Good win Broncos...now comes the 2nd bye week!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#82
gimpypimp said:
That still doesn't change what I said. And what was the point of saying the same thing again anyway?
Because you were wondering why anyone thought the raiders would beat the Browns. It's because the Brown's were the underdog going into the game. That's why.

gimpypimp said:
from everything I saw, we were favored by 3.
Well I don't know what outlets you were looking into, because everybody else had the raiders favored by 3.

gimpypimp said:
Who really expected the Raiders to win when we beat them everytime we play?
This is the dumbest logic I've ever heard. Teams change every year. But by your logic.. If the raiders were on their way to an undefeated SuperBowl season and were clearly the best team in the league, the big bad Browns would still beat them because they "beat them everytime we play."

LMAO. Yeah. [sarcasm]Makes sense to me.[/sarcasm]
 
May 2, 2002
3,895
163
0
#83
Because you were wondering why anyone thought the raiders would beat the Browns. It's because the Brown's were the underdog going into the game. That's why.
Well...thanks for repeating yourself. You could have just responded to my other post.

Well I don't know what outlets you were looking into, because everybody else had the raiders favored by 3.
And they were all wrong. The ones I looked into were right.

This is the dumbest logic I've ever heard. Teams change every year. But by your logic.. If the raiders were on their way to an undefeated SuperBowl season and were clearly the best team in the league, the big bad Browns would still beat them because they "beat them everytime we play."

LMAO. Yeah. [sarcasm]Makes sense to me.[/sarcasm]
You are such a fag.

You know what I meant...or should have. If the Raiders were that good...or if it was week 10 and they were 9-0, then I wouldn't have said what I said.

But the last few years they have sucked...and we have beaten them. And they didn't make any major improvements in the offseason.

We played them last year and beat them. We are a better team this year and therefore a win again was likely.
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#84
gimpypimp said:
Well...thanks for repeating yourself. You could have just responded to my other post.
I haven't seen your other post. I'm at work, I don't have time to cycle through all the threads to find a worthless post by the likes of yourself.

gimpypimp said:
And they were all wrong. The ones I looked into were right.
Name em. Chances are I saw the same ones, and you're full of shit.

gimpypimp said:
You are such a fag.
LOL what a hoecake. What is it with you and your hatred toward me? You still mad cuz I said your bitch ass team got stomped in week 1? Get a life, and when you do, move on with it.

gimpypimp said:
You know what I meant...or should have. If the Raiders were that good...or if it was week 10 and they were 9-0, then I wouldn't have said what I said.

But the last few years they have sucked...and we have beaten them. And they didn't make any major improvements in the offseason.

We played them last year and beat them. We are a better team this year and therefore a win again was likely.
Now you're trying to cover up your ignorance. The statement you made was as dumb as it gets, I called you on it. Deal with it.
 
May 2, 2002
3,895
163
0
#85
I haven't seen your other post. I'm at work, I don't have time to cycle through all the threads to find a worthless post by the likes of yourself.
But my posts now aren't worthless? Why bother addressing me at all then?

Name em. Chances are I saw the same ones, and you're full of shit.
Okay...I'm full of shit.

LOL what a hoecake. What is it with you and your hatred toward me? You still mad cuz I said your bitch ass team got stomped in week 1? Get a life, and when you do, move on with it.
You mean the game we lost by 5? That isn't getting stomped. You losing 40 something to 0 is getting stomped.

I don't hate you...I don't even know you. What I don't like is that you come across as an asshole.

Now you're trying to cover up your ignorance. The statement you made was as dumb as it gets, I called you on it. Deal with it.
I'm not trying to cover up anything...I know what I meant.
 
Sep 12, 2002
3,030
5
38
#86
ESCOBAR 92113 said:
i aint saying nothing about the raiders being better than the broncos...im simply stating facts, the broncos d has given up more total yards than the raiders d...i cant help that.

bottome line
secondary-broncos
linebackers-push
front line-chargers

either way this is a good debate....should help me pass the time at work tomorrow...peace
points allowed is what matters

check the stats:

http://www.nfl.com/standings

1. chicago- 36 points allowed(5 games)
2. denver- 34 points allowed(4 games)
3. sd- 36 points allowed(4 games)

oakland- 113 points allowed(4 games)
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#87
gimpypimp said:
But my posts now aren't worthless? Why bother addressing me at all then?
They're not worth looking for. The only reason I've responded here is because this was the only thread I was checking when I was at work.



gimpypimp said:
Okay...I'm full of shit.
Well, everyone had Oakland favored by 3. You say different, but you're the only one who says so. As far as I'm concerned, you're full of shit.

gimpypimp said:
You mean the game we lost by 5? That isn't getting stomped. You losing 40 something to 0 is getting stomped.
First of all, your team was never in that game. I don't care what the score was. But second and more importantly, that is the reason you insist on calling me a fag everytime we disagree with eachother. It's a sad thing, but as a fan of the fuckin Browns I can't expect much more from you.

gimpypimp said:
I don't hate you...I don't even know you. What I don't like is that you come across as an asshole.
That's life. You're not expected to like everyone, but most people don't immediately resort to childish name calling. You do it right off the bat.. I can make a normal statement that wouldn't offend anyone and if you don't agree I get a response similar to "You're such a fag."

Grow up homie. If you're gonna start flapping your chops at least wait until I say something offensive, and then call me whatever you want.