lol @ this mock draft..

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Chree

Chree

Medicated
#1
Dec 7, 2005
32,404
13,935
113
40
#1
SF: 1st round QB Brian Brohm, 2nd Round RB Felix Jones
Oak: 1st Round RB Darren Mcfadden, 2nd Round traded to ATL
SD: 1st Round DE Quentin Groves, 2nd Round traded to MIA
Dal: 1st Round RB Jonathan Stewart, 1st Round FS Kenny Phillips, 2nd Round CB Tracy Porter
SEA: 1st Round DE Philip Merling, 2nd Round TE Fred Davis


Notables
RB Ray Rice in 2nd to TB, WR Mario Manningham in 2nd to WAS, LB Dan Connor to CAR in 2nd, WR Malcom Kelly in 2nd to MIA, WR Early Doucet in 2nd to STL, WR James Hardy in 2nd to NYJ, WR Desean Jackson in 1st to Jax,


http://nfldraft.rivals.com/nfldraft.asp?Round=1
http://nfldraft.rivals.com/nfldraft.asp?Round=2

doesnt sound right to me... and LOL @ saying SF gonna take a qb in the 1st, and a RB in the 2nd, terrible....
 
REdRUM

REdRUM

Sicc OG
#4
Aug 12, 2002
10,103
24
0
www.veronicamoser.com
#4
Chree said:
thats what im saying at the least, and taking a qb in the 1st is laughable too.....
Click to expand...

Whoever did that probably noticed they didn't have a QB who has given them anything to be positive about...

The RB pick...Gore doesn't need to worry about his job, but they could use a decent backup, but I think that high, when they have other needs is far fetched.

A WR, perhaps? Or even a QB in the second (instead of the first)...
 
REdRUM

REdRUM

Sicc OG
#6
Aug 12, 2002
10,103
24
0
www.veronicamoser.com
#6
Chree said:
The same can be said about the Raiders.......
Click to expand...
Come on; I wasn't talking shit, don't be such a pussy about it.

REdRUM said:
Whoever did that probably noticed they didn't have a QB who has given them anything to be positive about...
Click to expand...
LOL...he's still basically a rookie, but if he plays most of the snaps this year and next, and hasn't done anything positive, then the same can be said about him as Alex Smith (bust).

REdRUM said:
The RB pick...Gore doesn't need to worry about his job, but they could use a decent backup, but I think that high, when they have other needs is far fetched.
Click to expand...
If they picked up McFadden, they'd be set (at RB), but they do have more pressing needs, and don't need a RB as much as many other positions, so yes, this can be said about the Raiders, too.

REdRUM said:
A WR, perhaps? Or even a QB in the second (instead of the first)...
Click to expand...
Yes, the Raiders can use a WR; a QB, definately, but could pick up a decent QB via free agency or a late round pick, to be a backup.





LOL...you act like I was scoffing at your dumb post, ya' big dummy. LOL...don't be so quick to catch feelings; you're acting like a female, cupcake.
 
Chree

Chree

Medicated
#7
Dec 7, 2005
32,404
13,935
113
40
#7
REdRUM said:
Come on; I wasn't talking shit, don't be such a pussy about it.
Click to expand...
Neither was I.....


REdRUM said:
LOL...he's still basically a rookie, but if he plays most of the snaps this year and next, and hasn't done anything positive, then the same can be said about him as Alex Smith (bust).
Click to expand...
In 2005, Alex Smiths Rookie Year, He Started 7 games, with a shitty OC, and No weapons on offense, only a budding Frank Gore, but having Barlow in neutralized that, and added more harm, His 2nd year with Norv as OC, and a decent surrounding, he put up decent numbers, 76 passer rating, 16 tds, 16 ints and 2 rushing tds, now, the Offense now is greatly improved from 05, There is good weapons for him now, and a good OC, this is his judgement year, last year, he was hurt 4 games into the season, and had a poor WR core. He did play 3 games hurt before finally being benched, so take a look @ alex smith in those games before the injury, he was doing half decent, now, Jamarcus put up the same amount of ints/tds, so according to those numbers, if he had played every game, he would have 8 tds, 16 ints, Alex is also 1 year older than Jamarcus, now, this year, is the make or break year for Alex Smith. He will come in with a good WR core, a good OC, if you want to bring technicality into it, this is alex smiths 2nd year...


REdRUM said:
If they picked up McFadden, they'd be set (at RB), but they do have more pressing needs, and don't need a RB as much as many other positions, so yes, this can be said about the Raiders, too.
Click to expand...
McFadden could be a good pick, but it would show they have no faith in Bush, I think bush could be a very solid starter in the league, they should use the pick on stopping 1 of the AFC Wests elite backs, the best scenario would be for them to trade to Dallas for their 2 1sts, or even for a 1st and 2nd, and take A DL and a OL, 1-2 punch, that way they can improve their Running game, and their Run D, all in the same draft


REdRUM said:
Yes, the Raiders can use a WR; a QB, definately, but could pick up a decent QB via free agency or a late round pick, to be a backup.
Click to expand...
All of those needs could be addressed in the later rounds.....

REdRUM said:
LOL...you act like I was scoffing at your dumb post, ya' big dummy. LOL...don't be so quick to catch feelings; you're acting like a female, cupcake.
Click to expand...
never that
 
REdRUM

REdRUM

Sicc OG
#8
Aug 12, 2002
10,103
24
0
www.veronicamoser.com
#8
So...since 'the same could be said for the Raiders'...all those excuses could be used for Jamarcus, also, right? LOL

And ''no faith in Bush''...? He's a 4th round pick, and NOT the starter; it would be more towards Fargas.

Hit me up; I need to figure out how to get ringtones on my phone. LOL
 
cro-mag

cro-mag

Sicc OG
#10
May 1, 2007
336
2
0
41
#10
Chree said:
In 2005, Alex Smiths Rookie Year, He Started 7 games, with a shitty OC, and No weapons on offense, only a budding Frank Gore, but having Barlow in neutralized that, and added more harm, His 2nd year with Norv as OC, and a decent surrounding, he put up decent numbers, 76 passer rating, 16 tds, 16 ints and 2 rushing tds, now, the Offense now is greatly improved from 05, There is good weapons for him now, and a good OC, this is his judgement year, last year, he was hurt 4 games into the season, and had a poor WR core. He did play 3 games hurt before finally being benched, so take a look @ alex smith in those games before the injury, he was doing half decent, now, Jamarcus put up the same amount of ints/tds, so according to those numbers, if he had played every game, he would have 8 tds, 16 ints, Alex is also 1 year older than Jamarcus, now, this year, is the make or break year for Alex Smith. He will come in with a good WR core, a good OC, if you want to bring technicality into it, this is alex smiths 2nd year...
Click to expand...
lol @ this. You can't predict that jamarcus would have had 8 td's 16 int's from those few times he's played. Jamarcus only started 1 game last season and in 2 other games played only part of the games. This is after sitting out the entire pre-season. So your theory has absolutely no substance.
 
Chree

Chree

Medicated
#11
Dec 7, 2005
32,404
13,935
113
40
#11
just like u cant predict alex smith will be terrible this year from playing with his arm unattached last year...
 
cro-mag

cro-mag

Sicc OG
#12
May 1, 2007
336
2
0
41
#12
There is a big difference between a qb having 1 career start and another having started 3 seasons. It's a lot easier to see that smith is a bust.
 
Chree

Chree

Medicated
#14
Dec 7, 2005
32,404
13,935
113
40
#14
Started 3 seasons? he didnt start as a rookie, he only has 1 true season under his belt, he got hurt last year 4 games into the season, and played fucked up, u cant judge that, and he looked decent before that happened, he was 2-1 as a starter, even with a shitty OC and Wrs
 
cro-mag

cro-mag

Sicc OG
#16
May 1, 2007
336
2
0
41
#16
Chree said:
Started 3 seasons? he didnt start as a rookie, he only has 1 true season under his belt, he got hurt last year 4 games into the season, and played fucked up, u cant judge that, and he looked decent before that happened, he was 2-1 as a starter, even with a shitty OC and Wrs
Click to expand...
I'm basing it what I've seen on the field. Smith isn't a horrible qb, he's more of a mediocre qb, who looks like he should have been drafted in the 5th or 6th round rather than in the 1st. His accuracy problems and lack of arm strength is what I don't see him ever really overcoming.
 
Chree

Chree

Medicated
#17
Dec 7, 2005
32,404
13,935
113
40
#17
Its bad mechanics, he was taught by a terrible OC and QB Coach in his 1st year, Mike Mccarthy and Hostler lol and hostler was his OC last year, i know u may say that mccarthy isnt bad, he went to a damn good QB situation in GB
 
U

UCDgreek

Sicc OG
#18
May 17, 2004
2,574
2
0
42
#18
Chree said:
Its bad mechanics, he was taught by a terrible OC and QB Coach in his 1st year, Mike Mccarthy and Hostler lol and hostler was his OC last year, i know u may say that mccarthy isnt bad, he went to a damn good QB situation in GB
Click to expand...
no its coming from a spread offense in college playing against bad teams that made him look good.
and the first 3 games before he got hurt he wasnt playing any good. unless u consider like 150 yards/game 1 td, 1 int, and 2 fumbles lost good

im a 49er fan just like you but stop defending this bum until he actually does something.
and seeing this guy in person in davis acting like hes the shit doesnt help.
 
Chree

Chree

Medicated
#19
Dec 7, 2005
32,404
13,935
113
40
#19
U can check my posts back to the draft we got him in, i didnt want him, but im willing to give dude a real chance, this is his last and best chance to do good....
 
cro-mag

cro-mag

Sicc OG
#20
May 1, 2007
336
2
0
41
#20
UCDgreek said:
no its coming from a spread offense in college playing against bad teams that made him look good.
and the first 3 games before he got hurt he wasnt playing any good. unless u consider like 150 yards/game 1 td, 1 int, and 2 fumbles lost good

im a 49er fan just like you but stop defending this bum until he actually does something.
and seeing this guy in person in davis acting like hes the shit doesnt help.
Click to expand...
Exactly he was a system qb who played at Utah which isn't exactly in a very tough conference.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom