Good win Broncos...now comes the 2nd bye week!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

EDJ

Sicc OG
May 3, 2002
11,608
234
63
www.myspace.com
#61
gimpypimp said:
Why is too much credit? The Chargers are a good team.

Push means even.
I DON'T BELIEVE THERE DEFENSE IS AS gOOD AS #1 AND THAT "THERE FRONT FOUR BLOWS OURS AWAY" LIKE THA SCARY 1 STRESSED IT. I BELIEVE IT'S EVEN. DON'T gET ME WRONg, THE CHARgERS HAVE A gOOD SQUAD AND I'LL gIVE PROPS. BUT WE SHUT DOWN WHAT THEY COULDN'T.

AND DEFENSE CAN'T BE BROKEN DOWN AND SEPERATED CAUSE IT'S LIKE A WELL OILED MACHINE. AND I BELIEVE OURS IS RUNNIN' A LITTLE BETTER. JUST LIKE THEY OFFENSE IS RUNNIN' A LITTLE BETTER.
 
May 2, 2002
3,895
163
0
#65
ESCOBAR 92113 said:
i thought for sure they would win week 3.....
Well week 3 was a bye...but if you were talkin' about Cleveland...Cleveland beat the Raiders the last few times they've played.

I don't know why this year would be any different.
 
Oct 31, 2003
4,485
824
0
48
SAN DIEGO
SOUTHEASTSANDIEGO.COM
#66
EDJ said:
I DON'T BELIEVE THERE DEFENSE IS AS gOOD AS #1 AND THAT "THERE FRONT FOUR BLOWS OURS AWAY" LIKE THA SCARY 1 STRESSED IT. I BELIEVE IT'S EVEN. DON'T gET ME WRONg, THE CHARgERS HAVE A gOOD SQUAD AND I'LL gIVE PROPS. BUT WE SHUT DOWN WHAT THEY COULDN'T.

AND DEFENSE CAN'T BE BROKEN DOWN AND SEPERATED CAUSE IT'S LIKE A WELL OILED MACHINE. AND I BELIEVE OURS IS RUNNIN' A LITTLE BETTER. JUST LIKE THEY OFFENSE IS RUNNIN' A LITTLE BETTER.
so you think your defense is better just because you beat the baltimore?......

LET ME JUST PUT THIS IN PERSPECTIVE...YOU BEAT BALTIMORE IN YOUR HOUSE, ON SOME BAD WEATHER IN WHICH BALTIMORE TURNED THE BALL OVER 3 TIMES..........PROPS FOR THAT.

BALTIMORE GAINED 257 TOTAL YDS AGAINST DENVER (IN DENVER)
BALTIMORE GAINED 206 TOTAL YDS AGAINST SAN DIEGO(IN BALTIMORE)

SAN DIEGO IS RANKED #1 IN TOTAL DEFENSE ALLOWING 204.5 YDS PER GAME
DENVER IS RANKED #12 IN TOTAL DEFENSE ALLOWING 305.8 YDS PER GAME
COMPARE THAT TO THE RAIDERS WHO ARE RANKED 10TH ALLOWING 294.8 YDS PER GAME
 

EDJ

Sicc OG
May 3, 2002
11,608
234
63
www.myspace.com
#68
ESCOBAR,
gIVE ME ALL THE STATS YOU WANT. BUT OUR RED ZONE DEFENSE IS NOT ALLOWIN' THAT MANY POINTS AND AT THE END OF THE DAY, THAT'S WHAT MATTERS. BUT YEAH, BALTIMORE DIDN'T SCORE ON US, CAUSE WE SHUT IT DOWN. THEY WERE ABLE TO DRIVE ON YAW WHEN IT REALLY MATTERED.

SO ACCORDIN' TO THE NUMBERS YOU PRESENTED AND LOgIC, THE RAIDERS HAVE A BETTER DEFENSE THAN US? YET THEY ARE WINLESS AND TEAMS ARE COMIN' BAK ON THEY ASS AFTER LEADIN' IN THE HALF.
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#69
EDJ said:
SO ACCORDIN' TO THE NUMBERS YOU PRESENTED AND LOgIC, THE RAIDERS HAVE A BETTER DEFENSE THAN US? YET THEY ARE WINLESS AND TEAMS ARE COMIN' BAK ON THEY ASS AFTER LEADIN' IN THE HALF.
Cuz their offense is horrible. Sooner or later the D will get worn down.

But I think Denver's D is better than Oakland's, regardless of rank.
 
Oct 31, 2003
4,485
824
0
48
SAN DIEGO
SOUTHEASTSANDIEGO.COM
#75
EDJ said:
ESCOBAR,
gIVE ME ALL THE STATS YOU WANT. BUT OUR RED ZONE DEFENSE IS NOT ALLOWIN' THAT MANY POINTS AND AT THE END OF THE DAY, THAT'S WHAT MATTERS. BUT YEAH, BALTIMORE DIDN'T SCORE ON US, CAUSE WE SHUT IT DOWN. THEY WERE ABLE TO DRIVE ON YAW WHEN IT REALLY MATTERED.

SO ACCORDIN' TO THE NUMBERS YOU PRESENTED AND LOgIC, THE RAIDERS HAVE A BETTER DEFENSE THAN US? YET THEY ARE WINLESS AND TEAMS ARE COMIN' BAK ON THEY ASS AFTER LEADIN' IN THE HALF.
i aint saying nothing about the raiders being better than the broncos...im simply stating facts, the broncos d has given up more total yards than the raiders d...i cant help that.

bottome line
secondary-broncos
linebackers-push
front line-chargers

either way this is a good debate....should help me pass the time at work tomorrow...peace
 

EDJ

Sicc OG
May 3, 2002
11,608
234
63
www.myspace.com
#78
ESCOBAR 92113 said:
i aint saying nothing about the raiders being better than the broncos...im simply stating facts, the broncos d has given up more total yards than the raiders d...i cant help that.

bottome line
secondary-broncos
linebackers-push
front line-chargers

either way this is a good debate....should help me pass the time at work tomorrow...peace
BUT BY YOUR LOgIC, THE RAIDERS "D" IS BETTER THAN OUR "D". LET ME ASK YOU THIS, BY WHAT DO YOU MEASURE THE "D"? JUST STATS OF YARDS ALLOWED?
 
May 2, 2002
3,895
163
0
#79
FATAL NYGHTMARE said:
The raiders were actually favored and expected to win that game. It will probably be the only game the raiders are favored in all season.
That still doesn't change what I said. And what was the point of saying the same thing again anyway?

You said the same thing in that other thread too...and as I said there...from everything I saw, we were favored by 3.

Who really expected the Raiders to win when we beat them everytime we play?
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
403
83
#80
Solitary 1 said:
JETS, HOUSTON WE SHOULD WIN, AND I THINK WE'LL HANDLE AZ..

WE MIGHT SPLIT WITH THE CHIEFS AND GO 4-12 AGAIN!

CALL IT A GUT FEELING.

LOL

you are not beating the jets, and depending on how well lienert learns in the next couple of games you will not beat AZ either. If Green is back for KC you are not beating them, so maybe houston......but......Houston as Gary Kubiack who knows from Shanny how to handle the Raiders.