thascary1 Sicc OG Mar 14, 2007 #21 Mar 16, 2005 6,904 403 83 Mar 14, 2007 #21 thascary1 Mar 14, 2007 ArGenTin3 said: I'm pretty sure my boys Edwards, DJ and Harris wont have any troubles containin your tightends. Thats what they do best! Click to expand... which leaves the lb's off the line for the running of THenry...that's what I mean by this being an AWESOME sigining. Sure you can cover them, but then it takes away from run defense, or you can stop the run and leave graham and scheffler free.
ArGenTin3 said: I'm pretty sure my boys Edwards, DJ and Harris wont have any troubles containin your tightends. Thats what they do best! Click to expand... which leaves the lb's off the line for the running of THenry...that's what I mean by this being an AWESOME sigining. Sure you can cover them, but then it takes away from run defense, or you can stop the run and leave graham and scheffler free.
ArGenTin3 Sicc OG Mar 14, 2007 #22 Mar 24, 2006 4,804 476 0 46 Mar 14, 2007 #22 ArGenTin3 Mar 14, 2007 thascary1 said: which leaves the lb's off the line for the running of THenry...that's what I mean by this being an AWESOME sigining. Sure you can cover them, but then it takes away from run defense, or you can stop the run and leave graham and scheffler free. Click to expand... if covering is what our LB's do best (1A), tackling is definately (1B)! now only if we can get some got damn wideouts that are actually worth somethin (except Kennison) i'd be happy!
thascary1 said: which leaves the lb's off the line for the running of THenry...that's what I mean by this being an AWESOME sigining. Sure you can cover them, but then it takes away from run defense, or you can stop the run and leave graham and scheffler free. Click to expand... if covering is what our LB's do best (1A), tackling is definately (1B)! now only if we can get some got damn wideouts that are actually worth somethin (except Kennison) i'd be happy!
