Floyd Mayweather Sr.: I'd rather for my son not fight Pacquiao, and I have my own rea

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
46
#9
Pacquiao is the pussy to be honest. He doesn't fight top fighters coming off of wins. When Shane was at the top of the WW division and asking for Pacquiao, Pacquiao ducked Mosley and fought fought Clottey and Margarito. Neither one of them were at the top. Mosley wanted Pacquiao at 147, but Roach said that it would have to be at a catchweight of 142 (even though he fought De La Hoya at 147) and that Mosley was "too big" (even though they fought Margarito at 150). Team Pacquiao is always looking for some kind of advantage or they'll just come up with a sorry excuse, like when Pacquiao said "I don't think the fans want to see that fight" when he was asked about a 3rd fight with Marquez.

Now that Berto is at the top and is an undefeated champion coming off of KO win(s), Pacquiao is probably going to fight Mosley. Since Berto hasn't done anything to earn a shot at Pacquiao (like Clottey and Margarito did anyting to earn a shot)

Pacquiao's the true pussy, who can't even answer questions on his own without saying "talk to my promoter".

LOL at Pussyuiao
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
46
#11
Berto is an undefeated, title holder.... he's a Champion. What more does he have to prove? Where is he currently ranked in terms of ranking? He has to be higher than Mosley at this point.
 
Feb 8, 2006
2,617
1,373
0
40
#12
even if he is ranked higher what does that mean, he doesnt take chances and is being protected by his team. Berto got his fucken belt on some bullshit. compare his resume to any of the top fighters and tell me you wouldnt laugh
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
46
#13
It means that it would be a more competitive fight than old as Shane who can't get out of the way when his opponents throw punches.

Berto is young, has speed and reflexes, pretty good power.

Pac's fans don't want to see Pacquiao lose, so they come up with excuses. And people call Floyd void, they should be calling Pac, void.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,800
113
43
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#16
Pacquiao is the pussy to be honest. He doesn't fight top fighters coming off of wins. When Shane was at the top of the WW division and asking for Pacquiao, Pacquiao ducked Mosley and fought fought Clottey and Margarito.
Your time frame is off.

Pacquiao fought welterweight title holder Miguel Cotto, who beat Shane Mosley.

Additionally, Pacquiao was moving up from 140 pounds and was not even a welterweight yet.

When he fought Clottey, that was a result of a failed negotiation attempt with Floyd Mayweather. Shane Mosley and Andre Berto were scheduled to fight eachother and Clottey was the highest ranked available welterweight at the time.

It's funny though because the anger and hatrid and even jealousy is so obvious in your posts, it's actually kind of sad. None of this would even be a reality if floyd would just stop taking these absurd "vacations" and fight pacquiao like the entire planet wants him to do. So instead, we have to argue of who of these lesser opponents (mosley, berto or marquez) are best for pacquiao when the reality is, none of them are. There is only one guy that pacquiao needs to be fighting but unfortunately that guy doesn't want to fight.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,800
113
43
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#17
Berto is an undefeated, title holder.... he's a Champion. What more does he have to prove? Where is he currently ranked in terms of ranking? He has to be higher than Mosley at this point.
Vyacheslav Senchenko is an undefeated welterweight title holder, who actually has a better record then Berto (29-0). Should pacquiao fight him?

Listen, Berto/Senchenko, they are paper champs. Berto won a vacant belt by beating Miguel Rodriguez, LOL, and defended that paper belt by fighting 140 pounders like stevie forbes and Juan Urango. The only B level fighter he fought (Luis Collazo) he arguably lost.

So the point that Berto has earned a shot is absurd.

You can make the case that it would be a BETTER fight than Mosley, but neither SHOULD be fighting pacquiao. It should be Mayweather, period.
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
46
#18
Vyacheslav Senchenko is an undefeated welterweight title holder, who actually has a better record then Berto (29-0). Should pacquiao fight him?

Listen, Berto/Senchenko, they are paper champs. Berto won a vacant belt by beating Miguel Rodriguez, LOL, and defended that paper belt by fighting 140 pounders like stevie forbes and Juan Urango. The only B level fighter he fought (Luis Collazo) he arguably lost.

So the point that Berto has earned a shot is absurd.

You can make the case that it would be a BETTER fight than Mosley, but neither SHOULD be fighting pacquiao. It should be Mayweather, period.
Lol at Bob Arum "The casual boxing fan knows who Shane Mosley is", let me correct that. "The casual boxing fan knows who Shane Mosley was".

The point that Berto has earned a shot is absurd? Lol.... Berto would expose Pacquiao. Pacquiao can be beaten, his team knows it..... that's why they're cherrypickin'....
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#19
Lol at Bob Arum "The casual boxing fan knows who Shane Mosley is", let me correct that. "The casual boxing fan knows who Shane Mosley was".

The point that Berto has earned a shot is absurd? Lol.... Berto would expose Pacquiao. Pacquiao can be beaten, his team knows it..... that's why they're cherrypickin'....
Cherrypickin'?

You just avoided every valid point 206 made. From your timing being off to Berto earning a shot, you've avoided it.

You're just like your master Floyd.