I TOLD YAW..

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

EDJ

Sicc OG
May 3, 2002
11,608
234
63
www.myspace.com
#1
WHAT THE FUK WAS I TELLIN' YAW ABOUT THE COLTS? I TOLD YAW THEY RESTED TOO LONg. THEY WAS OUT OF SYNC. AND YET AND STILL AFTER THEY LOSS, THEY HAVE ALL THESE ANALYST ON THEY NUTS. AFTER SAN DIEgO WHOOPED THEY ASS, I KNEW THEY WASN'T THE SAME AND THAT THEY COULD BE BEAT AT HOME. PITTSBURgH gETS PROPS FOR PREPPIN' FOR THEM. I BET THEY LOOKED AT ALL KIND OF FOOTAgE OF COLTS VS SAN DIEgO gAME. IT WAS QUITE EVIDENT. PITTSBURgH'S "D" RATTLED MANNINg ALL gAME LONg. AND EVERYBODY WAS TALKIN' BOUT "YOUR BRONCOS ARE gONNA LOSE TO THE COLTS" ALL SEASON LONg, BUT THE COLTS HAD TO WIN A PLAYOFF gAME FOR THAT TO BE POSSIBLE. THEY LUKY THEY LOST NOW CAUSE DENVER WOULD OF SHOWED THEM UP IF THEY WON. ALL I'M SAYIN' IS......I TOLD YAW, AND NEVA ASSUME N-E-THANg. IT'S N-E gIVEN SUNDAY, FUK YAW FLUKED UP PERCEPTION. gOOD THANg WE AIN'T PLAYIN' PITTBURgH IN PITTSBURgH OR ELSE I'D BE WORRIED.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
45
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#2
I said the same thing. In the overrated team thread I said the "Cults" were the biggest flop team since the Jim Kelly Bills.

I also agreed with you that Denver will be in the Superbowl.

So it looks like I got my AFC side accurately predicted. I also predicted da bears would be in the playoffs (before the preseason even started!), and many laughed at me. Now all I need is a Seattle win. (PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE LET SEATTLE WIN!).
 

EDJ

Sicc OG
May 3, 2002
11,608
234
63
www.myspace.com
#3
^I MUST'VE MISSED THAT COMMENT. BUT YOU KNOWN TO SPEAK THE TRUTH. TOO BAD THE BEARS LOST. I WOULD'VE LOVED TO SEE DENVER PLAY THEM. BUT IF CAROLINA DON'T TAKE YOUR HAWKS OUT, THE AFC WILL(WHICH THE BRONCOS WILL MOST LIKELY REPRESENT). WHY DID SEATTLE MOVE TO THE NFC N-E-WAY?
 
May 6, 2002
7,218
2,906
113
#5
Ya, the Steelers played well but almost let it slip away from them.

Bronco fans were sweatin havin to go to Indy for the AFC finals.
The colts took the Broncos out of the playoffs several years in a row. What makes this year different? The Broncos would have gotten handled the same this year.

I have the Broncos to go to the Superbowl, and lose a close one to Carolina.
 
May 10, 2002
3,391
4
38
41
#7
714KaliHydro said:
Bronco fans were sweatin havin to go to Indy for the AFC finals.
The colts took the Broncos out of the playoffs several years in a row. What makes this year different? The Broncos would have gotten handled the same this year.
.

sweatin? hell nah i wanted the colts to play denver cuz the colts fuckin suck and they woulda got crushed...which is proven in fact because they got ran on last week....and they COULDA won but they choked it down like a bad pill u gotta swallow by shankin that kick and going to OT

the colts beat the broncos several years in a row what makes this year any diff? well lets see do i have to go through our defensive line? or our offensive line? what makes it different is the colts went down hill before the playoffs even started. and saying they woulda won against the broncs this year is just being niave
 

ArYo

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2002
1,224
0
36
#8
shit the colts aren't as even as big of flop as the bills yet at least the bills went to the super bowl what like 3 times, but then again i think i would rather never go then go and lose especially that many times
 
May 6, 2002
7,218
2,906
113
#9
Colts would have owned the Broncos, they just have their number.

Or was "this the year" that they could beat the Colts.
Just like "this is the year" the Colts win the Superbowl.

Your lucky you are playing the Steelers.
 

EDJ

Sicc OG
May 3, 2002
11,608
234
63
www.myspace.com
#11
^DON'T PUT MONEY ON IT.

714KALIHYDRO,
CAUgHT YO' ASS! THIS THREAD WAS SPECIFICALLY MADE FOR MUTHA-FUKAS LIKE YOU WITH YOUR OPINION. THE COLTS WERE OVER-RATED AND YOU STILL ON THEY NUTS. HOW PATHETIC. IF THE STEELERS WHOOPED THEM LIKE THAT AT HOME, AND WHEN SAN DIEgO WHOOPED THEY ASS AND CUT THEY UNDEFEATED SEASON, WHAT MAKES YOU THINK THAT DENVER WAS JUST gONNA gET ROLLED OVER? IF DENVER CAN BEAT NEW ENgLAND(WHO BEAT THE COLTS AFTER THEY BEAT US THE LAS TWO PREVIOUS YEARS) AND SAN DIEgO, HOW YOU FIgURE THEY gOT OUR NUMBER? IF THEY CAN'T BEAT PITTSBURgH AT HOME, WHAT MAKES YOU THINK THEY HAD N-E CHANCE WITH US? AND WHAT WE'VE BEEN DOIN' AIN'T NO LUK. WE'VE BEEN WINNIN' FOR TWO REASONS. DEFENSE AND A RUNNIN' gAME(WITH AN OPTIONAL PLAY MAKIN' QB). WE WAS IN THE HARDEST DIVISION AND WON IT. NOW YOUR TEAMS ARE OUT, AND WE STILL HERE. LUK IS WHAT THE COLTS WERE HAVIN' TIL THEY WERE EXPOSED BY THE CHARgERS. LUK IS WHAT NEW ENgLAND HAD WITH THEY FAKE LUKY-ASS DYNASTY TIL THEY WERE EXPOSED BY THE BRONCOS "D".
 
May 10, 2002
3,391
4
38
41
#12
theres not many times i can ever say this, but, i agree 100% with EDJ


coulda woulda shoulda....fact is u dont even get the fuckin chance so dont open your trap otherwise ill shit some truth down your throat
 
May 6, 2002
7,218
2,906
113
#14
@EDJ

Just because I think Indi has Denver's number, doesn't mean I'm on their nuts. The Colts beat the Pats this year as well, the Pats aren't a dynasty team anymore.

SD beat the Colts (when they had no reason to win other than keep a streak) and the Steelers beat em by 3. Laughing at Denver being in the hardest division, the only real threat was KC (all offense and no defense).

The Colts would have demolished Denver, again.
It's not like my opinion is far fetched.
 
Apr 25, 2002
5,396
52
0
45
#15
I fuckin' hope that Denver destroys Pittsburgh.....Fuck the Steelers and fuck Cowher and his spittin' ass mouth........
 

EDJ

Sicc OG
May 3, 2002
11,608
234
63
www.myspace.com
#17
^DON'T TELL THAT TO JEROME BETTIS.

714KALIHYDRO,
YOU STRESSED, "Just because I think Indi has Denver's number, doesn't mean I'm on their nuts."

BULLSHIT. I BEg TO DIFFER. THEY AIN'T EVEN IN THE PLAYOFFS NO MORE AND HEAR YOU gO TALKIN' WOULD OF COULD OF NONSENSE THAT NEVA MATERIALIZED. AS STATED BEFORE, THE COLTS WERE EXPOSED BEFORE DENVER HAD A CHANCE TO AVENgE THEY POST-SEASON LOSSES.

THEN YOU STRESSED, "The Colts beat the Pats this year as well, the Pats aren't a dynasty team anymore.'

THANKS TO US. AND INDI AIN'T A POWERHOUSE LIKE PEOPLE THOUgHT. WE SHOWED AND PROVED DESPITE THE OPPOSITION. WE TOOK CARE OF A TEAM INDI NEVA COULD.

THEN YOU STRESSED, "SD beat the Colts (when they had no reason to win other than keep a streak) and the Steelers beat em by 3."

BOTH gAMES AT HOME. THAT NEVA HAPPENED AT MILE HI. IF THE SAN DIEgO gAME DIDN'T MEAN SHIT, WHY THEY START MANNINg AND HAD HIM IN HARMS WAY WITH SAN DIEgO'S "D"? QUIT MAKIN' EXCUSES. AND IN MY EYES, THE STEELERS AND REFS ALMOST HANDED THE gAME TO THE COLTS AFTER PITTBURgH DOMINATED THE WHOLE gAME. THAT INTERCEPTION SHOULD OF HAPPENED AND INDI WOULD OF NEVA SCORED. AND JEROME SHOULDN'T OF FUMBLED AND THAT'S ANOTHA SCORE. SO IT WAS MORE THAN WHAT THE SCORE AND YOU IMPLYIN'.

THEN YOU STRESSED, "Laughing at Denver being in the hardest division, the only real threat was KC (all offense and no defense)."

LAUgHIN' AT YOU FOR NOT BEIN' A REAL SPORTS FAN AND TRYIN' TO PASS OFF AS ONE. LOOK AND RESEARCH AND YOU WILL SEE THAT THE AFC WEST WAS THE HARDEST DIVISION IN THE NFL. NOT ONLY WAS KC A THREAT, BUT SAN DIEgO(WHO WHOOPED YOUR BELOVED COLTS) BARELY MISSED THE PLAYOFFS, THANKS TO TECHNICALITIES. 3 TEAMS OUT OF 4 IN A DIVISION WITH WINNIN' RECORDS IS A HARD DIVISION. DO YOUR RESEARCH.

THEN YOU STRESSED, "The Colts would have demolished Denver, again.
It's not like my opinion is far fetched."

YES IT IS. LAY OFF THE KALI HYDRO. TOO BAD THE COLTS LOST AT HOME ALL OVER-CONFIDENT AND DON'T HAVE THE CHANCE TO PROVE YOU WRONg.
 
May 6, 2002
7,218
2,906
113
#18
The things you claim are absurd.

>BULLSHIT. I BEg TO DIFFER. THEY AIN'T EVEN IN THE PLAYOFFS NO MORE AND HEAR YOU gO
>TALKIN' WOULD OF COULD OF NONSENSE THAT NEVA MATERIALIZED. AS STATED BEFORE, THE >COLTS WERE EXPOSED BEFORE DENVER HAD A CHANCE TO AVENgE THEY POST-SEASON LOSSES.[/B]

Avenge their loss? This is far from a rivalry. The Colts own the Broncos everytime they play. Point blank. What is with all this exposed talk? I never said they were unbeatable, nor the best team in the NFL. They won first seed, and got beat by a better team. You act like I am in some denial. All I said was the Colts own the Broncos and you seem to have to lash out like it is an absurd statement.


THANKS TO US. AND INDI AIN'T A POWERHOUSE LIKE PEOPLE THOUgHT. WE SHOWED AND PROVED DESPITE THE OPPOSITION. WE TOOK CARE OF A TEAM INDI NEVA COULD.

We beat the Pats this year, just like you guys did.


BOTH gAMES AT HOME. THAT NEVA HAPPENED AT MILE HI. IF THE SAN DIEgO gAME DIDN'T MEAN SHIT, WHY THEY START MANNINg AND HAD HIM IN HARMS WAY WITH SAN DIEgO'S "D"? QUIT MAKIN' EXCUSES. AND IN MY EYES, THE STEELERS AND REFS ALMOST HANDED THE gAME TO THE COLTS AFTER PITTBURgH DOMINATED THE WHOLE gAME. THAT INTERCEPTION SHOULD OF HAPPENED AND INDI WOULD OF NEVA SCORED. AND JEROME SHOULDN'T OF FUMBLED AND THAT'S ANOTHA SCORE. SO IT WAS MORE THAN WHAT THE SCORE AND YOU IMPLYIN'.

Interception shouldnt of happened, Jerome shouldnt have fumbled, etc etc etc etc
Ha, Im not the one with excuses here. It's sports, things happen.


LAUgHIN' AT YOU FOR NOT BEIN' A REAL SPORTS FAN AND TRYIN' TO PASS OFF AS ONE. LOOK AND RESEARCH AND YOU WILL SEE THAT THE AFC WEST WAS THE HARDEST DIVISION IN THE NFL. NOT ONLY WAS KC A THREAT, BUT SAN DIEgO(WHO WHOOPED YOUR BELOVED COLTS) BARELY MISSED THE PLAYOFFS, THANKS TO TECHNICALITIES. 3 TEAMS OUT OF 4 IN A DIVISION WITH WINNIN' RECORDS IS A HARD DIVISION. DO YOUR RESEARCH.

When did I try to pass off as a real football fan? Football is my least, right next to basketball. I actually follow fights and baseball more than anything. I gamble more than follow, and your Broncos have won me some good money. I bet on the Steelers and the Broncos last week on a parlay, no points just money line....so take that fan crap somewhere else. I bet AGAINST my team, and for YOUR team. I bet them as I see them. You cannot determine the heardest division on the wins, but on the ease of the schedule. As a matter of fact, the Colts had a pretty easy one this year. I still don't see where you find me saying that the Colts were untouchable and such as power house.

YES IT IS. LAY OFF THE KALI HYDRO. TOO BAD THE COLTS LOST AT HOME ALL OVER-CONFIDENT AND DON'T HAVE THE CHANCE TO PROVE YOU WRONg.[/QUOTE]

This SN is actually about 6 years old, I've been sober for years now. Yes, the Colts lost at home. You keep attempting to prove me wrong about something that can't be done since they won't be playing. The way your logic is from what you have been saying, is if the Broncos beat the Steelers, then the Broncos would have beaten the colts. Typical sports fan, plays with his heart and not with his head.

So the Broncos are plus 3 right now against the Steelers, -125 on the spread and -160 on the line.
The Colts were plus 10 against the Steelers, and the Steelers had a +450 on the line.
Just look at the difference (if you know what any of those numbers mean) and it will tell you that the majority of the bookies agree with you in regards of the Colts being over-hyped, which was created by fans just like yourself.
 

EDJ

Sicc OG
May 3, 2002
11,608
234
63
www.myspace.com
#19
714KALIHYDRO,

YOU STRESSED, "The things you claim are absurd."

HOW YOU FIgURE?


THEN YOU STRESSED, "Avenge their loss? This is far from a rivalry."

ACCORDIN' TO WHO? THE BRONCOS LOST TWICE TO THEM THE PAST TWO YEARS IN THE PLAYOFFS WHILE THEY BEAT THEM IN REgULAR SEASON. I KNOW YOU WANTED TO SEE THAT gAME VERSUS US AND THE STEELERS. I BELIEVE IN THE PLAYOFFS, IT IS A RIVALRY, ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU KEEP SEEIN' THE SAME TEAM.

THEN YOU STRESSED, "The Colts own the Broncos everytime they play. Point blank."

BULLSHIT. DO YOUR RESEARCH. THEY ONLY BEAT US IN TWO WILDCARD gAMES. WE'VE BEAT THEM IN REgULAR SEASON THEM TWO YEARS AND THIS YEAR IN THE PRESEASON. gET YOUR FACTS STRAIgHT.

THEN YOU STRESSED, "What is with all this exposed talk?"

NOT AS gOOD AS EVERYBODY HYPED THEM OUT TO BE.

THEN YOU STRESSED, "I never said they were unbeatable, nor the best team in the NFL."

SURE ACTIN' LIKE IT. EVEN TALKIN' ABOUT THEM WHEN THEY A NON-FACTOR.

THEN YOU STRESSED, "They won first seed, and got beat by a better team. You act like I am in some denial. All I said was the Colts own the Broncos and you seem to have to lash out like it is an absurd statement."

IT IS AN ABSURD STATEMENT. THE BRONCOS DID THEY PART TO gET TO THE CHAMPIONSHIP AND INDI DON'T EVEN SHOW UP. OF COURSE INDI gOT BEAT BY A BETTER TEAM. NOW WE gONNA STOMP THE TEAM THAT BEAT INDI. YOU SEEM LIKE YOU DENIAL, STILL TALKIN' BOUT THE COLTS.


THEN YOU STRESSED, "We beat the Pats this year, just like you guys did."

WE BEAT THEM TWICE AND WHEN IT COUNTED. AND WE STILL gOT HATERS AND BEIN' UNDA-RATED.

THEN YOU STRESSED, "Interception shouldnt of happened, Jerome shouldnt have fumbled, etc etc etc etc
Ha, Im not the one with excuses here. It's sports, things happen."

MY POINT IS THAT THE SCORE DID NOT INDICATE HOW THE gAME WAS REALLY DOMINATED BY THE STEELERS.

THEN YOU STRESSED, "When did I try to pass off as a real football fan?"

WHEN YOU CAME IN HERE AND TRIED TO SPEAK UP.

THEN YOU STRESSED, " Football is my least, right next to basketball."

TOO BAD.


THEN YOU STRESSED, "I actually follow fights and baseball more than anything."

YOU SOUND LIKE MCLEANHATCH NOW. WHY BASEBALL? SO BORIN'.

THEN YOU STRESSED, "I gamble more than follow, and your Broncos have won me some good money. I bet on the Steelers and the Broncos last week on a parlay, no points just money line....so take that fan crap somewhere else."

gOOD FOR YOU.

THEN YOU STRESSED, "I bet AGAINST my team, and for YOUR team. I bet them as I see them."

SO WHAT DO YOU SEE THIS WEEK MR. gAMBLIN' gURU? I WAS gONNA BET ON PITTSBURgH LAST WEEK TOO, BUT I WAS TOO LAZY.

THEN YOU STRESSED, "You cannot determine the heardest division on the wins, but on the ease of the schedule. As a matter of fact, the Colts had a pretty easy one this year."

THE AFC WEST ALL HAD A HARD SCHEDULE AND WE WAS STILL HAVIN' WINNIN' RECORDS.

THEN YOU STRESSED, "I still don't see where you find me saying that the Colts were untouchable and such as power house."

YOU SURE MAKIN' THEM SEEM LIKE THEY CAN FUK WITH A BETTER TEAM(THE BRONCOS).

THEN YOU STRESSED, "This SN is actually about 6 years old, I've been sober for years now. Yes, the Colts lost at home. You keep attempting to prove me wrong about something that can't be done since they won't be playing. The way your logic is from what you have been saying, is if the Broncos beat the Steelers, then the Broncos would have beaten the colts. Typical sports fan, plays with his heart and not with his head."

NO, WHAT I'M SAYIN' IS THAT THE BRONCOS ARE A BETTER TEAM, BY BEATIN' TEAMS YOUR TEAM HAD PROBLEMS WITH.

THEN YOU STRESSED, "So the Broncos are plus 3 right now against the Steelers, -125 on the spread and -160 on the line.
The Colts were plus 10 against the Steelers, and the Steelers had a +450 on the line.
Just look at the difference (if you know what any of those numbers mean) and it will tell you that the majority of the bookies agree with you in regards of the Colts being over-hyped, which was created by fans just like yourself."

SO EXPLAIN SOMETHIN' ABOUT THE LINE AND THE SPREAD AND CAN YOU LINK ME TO WHERE YOU gET YOUR FIgURES FROM?
 
May 6, 2002
7,218
2,906
113
#20
^^^^

I'm not tryng to argue with you about this so calm down.
Just because "A" beat "B" and "B" beat "C", does not mean that "A" can beat "C". If me thinking that the Colts can beat the Broncos defines me as a nut-hugger than so be it.

In regards of the odds.
I put money on Pits, on the money line. Money line means no spread. They are +135 right now. Meaning, you put up a 100, to win $135 (235 back). If you play the spread, they are +3 at -110 meaning you have to put 110 up to win 100, and Denver has to win by more than 3 points (if they win by 3 it is a push).

I got money on the Steelers on the line, and Seattle on the spread. Denver has won a lot of money for me this year, but this one is risky plus they are -160 on the line, which is ridiculous. All in all, it should be a good game.

If you want standard odds, you can go to sportsbook.com
I usually go off of www.wsex.com (worlds sports exchange)