Greatest QB EVER!!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Best QB EVER


  • Total voters
    91
Nov 26, 2007
676
2
0
43
#31
If you're going on stats and their team being successful, its hard to disagree with Otto Graham...crazy stats like 10 years in the league, 7 passing titles, led his team to the championship all ten years winning 7 of them,....But from the ones that i've seen, Montana.
 

Jazzo

Master of Debauchery
Aug 18, 2003
2,582
490
83
Off the Grid
#36
Blonde Bomber

Bradshaw was garbage... he won those super bowls cause of his defense
Bullshit! Terry Bradshaw completed some hard ass passes for big plays and TD's in the playoffs and Super Bowls! This was also in the days when the Defenses were harder to complete passes against. The DB's and LB's could chuck the WR's all they wanted and the league didn't protect the QB like they do nowdays for these pansy QB's. Bradshaw also won four Super Bowls in six years! If you actually saw what he was up against and his performances in big games, you would rethink what you said.

I picked Johnny Unitas, because Terry's name wasn't on the list (I don't know why not!). The old school QB's did way more than the babied QB's that started appearing in the league in the 80's to present.

No one even come at me with some QB statistical ass nerd shit either. Like I said rules have been changed over the years to give an advantage to the offenses nowdays, because these idiotic fans (that don't know a goddamn thing about real football) want too see high scoring! These dumbasses should stick to watching their fake ass WWE wrestling if they want entertainment! Bitches...........
 
Mar 10, 2007
2,603
57
0
39
#37
Wow.. look at what team ur a fan of... get the fuck outta here with that Bradshaw bullshit!! He couldn't read defenses for shit all he would do was throw it deep and hope one of his receivers would come down with it, which would explain to 212-210 TD-INT ratio... But apparently to you stats don't mean nothing right? please.. Sexy Rexy is better then him!
 
May 30, 2006
7,310
71
0
48
#38
I picked Marino cuz I grew up a big Marino fan but honestly there's no such thing as "Greatest Of All Time" cuz players played in totally different eras. Hell, Montana will tell u himself the game was different when he played in 1982 then when he played in 1991. Whenever I see a GOAT poll in any field or proffession it only let's me know that the thread starter don't know shit about the subject that they are talkiing about.

Na d for the record the actual NFL players said that Young was better then Montana. Despite the SB rings Joe got they were all saying Young was better. Jerry Glanville use to tell his players when he coached the Falcons not to hurt Montana cuz he didn't want Young in. That's not taking nothing away from Joe but it is what it is.
 

Jazzo

Master of Debauchery
Aug 18, 2003
2,582
490
83
Off the Grid
#39
Wow.. look at what team ur a fan of... get the fuck outta here with that Bradshaw bullshit!! He couldn't read defenses for shit all he would do was throw it deep and hope one of his receivers would come down with it, which would explain to 212-210 TD-INT ratio... But apparently to you stats don't mean nothing right? please.. Sexy Rexy is better then him!
Squares like you never recognize game above their head. I guess that's what I expected from a stat nerd like yourself....

Rexy? Talk about two different eras! Read what I posted earlier and you would see why it was harder to play the QB position back then. You obviously don't know shit about football. Case closed.....
 
Mar 10, 2007
2,603
57
0
39
#40
I was joking when I said Rexy idiot. Bradshaw is not even top 5, check the stats. Don't come in hear and say stats don't mean nothing either, just makes you sound stupid.