DEMOCRATS PUSH FOR MORE MONEY FOR THOSE WHO DONT WORK

[proppa]

democrats push for 1 billion dollars to go to people that are unimployed. they say that around 300,000 or the 6 million are un employed because of big bussness taking there company's to other countries.

my question to you is. arnt democrats responsible for these 300 jobs being gone. and shouldnt they do more to support big bussenss and get these people jobs. intead of keeping them depending on the goverment for support.

instead of talking about ways to bring jobs here and keep jobs here, they say well here's some money vote for us in 2004

 

[Mcleanhatch]

and who is going to pay for it??? of course the ones that are working and are getting taxed, and taxed, and taxed.

this guys that are unemployed need to go get a JOB instead of waiting for a handout.

 

[proppa]

yep funny how nefar and the other comi's dont say shit now.

 

[nefar559]

are labeling me a democrat?

 

[2-0-Sixx]

LMAO! No shit...Since when was a "commie" a democrat?

This proves how much of an idiot proppa is. :dead:

 

[proppa]

no difference to me.

they both give money for no work and want everyone to depend on the goverment.

wheres the difference?

 

[nefar559]

both parties are supported by corporations equaly, and democrats have very little labour support compared to their corporate support. and since when do corporations have the interest of the labourer?

and another thing, cutting programs for the poor, increases proverty.

 

[nefar559]

since you alway bitch about taxes, why dont you start with the program that gets the most money?

doesn't compare with any of the social programs, which are really nothing compared to it.

 

[Mcleanhatch]

since you alway bitch about taxes, why dont you start with the program that gets the most money?

doesn't compare with any of the social programs, which are really nothing compared to it.

and which would that be???