FBI Will Be Jacked Into Everyone's Internets On May 14

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Y-S

Sicc OG
Dec 10, 2005
3,765
0
0
#1
Reminder: Monday is Wiretap the Internet Day

May 14th is the official deadline for cable modem companies, DSL providers, broadband over powerline, satellite internet companies and some universities to finish wiring up their networks with FBI-friendly surveillance gear, to comply with the FCC's expanded interpretation of the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act.

Congress passed CALEA in 1994 to help FBI eavesdroppers deal with digital telecom technology. The law required phone companies to make their networks easier to wiretap. The results: on mobile phone networks, where CALEA tech has 100% penetration, it's credited with boosting the number of court-approved wiretaps a carrier can handle simultaneously, and greatly shortening the time it takes to get a wiretap going. Cops can now start listening in less than a day.

Now that speed and efficiency is coming to internet surveillance. While CALEA is all about phones, the Justice Department began lobbying the FCC in 2002 to reinterpret the law as applying to the internet as well. The commission obliged, and last June a divided federal appeals court upheld the expansion 2-1. (The dissenting judge called the FCC's position "gobbledygook." But he was outnumbered.)

So, if you're a broadband provider (separately, some VOIP companies are covered too) … Hurry! The deadline has already passed to file an FCC form 445 (.pdf), certifying that you're on schedule, or explaining why you're not. You can also find the 68-page official industry spec for internet surveillance here. It'll cost you $164.00 to download, but then you'll know exactly what format to use when delivering customer packets to federal or local law enforcement, including "e-mail, instant messaging records, web-browsing information and other information sent or received through a user's broadband connection, including on-line banking activity."

There are also third party brokers who will handle all this for you for a fee.

It's worth noting that the new requirements don't alter the legal standards for law enforcement to win court orders for internet wiretaps. Fans of CALEA expansion argue that it therefore won't increase the number of Americans under surveillance.

That's wrong, of course. Making surveillance easier and faster gives law enforcement agencies of all stripes more reason to eschew old-fashioned police work in favor of spying. The telephone CALEA compliance deadline was in 2002, and since then the amount of court-ordered surveillance has nearly doubled from 2,586 applications granted that year, to 4,015 orders in 2006.

http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/05/reminder_monday.html

http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/05/13/053252
 
Nov 21, 2005
5,793
5
0
43
www.revver.com
#7
So, if you're a broadband provider (separately, some VOIP companies are covered too) … Hurry! The deadline has already passed to file an FCC form 445 (.pdf), certifying that you're on schedule, or explaining why you're not. You can also find the 68-page official industry spec for internet surveillance here. It'll cost you $164.00 to download,

That sounds like a scam... anything where they ask for money for info on the net is a scam..

Yeah they still have to get court orders to spy on people though. Plus I hope most companies don;t comply...

Comcast and Yahoo broadband have been part of this for a while though. I would never buy their service.
 

Y-S

Sicc OG
Dec 10, 2005
3,765
0
0
#11
It's all over google

Law enforcment access to Internet communications expanded

Cyberspace became more transparent today.

Effective today, broadband providers and Internet phone companies must open their networks for lawful intercepts of e-mails, calls and other electronic communications.

Authorities hail the move as an important step to combat terrorism and crime. Critics call it another erosion of personal freedoms.

The new rules mark an expansion of government surveillance capabilities first aimed at mobile phones in 1994, in a law called CALEA, short for the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act.

As the Web took off, the Justice Department grew concerned that criminals were going online to evade wiretaps. So the Federal Communications Commission in 2005 reinterpreted the law to include the Internet, a controversial ruling upheld last year by a federal appeals court panel in a 2-1 vote.

Companies had until today to devise, at their own expense, technical "back doors" for court-approved interceptions of digital communications. Non-compliance can bring fines of $10,000 per day.

"Today's compliance deadline marks an important milestone," ensuring that authorities can conduct "lawfully authorized electronic surveillance regardless of changes in communications services or technologies," said FBI spokesman Paul Bresson.

The FCC had no statistics on how many broadband companies are in compliance. But Bresson indicated they may have some leeway. The FBI "is aware the industry has worked toward meeting its obligations under the law and looks forward to more progress from a number of different industry segments," he said via e-mail.

Broadband companies are complying to avoid fines, said Dave McClure, president of the Internet Industry Association of America, which includes AT&T and mom-and-pop Internet providers among its 150 members.

Critics of the move include Kevin Poulsen, a former hacker and a blogger at Wired.com. "Making surveillance easier and faster gives law enforcement of all stripes more reason to eschew old-fashioned police work in favor of spying," Poulsen wrote.

http://blog.nj.com/ledgerupdates/2007/05/law_enforcment_access_to_inter.html
 
C

CcytzO_Loc

Guest
#13
3xLaZY said:
can somebody translate this into english...what does this mean exactly???


they gone be on our ass for saying kill bush and blow up buildings and fucc the government.....

probably gonna be easier for them to trace people pirating software and media.....and may be easier to catch haccers.....but the more technology they get the more criminals get......
 

Y-S

Sicc OG
Dec 10, 2005
3,765
0
0
#14
What do you think of this -

"If you don't do anything illegal or bad, then you got nothing to worry about, then it's fine"?
 
Nov 21, 2005
5,793
5
0
43
www.revver.com
#19
THis is pretty much bullshit. Its not as if the NSA has ben illegally spying on people without warrents. This is nothing new.

Plus they use keyword software to record things said through the phones. But there is NO WAY they have enough people to time to go through everyone's convos. They only get keywords.. and gain peices of intelligence...

They've had so many secret programs running to watch people online and on the phone. .that this law is a joke and pretty useless.. If anything this will give local cops more power to spy on people etc...

But yeah I agree with ccyzto fuck the gov and New World Order..

well not everyone in gov. Just the Illuminists. I do got love and support Ron Paul in 2008! He's only guy running for presidents who gives a fuck about our freedoms, rights and privacy. Not to mentions he opposes the North American Union.. and he hates the IRS.

If anyone cares about their rights or freedoms vote for Ron Paul 08!

If you want to be a slave in the coming years.. for for Hillary or any of those other Illuminits, Elite pieces of trash.. the choice is yours!

Ron Paul:

Opposes a REAL ID care and Microchips in humans

Oppposes a North American Union

Opposes Warentless churches and internet survelielence..

He opposes the government regulating or controling the internet

He opposes high taxes and IRS

He opposed, still opposes, and will stop the war in Iraq..
and bring the troops home

He also wants to LEAGALIZE WEED!!

That alone should get 99% of the siccness to vote for him!!

If he wins.. i can promise you he will be the best president you ever had

Here is a video of him destorying everyone at the Debates!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgjI_WROg6w&eurl=http://www.myspace.com/congressmanronpaul

This is what Hillary Clinton wants the US to be like:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h3G-lMZxjo

If you want this abuse of power like this law to stop..

then vote Ron Paul... other wise.. we all need to move to some remote islands or something... Jamaica would be cool


I like Ron Paul's visions of the US better.