I am a Running Back enthusiast, I know what LT can do. Like I said before he's my favorite RB in the league today, but people seem to be threatened of Gore's presence because as soon as I said he was better than LT at breaking tackles dude got all defensive of LT and couldn't fathom the thought of Gore doing something better than LaDainian.
I'm not talking about who has more broken tackles. It's quite obvious to anyone who watches games that LT goes down easier than Frank Gore once he gets wrapped up or hit. I don't care if LT can elude the tackler and therefor does not need to break off a tackle, I'm talking about the fact that when Gore and LT get caught by a defender, Gore has a better chance of getting away from it. Go watch film, and if you still honestly think I'm wrong I will not continue to waste my time.
I am not someone who just watches highlights of LT, I watch him every chance I get. I watch Gore every single week. I know what each is capable of and I know that LT is the better RB. But the arguement I'm making is obvious to anyone who isn't having fantasies of jerking LT off while hanging from his ball sac.
Exactly.
Dude's over there acting like I'm trying to discredit LaDainian. But I think the real reason this turned into such a debate is because Frank Gore is the other back in the discussion. If I had said some other back breaks tackles better than LT, nobody would have said shit.
People are mad because Frank Gore is already being brought up in the same sentence as LaDainian Tomlinson.