You pose nothing.
You don't even know a JeffK paragraph when you see it. JeffK is E-infamous, friend. Go make a thread in the Open Forum asking "Who is JeffK?" and watch what happens. All the people considered to be "top"-level status on this board--DJ Mark 7, mustynutz, Fridge, etc.--will all most likely know who he is. You are not in their category. You are oblivious and inexperienced.
Take this here for example:
"tell me what constitutes a news worthy article..id like to also kno what other media "pushed" this story cuz only place ive heard it discussd was on here and bernie ward "
This is a 35 second Google News search. But did you do it? No. Because you don't know what Google News is? We cannot be sure. But the fact of the matter is, you didn't do the job and you didn't put in the work. And yet and still, you expect me to do the kind of work that would entail these searches, when it is you that has the problem with what I am saying?
That is not the protocol. The protocol is, research first, talk shit later. If you don't like someone else's shit talk.....research first, talk shit later. But don't sit here with this "Well, I've only heard about this story on AOL and from my friend Bob, so that must mean the media is suppressing it." Go out there and do the research, or if you don't know where to begin, start by humbling yourself to me and requesting names of the sites to check out first.
Friend, the bottom line is that you aren't about anything. You say nothing of any importance. You don't speak of JeffK or Goatse or YMMV. You don't drop names like WikiPedia or The Onion. You know nothing of the internets. You suck at the intarweb.
