Like Yeah Killer song

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Aug 25, 2007
301
0
0
36
#42
I was just gonna say that lol, let's just say that 192kbps is probably the best quality you're gonna get without taking up excessive space for a track, anything higher is just wasted space (from my experience). 128kbps is the most "common" bitrate, and provides great quality, but not quite as good as a rip in 192kbps. My brother is pretty good with bitrates and he knows how to get low bitrates like 96 and 68kbps to sound pretty high quality to conserve space. But all in all, 192 is what you SHOULD be aiming for if you ever rip a CD to your computer, but 128kbps is more than acceptable (also, don't try to UPCONVERT a 128kbps track to 192 expecting to get more quality, that's just not gonna happen lol).

Edit:Yeah, Kain you're right, but it's probably one of the biggest factors besides initial recording, mic, sample rate, and equipment qualities, and I don't think we need to get all into that.
I always go for the highest quality possible, actually. I find there to be a pretty big drop in quality from 320 to 192. Sound quality takes priority over file size imo. Before OiNK got shut down I actually refused to even download anything below 192kbps. I've gotten slightly more lenient about it since then.


If none of that makes any sense its because I am pretty blunted right now :-/
 
Oct 25, 2006
3,029
52
48
35
#43
I always go for the highest quality possible, actually. I find there to be a pretty big drop in quality from 320 to 192. Sound quality takes priority over file size imo. Before OiNK got shut down I actually refused to even download anything below 192kbps. I've gotten slightly more lenient about it since then.


If none of that makes any sense its because I am pretty blunted right now :-/
Well you probably have some super fuckin Dumbo ears then hahaha (just messin :p), I can't hear a damn difference lol.
 
Aug 26, 2002
2,135
0
0
44
www.missouri.edu
#60