts are there, which they should be, they can negotiate later when it's time to renew contracts. Fact of the matter is, they get a percentage of sales, based on how much the product costs. If the product is 99 cents per download, they are only entitled to their percentage and can't DEMAND an increase in price from the label or any retailer. Fuckin GREED!