FATAL NYGHTMARE said:
MOST of the people arguing FOR Vick are the same people who were on his nuts to begin with, making him the most overrated player in NFL history. They were on his nuts then, and they're on his nuts now. That's why he had so much hype, and that's why there is a small margin of people who think what he did is OK. Do you get it? In no way does that mean every single person that was once a fan of his is going to condone his actions. It means that most of the people who DO condone it are fans of his.
And, again - why do you feel this was imprtant to point out? To show that there are more people who think like you?
But I have a good feeling that you're gonna respond, still not knowing what is going on. So I'll give up. You win. I'm wrong. Your 'logic' arguement got me. It's over.
Who is the one who just can't let it go?
This makes no sense. You're basically saying I don't value human life over a dog's life, and then asking why I'm having "such a tough time dealing with dogs dying." What's the point of this question?
You're saying I care more about dogs than people, but then asking me why I care about the dogs dying.
Other than that, I'm done. You win.
You're saying I care more about dogs than people, but then asking me why I care about the dogs dying.
Other than that, I'm done. You win.
But for those like you who somehow rationalize the value of a dog's life over a human, I say this -
I truly hope that life ironically finds a way for you to die being eaten by a pack of hungry dogs.
That is all.
Now, you go on and get the last response, and then head back to the flows forum - I heard it's poppin in there.