Hold on, what? They said they heard explosions in the lobby...who said anything about the basement? And is the world to believe it would only take 3 explosions to bring down a skyscraper? It takes many many MANY explosives just to bring down a hotel. The guy also said a black plane hit the second tower...now there's VIDEO that says otherwise, isn't there? So how credible is their story, now?
They said they heard explosions and then the building fell on them. That explains the loud noise, doesn't it? Like I said, go stand next to a falling skyscraper and tell me what it sounds like. My coworker put dry ice in a 2 liter bottle and it sounded like a bomb went off. Does that mean it was a bomb? No, but those who didn't see it might say it was. When people survive tornadoes, they describe it as a freight train coming through the neighborhood. Does that mean a freight train went through the neighborhood? No, it just means that's what it sounded like.
I've also provided more than enough logical and scientific evidence that you have yet to address or attempt to counter. For every 1 person who says it was a conspiracy there are 20 more providing scientific and logical proof of the contrary.
I'm not saying you can't believe what you want, but if you're going to say something provide solid evidence to support your facts.
You of all people should know I'm far from naive and closed-minded.
please explain how the towers fell in their own footprint? or is indicative of terrorist attacks that hit 2 seperate towers, with 2 seperate planes, and they were the first towers in the history of the world to collapse after 1 hour of being on fire, WTC being the 3rd
or how about the molten steel at ground zero? the molten steel that flowed for 2 weeks after the towers fell?
no one is disputing the fact that planes hit the towers, its the science that doesnt fit...
regardless if it was jet fuel or not, the majority of fuel burned off on impact, leaving some to burn during the duration the towers stood, which was 1 hour give or take some
even if the steel at the top was softened and weak, what about the core columns at the base? were they being roasted in a (LOL) 1500 degree fire aswell? if not, then how come they provided no resistance to the falling tower? how come it did not lean over and smash into another building?
are you telling me that without a doubt, there is no other way possible those towers fell, besides one plane hittin one tower each?
c'mon man, you guys wanna call us crazy right off the bat, but doesnt it seem crazy to you that the first 2 towers in the world to collapse due to fire were WTC 1 and 2? and the 3rd was WTC 7?
and thats just the WTC towers, were not even goin to go into the pentagon, or how many pilots, with years of military experience, that have made it clear no 747-700 could ever pull of the turn that radar watches saw it make prior to slamming into the pentagon?
or the aerodynamics of a plane? you cant fly a plane 20ft off the ground at the speed needed to turn it into powder once it slams into a building...
theres so much more
seems to me like you guys are the ones that are crazy, but u dont see me callin you or foul mouth a J-Cat do you?
like i said, think what you want, ext ext
