DOES THE U.S.................?
- Thread starter DASICCLV702
- Start date
that was over 50 years ago....and both of those nukes obviously got blown up...just because you know how to make kool aid doesn't mean it always has to be in your fridge...all of you guys preach about "admitting you don't know it all is where wisdom starts"....all im saying is nobody here has any kind of evidence that any country has nukes, whatever we know is all hearsay...or reading some bs online article, im almost positive nobody here is an international spy and has been inside of any countries weapons manufacturers.....
Can you guys even fathem how many countries would drop a nuke on the US if they had one......so many people hate us and would love to do that....Osama Bin Laden would of done it but he obviously didn't have the resources to get a nuke and obviously didn't have one. He's one of the biggest terrorist leaders and has a world known hatred for the US and has had that hatred long before 9/11. In all likelyhood yes the US has at least one nuke....but none of us know that for sure...its suppose to be considered common sense because we've dropped nukes on Japan 50 years ago and we've experimented with blowing up nukes in AZ and NM. The government caught hella shit for that too, just because we know how to build a nuke doesn't mean we have them on stock....
LMAO!
You SHOULD!
You don't have to be a spy to believe the information given by CREDIBLE scientist who develop the weapons, CREDIBLE workers who work at the nuclear facilities, CREDIBLE millitary personal who oversea the development, CREDIBLE reports given by those who HAVE been in the places where the weapons are made. What about the ADMISSION of countries such as America and Russia?
If no one can prove that the US or anyone else has nukes that means EVERYTHING that has ever been said about nukes (since the bombing of japan) is 100% False.
My friend if you believe this you are an idiot. See, junior, they don't let dummies like you into nuke spots because you'll end up blowing your face up. They won't let people like me in because I'll probably aim them at people like you. The point is ONLY an IDIOT would make the same claim that you did lol!
Einstein, you don't have to launch or drop a nuke on the US if you have one. If you have a SUITCASE NUKE you can place it WHEREVER you want and detonate it. By your logic one is to assume that because the US hasn't got hit with a nuke yet that they must not exist. I won't even begin to tell you how retarded this sounds.
What are you basing your assumption on? I say the world has nukes based on REPORTS from credible sources, BUDGETS & SPENDING, nuke bills/laws, PICTURES, reports from SCIENTISTS, WEAPONS EXPERTS and Military personal. You are basing your belief on not being a spy, the bombing of japan and the fact that teh us hasn't got hit with one yet. You sound like a dummy my friend and I say that as I am falling out of my chair in laughter.
Finally, if no one has Nukes please explain the Cuban Missile crisis or The Star Wars Program.
You SHOULD!
You don't have to be a spy to believe the information given by CREDIBLE scientist who develop the weapons, CREDIBLE workers who work at the nuclear facilities, CREDIBLE millitary personal who oversea the development, CREDIBLE reports given by those who HAVE been in the places where the weapons are made. What about the ADMISSION of countries such as America and Russia?
If no one can prove that the US or anyone else has nukes that means EVERYTHING that has ever been said about nukes (since the bombing of japan) is 100% False.
My friend if you believe this you are an idiot. See, junior, they don't let dummies like you into nuke spots because you'll end up blowing your face up. They won't let people like me in because I'll probably aim them at people like you. The point is ONLY an IDIOT would make the same claim that you did lol!
Einstein, you don't have to launch or drop a nuke on the US if you have one. If you have a SUITCASE NUKE you can place it WHEREVER you want and detonate it. By your logic one is to assume that because the US hasn't got hit with a nuke yet that they must not exist. I won't even begin to tell you how retarded this sounds.
What are you basing your assumption on? I say the world has nukes based on REPORTS from credible sources, BUDGETS & SPENDING, nuke bills/laws, PICTURES, reports from SCIENTISTS, WEAPONS EXPERTS and Military personal. You are basing your belief on not being a spy, the bombing of japan and the fact that teh us hasn't got hit with one yet. You sound like a dummy my friend and I say that as I am falling out of my chair in laughter.
Finally, if no one has Nukes please explain the Cuban Missile crisis or The Star Wars Program.
All I said to begin with, is nobody HERE on THIS SITE, can prove that any country has nukes. Just because you say you know I'm suppose to believe that!! I never said they didn't exist at the moment. You are the the dummy for attacking me and not understanding my one little sentence. You still don't know, you know what your "credible sources" tell you. Are those "credible sources" the same ones that work for the Government, because that is truly hilarious. I wouldn't trust anything our Government says. Of course our Goverment would tell the world we have nukes ready to be dropped...it puts fear in other countries. Have we had to drop any nuclear bombs since Japan?
"You're basing your belief on not being a spy."
The only belief I expressed to begin with was that NOBODY here on this site has any proof (pictures, documents, video) that a nuclear bomb is built and ready to be set anywhere in the world. Thats all I said, think about it, its a nuclear bomb...the one thing that, if enough we're built, could end ALL existence.
Now I'm going to Reno to fuckin get drunk and high and gamble all my money...I'd love to argue about pointless shit and how much none of us really dont know, but I have to roll....
1. Do YOU know everyone here on this site? How do YOU know some of teh people here don't WORK for the government OR have family members who work for the government?
2. Can YOU prove that no one on this site can prove that any country has nukes?
3. What do you require as proof?
My comrade 206 posted a link to a site that gave a list of countries with nukes and even listed the name and types of nukes.
Only a dummy would have typed the sentence. Don't confuse me with you.
Listen, junior and listen well because this needs to sink into your head. You can be a CREDIBLE source and still work for the government. Look at the credible sources who worked for the government and told Bush Iraq did NOT have weapons of mass destruction. Look at UNBIASED inspectors who go in and survey the plants. Again, if america (or anyone else) does not have nukes explain the Cuban Missile crisis and the Star Wars program.
If america dropped a nuke on japan why would it STOP manufacturing nukes? You are an idiot. What you are saying is since no one has been killed by a nuke since japan they must not exist. LMAO!!!!! Maybe the reason why america has NOT dropped a nuke on another country is because of AGREEMENTS and NUCLEAR PROFILATION. Maybe the reason is because america has not had a NEED to drop another one. I hope you realize these "maybes" are high in sarcasm, but I seriously doubt you'll grasp this.
You are a dumb ass. The pictures in the following link must be from a movie. Better yet they are vehicles used for shoveling bullshit!
http://images.google.com/images?svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&q=TOPOL+M
How do YOU know NOBODY on here here has any proof?
THATS WHY THEY HAVE AGREEMENTS TO CURB NUCLEAR PRODUCTION YOU DUMB ASS!!!!!!
LMAO@ THE THOUGHT OF ONLY ONE BOMB BEING MADE.
You are a perfect example of when the internet goes wrong and everything in your life goes bad. I hope you loose all your money in reno.
:dead:
2. Can YOU prove that no one on this site can prove that any country has nukes?
3. What do you require as proof?
My comrade 206 posted a link to a site that gave a list of countries with nukes and even listed the name and types of nukes.
Only a dummy would have typed the sentence. Don't confuse me with you.
Listen, junior and listen well because this needs to sink into your head. You can be a CREDIBLE source and still work for the government. Look at the credible sources who worked for the government and told Bush Iraq did NOT have weapons of mass destruction. Look at UNBIASED inspectors who go in and survey the plants. Again, if america (or anyone else) does not have nukes explain the Cuban Missile crisis and the Star Wars program.
If america dropped a nuke on japan why would it STOP manufacturing nukes? You are an idiot. What you are saying is since no one has been killed by a nuke since japan they must not exist. LMAO!!!!! Maybe the reason why america has NOT dropped a nuke on another country is because of AGREEMENTS and NUCLEAR PROFILATION. Maybe the reason is because america has not had a NEED to drop another one. I hope you realize these "maybes" are high in sarcasm, but I seriously doubt you'll grasp this.
You are a dumb ass. The pictures in the following link must be from a movie. Better yet they are vehicles used for shoveling bullshit!
http://images.google.com/images?svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&q=TOPOL+M
How do YOU know NOBODY on here here has any proof?
THATS WHY THEY HAVE AGREEMENTS TO CURB NUCLEAR PRODUCTION YOU DUMB ASS!!!!!!
LMAO@ THE THOUGHT OF ONLY ONE BOMB BEING MADE.
You are a perfect example of when the internet goes wrong and everything in your life goes bad. I hope you loose all your money in reno.
:dead:
I seriously didn't think you'd take my one comment to the heart like that...I'm not here to prove anybody wrong or make anyone "look" dumb...or even name call even though I did call you a dummy. Thats all off the point, if you really thought I was serious about my comment then don't you think I would of posted AT LEAST a few paragraphs to back my statement. The only reason I didn't is because I truly honestly don't give one fuck about this thread, I just seen a person ask a question and hella cats attacking this one cat and call him stupid and blazzay blah so I posted one short sentence that reads.."nobody on this board truly knows if any country has nukes." I obviously got you focused on it. Did I say I believe (me, myself) that we do NOT have nukes, dog, of course we have nukes, I never said once that we didn't. So you took my 7-12 words I typed and made an off-target assumption about my beliefs. I'm making an assumption that nobody that post in the message boards of the last remaining sanctuary for gangsta rap has actually seen, with their own eyes, in front of them, a nuclear bomb.
I did not take it to heart. I simply questioned your logic and statement.
No. If you were not serious why make the claim to begin with? You DID make an ATTEMPT to validate your claim by providing several posts AFTER you start being sliced and diced.
Your claim that he was attacked by "hella cats" is 100% false. You did not see "hella cats" attacking that man. What you saw was hella cats giving him INFO, LINKS and ANSWERS to his question. Go back and read it, sport. The ONLY thing that MIGHT be considered an attack is the ONE post that mentioned bears and rabbits.
No, being bored after finishing up an english 4 paper allowed me to focus on it. Now ask yourself a question. Was I focused on your idea as a whole or the STUPIDITY of it?
No, but what you do is say things like this, "In all likelyhood yes the US has at least one nuke....but none of us know that for sure." This is pure circle talk AND you have nothing to support it. You have NO PROOF of what the people on this board know or who they work for. The ONLY person you can give an account for is yourself.
No I did not make an off target assumption. Go back and READ the posts I made.
Lets look at your statement one more time:
Child, your ENTIRE statement falls by the way side because of three important questions.
1. Do YOU know everyone here on this site? How do YOU know some of the people here don't WORK for the government OR have family members who work for the government?
2. Can YOU prove that no one on this site can prove that any country has nukes?
3. What do you require as proof?
All of these questions are based on your statement. Please answer them.
Child, this is different from your initial statement. Your initial statement deals with proof of who has nukes. If I tell you "I SAW A NUKE" on what grounds can I validate the claim? The fact that I CLAIM to have seen one? So what if this is the self proclaimed last remaining sanctuary for gangsta rap, WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH SOMEONE HERE HAVING PROOF OF A NUKE? Your position has no consistancy and does not follow in a logical order.
No. If you were not serious why make the claim to begin with? You DID make an ATTEMPT to validate your claim by providing several posts AFTER you start being sliced and diced.
Your claim that he was attacked by "hella cats" is 100% false. You did not see "hella cats" attacking that man. What you saw was hella cats giving him INFO, LINKS and ANSWERS to his question. Go back and read it, sport. The ONLY thing that MIGHT be considered an attack is the ONE post that mentioned bears and rabbits.
No, being bored after finishing up an english 4 paper allowed me to focus on it. Now ask yourself a question. Was I focused on your idea as a whole or the STUPIDITY of it?
No, but what you do is say things like this, "In all likelyhood yes the US has at least one nuke....but none of us know that for sure." This is pure circle talk AND you have nothing to support it. You have NO PROOF of what the people on this board know or who they work for. The ONLY person you can give an account for is yourself.
No I did not make an off target assumption. Go back and READ the posts I made.
Lets look at your statement one more time:
Child, your ENTIRE statement falls by the way side because of three important questions.
1. Do YOU know everyone here on this site? How do YOU know some of the people here don't WORK for the government OR have family members who work for the government?
2. Can YOU prove that no one on this site can prove that any country has nukes?
3. What do you require as proof?
All of these questions are based on your statement. Please answer them.
Child, this is different from your initial statement. Your initial statement deals with proof of who has nukes. If I tell you "I SAW A NUKE" on what grounds can I validate the claim? The fact that I CLAIM to have seen one? So what if this is the self proclaimed last remaining sanctuary for gangsta rap, WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH SOMEONE HERE HAVING PROOF OF A NUKE? Your position has no consistancy and does not follow in a logical order.