Halloween 3D Slated for Summer 2010 Without Rob Zombie
Posted on Sunday, August 30th, 2009 by
Hunter Stephenson
Over the weekend, the conclusion to
Rob Zombie’s fresh take on the franchise,
Halloween II, grossed $17 million. Budgeted at $15 million, the sequel would likely have grossed much more if not for direct competition with the weekend’s top
movie and debut,
The Final Destination 3D (a very healthy $28m). Today, the rebounding
Weinstein Company announced a new, eleventh installment that is already in the planning stages. Entitled, not-so-curiously,
Halloween 3D, it’s slated for release next summer.
According to the
LA Times,
Dimension’s
Bob Weinstein offered that Zombie would not be back, as expected per his upcoming
The Blob, and that a new director is in talks, one with experience in horror and a “different take” on
Michael Myers. Note: /Film commenter, DrChicago, guesses that
Alexandre Aja (
High Tension)may be the director in line to take over the franchise. This is a great guess because Aja is currently finishing up
Piranha 3D for Dimension and is not officially booked for another project; then again,
Piranha is due April ‘10, so would Aja really have two 3D horror
films from the same studio released so close together?
In a
set visit report last Friday, I quoted franchise producer,
Malek Akkad, as acknowledging a “third”
film way back in April: “Well, the way it works is that, our deal withDimension, is that hopefully they can opt to do another one. And that’s a legal technicality, and a whole other issue. …It feels like these two films are really Rob’s take. And, you know, we’ll address [a sequel] later. …Where we go from here is anyone’s guess. …There’s going to be the diehards that are never going to be happy unless it’s frame-for-frame like
John Carpenter’s version.”
In lieu of generally poor reviews and unjustified vitriol from critics for
Halloween II, this writer is predictably quite curious to see how these same critics react, both to the news of an unrelated follow-up and to the 2010 film itself. Similar to
Frankenstein,
Dracula, and hell, even
the Blob, new films featuring Michael Myers, an iconic monster of modern horror, will always be on the way. As an enthusiast of horror, personally I’m fine with that. I also chalk this reality off to why I prefer watching new entries written and directed by a talented and cool genre auteur like Rob Zombie; a filmmaker who actually took the time to deconstruct and reconstruct the franchise’s mythos, characters, and ignore its reputation for C-list talent (by casting
Brad Dourif,
Malcolm McDowell, and
Weird Al). For once, audiences were required to think about Michael Myers, about why—post Carpenter’s original—he remains scary, and the character’s murky line between spectre, zombie, and serial killer.
Whether one disliked or even detested Zombie’s vision(s), he forever contributed two films to a series that had come to possess all the definition of a dark, dead-end alley in the worst way. With nowhere else to go but retread that tired path, Zombie instead took a risk and placed the identity of Myers—a far more dubious horror icon compared to
Jason Voorhees and
Freddy Krueger—and his sister’s front-and-center. And, in retrospect, I think it will come to be seen as natural that, arguably, the only working American director whose face/image is synonymous with American horror got a shot; nay,
wanted two shots at Myers.
Now that his versions have ridden the white horse into horror history,
who would you like to see direct Halloween 3D? Moreover, what American horror director(s) do you find superior to Rob Zombie, with the exception of
Sam Raimi, who tends to venture outside the genre? Producer Akkad previously expressed, “…obviously
Halloween, and
Michael Myers, is a very American horror icon. And Rob gets that.” This was in response to a question about the involvement of
Alexandre Bustillo and
Julien Maury, the French directors of
Inside, who were originally slated for
Halloween II. He added, “And these guys were French, so there was something lost in translation somehow,” half in jest.