Hopkins acting like a BIA BIA

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

caff

Sicc OG
May 10, 2002
17,965
259
83
49
#1
Link

Hopkins threatens to pull out of Saturday's fight over referee

By TIM DAHLBERG, AP Boxing Writer
June 3, 2004
LAS VEGAS (AP) -- Bernard Hopkins has spent his career doing things his way, often to the detriment of his bank account.

That didn't change Thursday when Hopkins threatened to pull out of a deal with Oscar De La Hoya worth at least $15 million because he didn't like the choice of referee Joe Cortez for his fight Saturday night.

``I'm adamant about my instincts,'' Hopkins said. ``I don't want Cortez.''

ADVERTISEMENT


Hopkins first said he had booked an afternoon flight home, then said later he was chartering a private jet to take him back to Philadelphia on Thursday night if the referee wasn't changed.

Hopkins ended up staying the night, however, while De La Hoya called Cortez personally to try to get him to step aside. But Nevada regulators said the situation was still at an impasse pending a change of mind by Cortez.

If he followed through with the threat, both the Saturday card featuring Hopkins against Robert Allen and De La Hoya against Felix Sturm and a planned Sept. 18 megafight between De La Hoya and Hopkins would be off.

``He would be making a fatal mistake,'' promoter Bob Arum said. ``That would be the end of his boxing career.''

Nevada Athletic Commission executive director Marc Ratner said there would be no emergency meeting of the commission to discuss changing the referee and that no one would ask Cortez to step aside.

Ratner, though, didn't rule out Cortez volunteering to do another fight on the card instead.

``That would be entirely up to Joe Cortez,'' he said.

Reached at his Las Vegas home, Cortez said he couldn't understand why Hopkins didn't want him as the referee. Cortez also said he had no plans to step aside.

``I think if I volunteer to step aside then I'm admitting to what he's saying,'' said Cortez, who has refereed 163 title fights in a 27-year career and is regarded as one of the top referees in the world.

``My integrity is impeccable. You just can't have people changing officials.''

Hopkins, who has been accused by some in boxing as being paranoid about his business dealings, said he didn't know that Cortez was going to be the referee until Thursday. He said he didn't want Cortez because he had twice refused him for fights in the past, and feared Cortez might hold a grudge.

One of those fights as Hopkins' win over Felix Trinidad, and Hopkins didn't want Cortez because both Cortez and Trinidad are Puerto Rican.

``Evidently there is some history we were unaware of,'' Ratner said.

De La Hoya, meanwhile, suggested that perhaps Hopkins was merely getting nervous about one of the biggest fights of his career.

``Things start happening and you start to feel jumpy,'' De La Hoya said. ``A little jitterbug here? That's good to know.''

Hopkins is scheduled to make a minimum of $1.25 million to defend his undisputed middleweight titles against Allen on the same card Saturday night as De La Hoya's fight with Sturm.

If both win, they are scheduled to meet Sept. 18 in a fight that would pay Hopkins a minimum of $10 million, by far the biggest purse of his career.

Only a few hours before Hopkins issued his ultimatum, Arum called him a ``promoter's dream'' for all the effort he has made to sell the fights. And De La Hoya said he thought Hopkins was bluffing.

``I'm not concerned he'll pull out,'' De La Hoya said. ``Maybe it's a tactic of his. He's a smart guy.''

There were suggestions that Cortez could trade with Tony Weeks, the referee of a lightweight fight between Juan Lazcano and Jose Luis Castillo on the card, but Ratner said that would have to be Cortez's decision.

Cortez was picked last week by the commission, and Ratner said Hopkins' camp was informed then of the choice, though they deny it.

The controversy is reminiscent of a similar incident that happened just before the second fight between Mike Tyson and Evander Holyfield in 1997. Tyson's handlers complained the week before the fight they hadn't been told the referee of the first fight, Mitch Halpern, would be the third man in the ring and demanded he be replaced.

Halpern would step down, saying he didn't want to be the cause of the fight not happening. He was replaced by Mills Lane, who won acclaim and international fame for his actions in the infamous ``Bite Fight.''

Hopkins is the undisputed middleweight champion of the world, a fighter so good that he hasn't lost in 11 years.

But at the age of 39 he's still not a popular draw and has spent much of his career fighting with promoters, managers and anyone else who he believes might be trying to harm him.

Hopkins made less than $300,000 in his last fight against Joppy and had eagerly promoted the two-fight deal with De La Hoya as vindication for the way he ran his career before the controversy over Cortez.

De La Hoya said that if Hopkins pulled out, it would disrupt his own fight schedule for the entire year.

``That would be disastrous for me,'' De La Hoya said. ``I signed a deal with Hopkins because it's him. It's the biggest challenge of my life.''

The Sept. 18 middleweight title fight could be the richest non-heavyweight fight ever, and De La Hoya said Hopkins needs to realize that.

``For having that attitude he's missed out on a lot of opportunities,'' De La Hoya said. ``He needs to look at the big picture.''


Updated
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
48
#2
Hopkins is doing the right thing. Cortez is a bias ref. Just watch Holyfield versus Ruiz 2 and you'll see. Holyfield hit him with a clean body shot and then a left hook to the head and Cortez ruled that Holyfield hit him with a low blow and took a point. And the Ruiz gets up and hits Holyfield below the belt and no point taken away. First of all Holyfield's wasn't low and it was unintentional and Ruiz's was low and intentional and no point taken away. Cortez is a biased ref and Hopkins is doing the right thing.
 

ComputerNerd

Graphic Artist
Apr 25, 2002
1,812
18
0
#3
hopkins has been getting chump change throught his career, and now the big pay days are coming in, he better fight........he's 39 and could make close to 12 million this year, so i would suck it up, and fight the best fight u can........the public will see who the real winner is, that's if the ref is biased, and all the while your pockets will get fatter.........also i wanna bet on the fight this weekend, so hope it goes down lol
 
May 2, 2002
2,185
1
0
47
www.westsiderap.com
#5
LAS VEGAS (AP) -- Middleweight champion Bernard Hopkins backed off his demand for a referee change Friday, salvaging a lucrative fight card with Oscar De La Hoya.

Just hours before the scheduled weigh-in for Saturday's doubleheader, Hopkins agreed to have referee Joe Cortez do his title defense with Robert Allen.

``The fight is on,'' promoter Bob Arum said. ``I just left Bernard Hopkins' room and all the issues have been resolved.''

Arum credited mediation by Francisco Valcarcel, president of the World Boxing Organization, with changing Hopkins' mind about the referee.

Hopkins threatened to pull out of the fight and leave town rather than have Cortez referee the fight. He accused Cortez of having a bias against him, even though he had never refereed any of his fights.

But the Nevada Athletic Commission refused to ask Cortez to step aside, and Cortez refused to volunteer to do so, leaving the fight uncertain until early Friday afternoon.

If he would have walked away, Hopkins would have lost an estimated $15 million he could earn for the fight and a planned Sept. 18 showdown with De La Hoya.

De La Hoya fights WBO 160-pound champion Felix Sturm on the same card Saturday night. If both he and Hopkins win, they will meet in September.

Later!!