Is Curt Schilling a HOFer?

[90'sBayPlayer]

All I'm saying is that imo he's borderline for a couple of reasons. 1st wins and 2nd is the fact that he pissed off a lot of people that have to vote him in. And why can't I compare Gibson vs Schilling? It's done all the time in sports. I'd even take Maddox over Curt. Blyleven and Morris ain't in so Schilling should have to wait til they get in. That's my point.

 

[90'sBayPlayer]

Then Andy Pettite should make the HOF too? 18-7 in the postseason and has 4 rings.

W L ERA G GS CG SHO SV SVO IP H R ER HR BB SO
2008 14 14 4.54 33 33 0 0 0 0 204.0 233 112 103 19 55 158
Career 215 127 3.89 436 426 25 4 0 --- 2,731.2 2869 1308 1180 230 845 2002

 

[ArGenTin3]

Pettite? lol

come on now...stop being ignorant.

 

[Robby2Slobby]

If Morris isn't a hall of famer, Curt Schilling isn't.

 

[90'sBayPlayer]

It's a legit question, They have similar stats, minus 5 wins and the strikeouts.

 

[90'sBayPlayer]

If Morris isn't a hall of famer, Curt Schilling isn't.

I don't think that most of these cats were even watching baseball bacc then.

 

[Cut-Throat]

he wont be close on the 1st ballot...it will take a while if at all....

 

[I. Cold]

And why can't I compare Gibson vs Schilling?

I just thought it was an odd comparison, man. I had never heard of Gibson.. because he played in the 60s lol. No, I didnt watch baseball back then. I started watching baseball in the early 90s (when I was 10-11).

 

[90'sBayPlayer]

I just thought it was an odd comparison, man. I had never heard of Gibson.. because he played in the 60s lol. No, I didnt watch baseball back then. I started watching baseball in the early 90s (when I was 10-11).

Gibson and Schilling were dudes that didn't take shit from no one that's why I made the comparison . Morris and Blyleven were both VERy VERY good pitchers. I understand that most of y'all never watched tehm pitch, but there is no way that Schilling should get in before them.

 

[I. Cold]

You should change your name to 1890's BayPlayer

 

[90'sBayPlayer]

Lmao , that's some funny shit.

 

[I. Cold]

lol look who voted no:

IronLungs420

This la groupie has as much sports knowledge (any sport, you pick) as a bag of rocks.

 

[90'sBayPlayer]

lol look who voted no:

IronLungs420

This la groupie has as much sports knowledge (any sport, you pick) as a bag of rocks.

It must have been an accident, cuzz he was all butt hurt on page 1 .

 

[I. Cold]

oh ya you're right.. well.. hes still a douche

 

[90'sBayPlayer]

That seem to be the consensus around here

 

[IronLungs420]

HA!

 

[LA Dodgers]

easily..

anyone who says no doesnt know SHIT about baseball

i gues i dont know shit about baseball..............i think it can go either way but i personally dont think he will get in............

 

[LA Dodgers]

You see what he does in playoffs? You see what he does WHEN IT MATTERS?

if that were the case should we let in every .500 World Series hitter just because he hit over .500? even though he is a career .220 hitter with no power.......

Hersheiser single handedly beat the Mets in 88 NLCS and also went 59 straight.....does that make him a HOF'er?????

 

[IronLungs420]

i gues i dont know shit about baseball..............i think it can go either way but i personally dont think he will get in............

Yep you don't know shit!

 

[caff]

Schilling at 216 wins is not a hall of famer!

Mussina at 273? is not either, Schilling was a very good pitcher but he was looked at for roids how soon we forget, and the bottom line is he dose not have the numbers, hell there are 300 game winners not in the hall.

And stop with the bloody sock garbage, he had a scratch on his ankle big deal; there are guys that play the game with broken bones and life threatening diseases.

And less we not forget his mouth probably his worst enemy, I think most fans regardless of their teams, can look at a pitchers numbers and over all performance and come up with a logical vote on hall of fame worthiness.