First-grader suspended for sex harassment

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

MAVA

Sicc OG
Jul 18, 2005
4,228
16
0
www.gifsoup.com
#1
Berthena Dorinvil says the suspension of her son is outrageous.



BROCKTON, Massachusetts. (AP) -- A 6-year-old boy is getting a lesson on the meaning of sexual harassment long before he'll be able to spell it.
The first-grader was suspended for three days for sexual harassment after he put two fingers inside a classmate's waistband, school officials told his mother, Berthena Dorinvil. The boy told her he only touched the girl's shirt after the girl touched him.
Experts say only in rare, troubling cases can children that young truly sexually harass one another. (Watch why the mother says she can't explain it to her son -- 1:27)
"The connotation is you're getting some kind of sexual gratification, or wanting sexual gratification, or are putting pressure on for some kind of sexual gratification, when a 6-year-old doesn't have that capacity," said E. Christopher Murray, a civil rights attorney who has handled school discipline cases.
Dr. Elizabeth Berger, a Philadelphia-area child psychiatrist, said this case seems to be an overzealous attempt to ensure students feel safe in school after years in which society was not attentive enough.
The boy's mother called the January 30 suspension from Downey Elementary School outrageous. She said she can't even explain to her son what he did wrong because he's too young to understand.
"He doesn't know those things," she told The Enterprise of Brockton. "He's only 6 years old."
Brockton school officials have not commented beyond a statement from Superintendent Basan Nembirkow that said sexual harassment charges are always investigated and officials are trained to deal with them.
The Brockton School Committee defines sexual harassment among students, in part, as "uninvited physical contact such as touching, hugging, patting or pinching."
First-graders who repeatedly touch classmates need to be disciplined and taught what's appropriate, said Nan Stein, a senior research scientist at the Center for Research on Women at Wellesley College. But don't call the apparent discipline problem "sexual harassment" because first-graders just don't get it, she said.
There have been similar cases. In 1996, a New York second-grader was suspended for kissing a girl and ripping a button off her skirt -- an idea the boy said he got from his favorite book "Corduroy," about a bear with a missing button. Earlier that year, a Lexington, North Carolina, 6-year-old was separated from his class after kissing a classmate on the cheek.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/EDUCATION/02/09/sex.harass.ap/index.html

Racist principle probably. The kid probably touched a White girl.

That was my first thought
 
Dec 17, 2005
1,172
0
0
39
#3
MAVA said:
"uninvited physical contact such as touching, hugging, patting or pinching."
damn skools r gettin to stricted even high skool teachers dont let them touch hug flirt or whatever i think cuz they never get no ass in high skool and now they taken it out on the students
 
Nov 21, 2005
5,793
5
0
43
www.revver.com
#6
that's some dumb shit...
dumb mutha fuckaz in this world these days.. lol

in my day.. when stuff like that happened
in first grade.the teacher wouild tell a kid
you're not supposed to be doing that..and then they would just stop../
but they didn't suspend them.. that;s some bullshit...

they didn't even suspend when i was playing poker..
and betting in the hallways of my elementary school..
they just stole all my shit.. and my cards...
but no suspension...

i bet they'd suspend kids for that shit now.. lol
 
Sep 30, 2005
799
0
0
42
#7
Why does shit like that only happen in the US? I'm saying, there's not one other country where shit like that could go down, not one.
I gotta admit, my first thought when I tried to find a logical explanation for how a kid could be accused of sexual harassment for something so inoffensive was that the kid had to be black or latino. It's fucked up that I ended up being right. I wish I hadn't been, but it just goes to show how shit works to this day. I mean kids touch other a little, it's just natural to them and there's absolutely no sexual intention behind it, whoever thought it made sense to actually accuse a 6 year old of sexual harassment doesn't need a job. And on a side not, how "pinching" and "hugging" have come to be seen as sexual harassment is beyond me. It's gotten out of hands.
 

MKB

Sicc OG
Dec 19, 2002
999
0
36
39
#8
It would have been a hell of a lot easier to tell him hey thats wrong dont do that and left it at that how the hell are you gonna suspend a 6 year old over this?