Hamas wins huge majority

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
45
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#1
Hamas wins huge majority

Thursday 26 January 2006, 21:24 Makka Time, 18:24 GMT

The Islamic group Hamas has won a huge majority in parliamentary elections as Palestinian voters rejected the long-time rule of the Fatah Party.

Of the 132 seats in Parliament, Hamas won 76 and Fatah 43, the election commission announced on Thursday.




Palestinian Prime Minister Ahmed Qureia and his Cabinet resigned, even before the official results were announced, and Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas was to ask Hamas to form the next government.

The top Hamas leader, Khaled Mashaal, told Abbas his group is ready for a political partnership, Hamas said.

And in a first sign of pragmatism, Mahmoud Zahar, a top Hamas official, said the group would extend its year-old truce if Israel reciprocates. "If not, then I think we will have no option but to protect our people and our land," he said.



Loyal opposition

Fatah legislator Saeb Erekat said the party does not want to join a Hamas government. "We will be a loyal opposition and rebuild the party," Erekat said, after meeting Abbas.

But Nabil Shaath, another senior Fatah lawmaker, said the party's leadership would make a decision later on Thursday.

Abbas was elected separately a year ago and remains president. However, the Palestinian leader has said he would resign if he could no longer pursue his peace agenda.



The Cabinet and legislature must approve any major initiative by Abbas, giving Hamas tremendous influence over peace moves.



Hamas supporters streamed into the streets to celebrate.



In the southern Gaza town of Rafah, supporters shot in the air and handed out candy. Others honked horns and waved Hamas flags from car windows.



Hamas capitalized on widespread discontent with years of Fatah corruption and ineffectiveness. Much of its campaign focused on internal Palestinian issues, while playing down the conflict with Israel.



Mixed signals

Before the election, Hamas had suggested it would be content as a junior partner in the next government, thus avoiding a decision on its relationship with Israel.

Throughout the campaign, leaders sent mixed signals, hinting they could be open to some sort of accommodation with Israel. Its apparent victory will now force it to take a clearer position on key issues.



Mushir al-Masri, a Hamas candidate who won election in the northern Gaza Strip, said peace talks and recognition of Israel are "not on our agenda" but the group is ready for a partnership - presumably with Abbas.



Some Hamas officials tried to reassure the world of its intentions.



"Don't be afraid," Ismail Haniyeh, a Hamas leader, told the BBC. "Hamas is a Palestinian movement, it is an aware and mature movement, one which is politically open in the Palestinian arena, and to its Arab and Islamic hinterland, and similarly open to the international arena."



This was the first time Hamas has contested a parliamentary vote.



Half the seats in Wednesday's parliament vote were chosen on a national list and the other half by districts.



Advantage



Hamas apparently took advantage of divisions in Fatah; the long-ruling party fielded multiple candidates in many districts, splitting the Fatah vote.

Palestinian legislator Hanan Ashrawi, who apparently was re-elected on a moderate platform, said the Hamas victory was a dramatic turning point. She said she is concerned the fighters will now impose their fundamentalist social agenda and lead the Palestinians into international isolation.

She said Fatah's corruption, Israel's tough measures and international indifference to the plight of the Palestinians were to blame for Hamas's strong showing.



Turnout for Wednesday's vote was heavy, with nearly 78% of 1.3 million eligible voters casting ballots. The polling stations were heavily guarded, and there were no reports of major violence.



:::::
:::::

Opinions?
 
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#2
just because you support "democracy" doesn't mean your desired outcome will always come to fruition. sometimes the voters bite you in the ass.

i.e. Venezuela, Bolivia, etc


U.S. & Israel need to find a way to live with it and except Palestine electing who they want to rule their "country" and try and work towards peace or start bombing, f-16 sonic booms and calling the Palestinian government a terrorist dictatorship.
 

Hemp

Sicc OG
Sep 5, 2005
1,248
2
0
#4
i hate how all of this corporate news is talkin about "and with hamas as government, the bush administration will have even more trouble establishing world peace"
 
Dec 25, 2003
12,356
218
0
70
#6
Violence is as ingrained into the Middle East as hypocrisy is in the American bureaucratic legacy.

We have two options:

1. Leave Israel to be flattened.
2. Flatten all majority Muslim countries excepting Singapore.

We will have to make a choice eventually.
 
May 14, 2002
6,278
6,950
113
43
#8
I think america put another country on their list to bomb and 'libarete' people from.

I was watching CNN last night and their were only talks about how bad this is for Isreal and the world peace it was pretty much a one sided story.

I'm just curious now how things will evolope in the next few years because they don't seem to get much foreign support aswell.
 
May 1, 2003
6,431
25
0
54
#10
does this give them access to ALL military assets? If so... damn. I saw form PM Netanyahu on the news this morning. I think he has a good chance of being elected in the next election , seeing his unwavered stance towards Hamas.
 
Oct 28, 2005
2,980
25
0
42
www.myspace.com
#11
I will track down Bush's remarks later, because I know none of you are going to do it.

He basically said something to the effect of, "Voting is good for healthy societies. And the people here have voted their will." -- The main point of the remarks was to emphasize that the United States Gov't is not entirely happy with the results, but does not want to attempt to void the will of the Palestenian people, other than urging Hamas to renounce violence.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
45
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#12
He also said, and I quote, "On the other hand, I don't see how you can be a partner in peace if you advocate the destruction of a country as part of your platform… And I know you can't be a partner in peace . . . if your party has got an armed wing."

This caused me to laugh hysterically.