Despite grief, he opposes death penalty Mass. father's son was brutally slain

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jul 10, 2002
2,180
18
0
45
#1
Despite grief, he opposes death penalty
Mass. father's son was brutally slain

By RAY DUCKLER
Monitor columnist
March 13, 2010

Bob Curley wasn't always against the death penalty.

But he is now.

It doesn't matter that his 10-year-old son, Jeffrey, was killed, then
sexually abused, 13 years ago. It doesn't matter that Curley still wakes
up every so often and thinks about killing the killers, Salvatore Sicari
and Charles Jaynes. And it doesn't matter that his ex-wife and their two
sons believe in the death penalty.

"After what happened with Jeff, I don't see how I could feel any other
way than being in favor of the death penalty," Curley said yesterday.
"But after a period of time . . . that changed."

Curley is a 54-year-old firefighter from Cambridge, Mass. He came to
Concord yesterday to address the Death Penalty Study Commission, which
is researching whether capital punishment, on the books in New
Hampshire, makes more sense than life without parole.

The committee and some invited to speak were longwinded, forcing Curley
to leave without speaking after 2½ hours so he could get to work on
time.
Too bad. Curley had plenty to say, at least outside the meeting room; he
spoke in calm, measured tones, not much louder than a whisper.

He sees discrimination in our court system based on

race and money, with some criminals receiving the death penalty and
others life in prison.

"You find out very quickly it's a great system, but it's not always
fair," Curley said. "If you have money and can afford to go to court
with a good defense lawyer, you have a better chance than some guy that
doesn't."

He learned these inequities the hard way, after the murder of his son.

Jeffrey loved baseball. He loved going to dad's office, the fire
station, and climbing on the trucks.

"He was a funny little kid who liked to have a good time," Curley said.
"He was a city kid growing up in East Cambridge. He was funny and
outgoing and liked mechanical things. He liked to hang out with the guys
at the firehouse. He was kind of a showoff, a good kid."

On Oct. 1, 1997, Jeffrey was lured away from his neighborhood by Sicari
and Jaynes, who promised him a new bike.

They smothered Jeffrey with a gasoline-soaked rag, sexually abused him,
then stuffed his body into a concrete-filled container and dumped him in
a Maine river.

News stations began showing a picture of Jeffrey in his blue Little
League uniform, a bat resting on his right shoulder. Divers found him
six days later.

"Prior to that I think I was like most people, never gave the death
penalty much thought," Curley said. "One way or the other, whatever way
the wind blows. Yeah, there should be the death penalty when you hear
something horrible happened, and the other way around when you hear
someone was wrongly convicted."

His opinion on the death penalty when Sicari and Jaynes were convicted?

"I wanted them dead," Curley said.

His opinion, though, began shifting two or three years after Jeffrey's
death. Curley read about Manny Babbitt, who had been wounded in Vietnam
and was considered a war hero. Babbitt, suffering from post-traumatic
stress disorder, killed a California woman in 1980 and was executed by
lethal injection in 1999.

And then there was Harvard graduate Ted Kaczynski, also known as the
Unabomber. His mail bombs between 1978 and '95 killed three and wounded
23. He's serving a life sentence without parole.

"The poor black man Manny Babbitt gets executed, and the white educated
guy from Harvard gets life," Curley said. "That was the defining moment
for me."

Curley also cited the men who killed his son. Jaynes gagged Jeffrey,
leading to his death, then sexually assaulted him; Sicari drove the car.
Yet Jaynes was convicted of second-degree murder, with parole possible,
and Sicari of first-degree murder.

Curley said he knows why.

Jaynes "hired a good defense lawyer," Curley said. "(Sicari), who was a
tagalong stooge, got life without the possibility of parole. That stood
out to me, how the system plays out."

Has money played a role in sentencing here, in New Hampshire? What about
race?

Michael Addison killed Manchester police Officer Michael Briggs in 2006
and was sentenced to death in late 2008. John Brooks was convicted on
two counts of capital murder in 2008 and is serving a life sentence
without the possibility of parole.

Addison is poor and black, Brooks a white millionaire whose legal team
was the best money could buy.

The murder Brooks committed was planned, but Addison killed a cop. Who
deserved what? You make the call.

Meanwhile, Curley's crusade for justice in our system is limited,
although he traveled to Geneva two weeks ago to speak at the World
Congress Against the Death Penalty. "They invited me," he said, "so I
went."

He throws himself into his work these days. He's got two sons,
31-year-old Robert, a pipe fitter, and 29-year-old Shaun, a carpenter.
He and his wife have divorced since the death of their son. Curley said
the killing had nothing to do with the split.

"I'm fine, relatively speaking," Curley said, adding a subtle laugh.
"It's crazy, but I really feel Jeff died for a reason, to highlight a
lot of different things as far as sexual abuse of kids and things that
are wrong in the world. I try to live in a dignified way and carry
Jeffrey's memory."

Curley then paused for at least five seconds, choking back tears and
collecting his thoughts on yesterday's hearing.

"This," he said finally, "is bigger than me."
 
May 20, 2004
602
34
0
www.rapbay.com
#7
STANDING BY YOUR MORALS MAKES YOU A GREAT MAN
Rightly so... But I'd also go as far as to say STANDING BY YOUR MORALS MAKES YOU A COWARD

in the end its your personal belief and interpretation.

But what are these morals and where do they come from? You were taught them at some point.. you picked them up along the way. They're generally (blindly) accepted ideas of right and wrong... but right and wrong in the eyes of who? You? Clearly not... you've just been conditioned to think these morals are real. They only have as much power as you give them... and the fact that someone might question what they feel because they compare it to a conceptual structure of belief called morals is a shame.

The culture and society just accepts these things. They have a purpose which is to make sure people are considerate and compassionate towards each other and thats a great thing. But the morals are nothing concrete that exist beyond popular belief. They're supportive of the attachment to the "positive" or "good feeling" aspects of the human experience. And the suppression of what is considered "negative" or the bad aspects of our experiences. Which is a ridiculous and impossible game to play. Neither side can exist without the other and your attachment to the "good" is what makes you suffer. Because you go to great lengths to attain and bring continuity to that "good"... and when the "bad" drops as it always will.. you don't want it and push it away.. and suffer. Not realizing that they both go together in balance. And even the translation of "good" and "bad" are mere interpretations themselves. "Morals" open the flood gates for alot of judging to go on... which is again your actions being compared to this structure of belief that simply has no inherent separate existence in and of itself.

If someone killed and sexually assaulted my child. I would go to great lengths to hunt them down, make them suffer, and kill them. And I'd feel wonderful about it. Because the action stands ultimately as what it means to you... prior to translation. Prior to comparison to "morals". Revenge wouldn't make things right in any way. But if someone harmed my child in that way they can be wiped off the face of the earth... brutally. It's not important that they live anymore than it's important for any of us to live. Its just not. So the game will be played. The world will still spin. And the universe will go on.

"Moral" of the story is... do what you dig... and if you gotta jump off into some vengeful ghastly shit... don't get caught. Cos the moralists will come for your ass! Persecuting and judging in the name of whatever bullshit props up their bullshit.