Missile involved into WTC?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Y-S

Sicc OG
Dec 10, 2005
3,765
0
0
#1
Extract from The Parade Magazine interview.

Q:
This is a question that's been asked by many Americans, but especially by the widows of September 11th. How were we so asleep at the switch? How did a war targeting civilians arrive on our homeland with seemingly no warning?

~ Rumsfeld: There were lots of warnings. The intelligence information that we get, it sometimes runs into the hundreds of alerts or pieces of intelligence a week. One looks at the worldwide, it's thousands. And the task is to sort through it and see what you can find. And as you find things, the law enforcement officials who have the responsibility to deal with that type of thing -- the FBI at the federal level, and although it is not, it's an
investigative service as opposed to a police force, it's not a federal police force, as you know. But the state and local law enforcement officials have the responsibility for dealing with those kinds of issues.

They (find a lot) and any number of terrorist efforts have been dissuaded, deterred or stopped by good intelligence gathering and good preventive work. It is a truth that a terrorist can attack any time, any place, using any technique and it's physically impossible to defend at every time and every place against every conceivable technique. Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filed with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center. The only way to deal with this problem is by taking the battle to the terrorists, wherever they are, and dealing with them.

Well wow, thanks for letting know.

http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2001/t11182001_t1012pm.html
 
#3
1) he was referencing the Pentagon. 2) I believe he was putting this false info out there to get people believe something other than than a plane hit the building so that they could be discredited at a later date thus discrediting the whole meovement. This is what was done during DA Jim Garrison's trial of Clay Shaw for the assassination plot of JFK.

Ask yourself a few question. WHY would they use a missle and have to fabricate bodies/kill the victims later anyway, when using a plane with the "victims" would be easier.

That's the only problem with conspiracy theories of big events such as 9/11. They end up theorizing wild opinions which have no basis in fact. There were no "pods" on the planes that hit the WTC, there was no missle that hit the pentagon, there was no "hologram" at the WTC, flight 93 was shot down not switched at a earlier time in Clevland. Other than the WTC which has some pretty strong pysical evidence and just common sense sowing it was imploded, the other events of that day will probably never be known as to how they were pulled off and by who the the men getting their hands dirty were. We can show that there was government (and specifically Bush administration) involvement through public documents, memos and statements. You will never convince the public of that though trying to prove theories by using physical evidence. That's because both sides will have their "specialists" who will testify both ways and the public will be spit on who to believe which won't solve anything. Just look at the JFK assination to see what will happen. There was a clear cut film of him getting shot from the front and to this day people belive Oswald was the lone shooter from behind.
 
#5
I've talked about this in another post. Here are some links of what it looks like when a fight jet crashes into a concrete wall.

link1
link2

Planes only make perfect outlines when crashing through objects in the cartoons. Use common sense when looking at events like these. Yes there was, by definition, a conspiracy with 9/11. But just because some one put up a webpage doen't mean their theory is valid or holds any water. A lot of the theories are so far fetched as to be comical. It is a waste of time to try to figure out exactly what did or did not hit the Pentagon. We will never know for sure unless the government decides to release high quality security tapes which may end up implicating themselves. That is highly unlikely to happen. Unless the whole Pentagon issue is a honeypot, in which case they will pull out the tapes at the right moment and the whole movement will be discredited.

There is more than enough evidence to show the government was deeply involved in bringing 9/11 about and is enough to bring charges in a criminal court. The bad news is no one in the position to file charges is willing to actually due the patriot and right thing and start the process. It may have to come to a revolution to have the truth be known. Unforetunatly since this doesn't touch the average citizen's lives directly in a tangable way (outside the erosion of civil liberties) that won't happen soon.
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,283
113
#6
What it comes down to...is "who saw what"....the "eye witnesses" at the Whitehouse were ALL over the place with "what happened"....no to mention all the theories that revolved around everything....

Did a PLANE hit the Pentagon?Hell no....

Did a missle hit it?Maybe...

Did it just get bombed fromt he inside?Very likely...

Point is....there is a reason why there is a term called "conspiracy throey"....cuase thats what it is....a thought of what MIGHT have happened...but only the ones that mastermind this bullshit knows for sure...and i can almost guarntee...we as a NATION....will NEVER know the EXACT truth of what happened that day....

Just know that 95% of what the CONTROLLED media has told you....is complete and utter BULLSHIT....
 
#7
Oh Coy!Ocerto said:
What it comes down to...is "who saw what"....the "eye witnesses" at the Whitehouse were ALL over the place with "what happened"....no to mention all the theories that revolved around everything....

Did a PLANE hit the Pentagon?Hell no....

Did a missle hit it?Maybe...

Did it just get bombed fromt he inside?Very likely...

Point is....there is a reason why there is a term called "conspiracy throey"....cuase thats what it is....a thought of what MIGHT have happened...but only the ones that mastermind this bullshit knows for sure...and i can almost guarntee...we as a NATION....will NEVER know the EXACT truth of what happened that day....

Just know that 95% of what the CONTROLLED media has told you....is complete and utter BULLSHIT....
The evidence leans toward a plane hitting the pentagon. Firing a missle at the pentagon and having to kill the passengers of the supposed flight SEPARTELY is a very involved convoluted plan which would be completely unneccesary when the same end could be met by just crashing the original flight into the building. If you were to try to pull this off which way would you go? A more complicated way which envolves controlling what the whole public in the area of the incident would see and allows for more ways to fail? Or a simpler, easier plan which is more likely to reach its intended goal without failure? That's my point.

And since, as you say, 95% of the media is BS how creadable are those interviews? If you believe everthing the media says is BS than you can't use any of their footage to backup a theory.

But if you really think that a missile hit the pentagon that's your prerogative. I just feel its a honeypot and a waste of time to argue either way when the end result is the same...the government was involved and their is evidence linking them to it. We'll never find out the specifics so that is a waste of energy for the movement.
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,283
113
#8
Eternal Designs said:
And since, as you say, 95% of the media is BS how creadable are those interviews? If you believe everthing the media says is BS than you can't use any of their footage to backup a theory.
Thats my point....but you cant fake the crash site...thats in plain view of the camera....

But if you really think that a missile hit the pentagon that's your prerogative.
When did i say that?I said "maybe"...this goes with the "throey" threory...you dont know anymore or less than myself....no point in arguing when cant be proven...werent those youre words to me in another thread?

I just feel its a honeypot and a waste of time to argue either way when the end result is the same...the government was involved and their is evidence linking them to it. We'll never find out the specifics so that is a waste of energy for the movement.
Thats the business....
 
#10
Oh Coy!Ocerto said:
you dont know anymore or less than myself....no point in arguing when cant be proven...werent those youre words to me in another thread?
True, I just think people waste so much time and energy on the specifics of how when they already have the who, what when and where, which could produce actual progress in bring those involved to justice. That's all. Its like if someone breaks into your house and steals all yo shit ans leaves evidence linking back to who they are. Do you really need to know exactly how they broke in to know they did it and to get justice?
 

Cmoke

Sicc OG
May 10, 2002
3,391
4
38
41
#11
when you are taking the united states government on against they're own system i think u need every single miniscule detail you can get.....think about it.