Greatest QB EVER!!
- Thread starter TRAJIK1
- Start date
Stats for two different eras with different defensive rules. Get that through your head you dumb ignorant bastard! Plain and simple: Terry Bradshaw and Joe Montana are the only QB's who can say they won four Super Bowls! They both did it in comeback situations also! You obviously never saw the Super Bowls or any playoff games that Bradshaw played in. Anyone who knows the game of football knows exactly what I'm saying. Your bitch made ass is the one who sounds stupid posting some dumb ass bullshit. Learn the history of the game and recognize the legends who helped make the game what it is today!
Lol@ you coming in throwing insults instead of stats and facts. Don't give me that different era bullshit. Like I said before, Bradshaw was too careless with the football.. His 212-210 TD-INT Ratio ain't touching Montana's 273-139 TD-INT Ratio.. or Young's 232-107, or Brady's 197-86, or Manning's 306-153, Marino's 420-252.... His QB Rating is 70.9.. Jeff Blake has a better QB Rating and TD-INT Ratio... What does that tell you? Anyone coulda been QB for them Steelers.
Eli didn't play LB, DL or DB so he didn't beat Brady. That D did. And Brady has surpassed Montana no matter what any of u fools think. Dude has action @ winning about 3 more Championships. He's that good & so is his team & the Pats coaching staff. Joe got 3 rings but Brady is just 1 behind him & might/will most likely surpass Joe in SB's & stats in the next 4-5 years. Not taking nothing away from Bill Walsh who's a lot more responsible then Joe for the success of the 80's Niners but that's just how I see it.
Eli Manning? LOL! Ok let's add Mark Rypien of the Redskins, Jim Plunkett of the Raiders, Trent Dilfer of the Ravens, or even Kurt Warner of the Rams.
Eli Manning? LOL! Ok let's add Mark Rypien of the Redskins, Jim Plunkett of the Raiders, Trent Dilfer of the Ravens, or even Kurt Warner of the Rams.
ACTUALLY IF ANYTHING IT SHOWS THAT BRADY IS JUST LIKE ANY OTHER QB WHEN THERE O-LINE IS AVERAGE OR BELOW AVERAGE, LIKE I SAID BEFORE THE DEFENSE IS WHAT PUT HIM IN POSITION TO WIN THOSE SUPERBOWLS AND ANY QB THAT CAN JUST STAND THERE FOR 10 SECONDS WILL BE A GOOD PASSER PERIOD. ALSO LIKE I HAVE SAID BEFORE THE PATRIOTS HAVE ALWAYS HAD A BETTER ALL AROUND TEAM THEN THE COLTS, PEYTON IS STILL BETTER AT QB.
we always had a better defense but not this year. and there offense was always considered the best and there o-line is better than ours so it goes both ways. u look at all these qb's listed and they all had good o-line, the only qb that can be great without o-lineman are running ones like vick, vince and steve young
Not worth reading again.. you got nothing to argue with me about, all you're saying is "Bradshaw was better cause he played 10 years earlier!" Which will lead me to once again saying.. Get the fuck outta here until you fuckin come up with some knowledgeable shit!!! You soundin like the Steelers version of Deebo!!
To the Official Bitch Made Freak
Your very fuckin' sad with your lack of knowledge regarding the game of football. Like I said before, squares like you only focus on stats rather than common sense of the game. Bradshaw made big plays in the clutch against defenses that were at an advantage back then. You obviously can't seem to get it through your head that not any QB could pull off those victories. Your only argument is that QB's nowdays with comparible stats could have pulled off those same playoff and Super Bowl wins under pressure. Get out of here with your desperate ignorant ass! The sissy ass Qb's nowdays are so over protected by the league, but when under pressure they get rattled (like Brady last Sunday). Bradshaw played under pressure, hurt and lead the Steelers to 4 Super Bowls in 6 years!
The real question nowdays should be "Who has the best Offensive Line"? Without a descent O-Line, no QB is a god like your making Montana, Brady or who ever the fuck out to be! Want to touch on this subject? By the way, has your ass even been on a football field coaching, playing, etc? Please don't tell me your one of these square ass X Box geeks who get's your so called knowledge from sitting on your ass all day and playing Madden!
Your very fuckin' sad with your lack of knowledge regarding the game of football. Like I said before, squares like you only focus on stats rather than common sense of the game. Bradshaw made big plays in the clutch against defenses that were at an advantage back then. You obviously can't seem to get it through your head that not any QB could pull off those victories. Your only argument is that QB's nowdays with comparible stats could have pulled off those same playoff and Super Bowl wins under pressure. Get out of here with your desperate ignorant ass! The sissy ass Qb's nowdays are so over protected by the league, but when under pressure they get rattled (like Brady last Sunday). Bradshaw played under pressure, hurt and lead the Steelers to 4 Super Bowls in 6 years!
The real question nowdays should be "Who has the best Offensive Line"? Without a descent O-Line, no QB is a god like your making Montana, Brady or who ever the fuck out to be! Want to touch on this subject? By the way, has your ass even been on a football field coaching, playing, etc? Please don't tell me your one of these square ass X Box geeks who get's your so called knowledge from sitting on your ass all day and playing Madden!
Yeah exactly. Its hard to determine how good a qb actually is because the qb is the position is one of the most relative positions on the field.
If you have garbage receivers, o-line, and no running game, you could be Montana x Brady + Ron Mexico and still look like shit.
On the other hand, if you have a dominant o-line and great receivers (read pats) you could have Kyle Orton looking like the best qb ever.
How good a qb is has got to be almost 50% dependent on his team. After watching Brady in a game where he was experiencing what most qbs go through on a daily, it is clear he was being carried by his team and not the other way around.
I think you put Peyton in NE and Tom in Indy and for sure Peyton > Tom.