Conspiracies and you
- Thread starter Sav Scorcese
- Start date
i had everything planned but then suddenly life went downhill with the death of my lasting living family member which was then to be followed by my best freind that i previously took a trip to colorado with. both in the same week...after that i really didnt feel up to anything but i plan to go this summer hopefully.
Reasons For Faking
Many people believe that NASA had realized that it was not possible to go to the moon with the technology available (Computer chips being as powerful then as a modern washing machines chip) so they resorted to faking the landing to ensure a victory of the Soviet Union and keep the dollars coming in for real space projects.
How Odds Changed To Favor The US
Up until 1963 the odds for someone to go to the moon and returning was 0.0017% so it is incredible that by 1969 the odds were 100%.
Sounds From The Moon
The major point which has helped convince me that the moon landing was faked was the fact that when the control room asked a question to the Astronoughts the replies were instant with no delays. This seems strange as even with technology in the 1990's there is a delay from satellite links from the UK to the US. There is about a 0.7 second delay from London to California so how is it possible for instant replies from the Moon ?
There is also evidence that when people go into space there voice goes tense although the Astronaughts voices have been analyzed and found to be normal and 7/10 people said sounded like someone reading from a script.
When Houston are talking to the module you should not be able to hear the responses at least when the module is landing and the infamous "eagle has landed" quote, this is due to the noise that should have been created by the rocket motor which generates several hundred thousand pounds of thrust 20 ft below the astronaughts. The noise would have completely drowned the vocals out.
Here is another example of an astronaut that has his back to the sun, it would seem that the front of his body would appear as a pure black silhouette to us (as well as the lunar rover in the background). Where is the light coming from that illuminates the front of his body?
A light source placed close to the objects would not create converging shadows - it would create diverging shadows.
Multiple light sources create multiple shadows. There are none in the Apollo photo.
2: There is no wind on the moon....and flags dont wave on the moon either...
3:Why havnt we been back? ? ?
4:This is the most valid reason why i think its fake, Everyone in the world witnessed the first man step outside the spaceship and take the first step on the moon....
But who setup the camera to capture this amazing first man on the moon movie.....
Reasons For Faking
Many people believe that NASA had realized that it was not possible to go to the moon with the technology available (Computer chips being as powerful then as a modern washing machines chip) so they resorted to faking the landing to ensure a victory of the Soviet Union and keep the dollars coming in for real space projects.
How Odds Changed To Favor The US
Up until 1963 the odds for someone to go to the moon and returning was 0.0017% so it is incredible that by 1969 the odds were 100%.
Sounds From The Moon
The major point which has helped convince me that the moon landing was faked was the fact that when the control room asked a question to the Astronoughts the replies were instant with no delays. This seems strange as even with technology in the 1990's there is a delay from satellite links from the UK to the US. There is about a 0.7 second delay from London to California so how is it possible for instant replies from the Moon ?
There is also evidence that when people go into space there voice goes tense although the Astronaughts voices have been analyzed and found to be normal and 7/10 people said sounded like someone reading from a script.
When Houston are talking to the module you should not be able to hear the responses at least when the module is landing and the infamous "eagle has landed" quote, this is due to the noise that should have been created by the rocket motor which generates several hundred thousand pounds of thrust 20 ft below the astronaughts. The noise would have completely drowned the vocals out.
Here is another example of an astronaut that has his back to the sun, it would seem that the front of his body would appear as a pure black silhouette to us (as well as the lunar rover in the background). Where is the light coming from that illuminates the front of his body?
A light source placed close to the objects would not create converging shadows - it would create diverging shadows.
Multiple light sources create multiple shadows. There are none in the Apollo photo.
2: There is no wind on the moon....and flags dont wave on the moon either...
3:Why havnt we been back? ? ?
4:This is the most valid reason why i think its fake, Everyone in the world witnessed the first man step outside the spaceship and take the first step on the moon....
But who setup the camera to capture this amazing first man on the moon movie.....
5: there were only 2 ppl on the moon right? there are 3 visible in this picture...
6: Crosshair Knockout
FOX narrator: "For reference, crosshairs were permanently etched into the lunar cameras, so they would have to appear on top of every image. But in this photo, a crosshair is behind a part of the lunar rover." David Percy then opines: "This situation is impossible and has to be the result of technical manipulation and doctoring of the image." Clue: in each example FOX showed of an object appearing to be over a crosshair, the obtrusive object was sunlit and bright white, such as these examples:
7:Identical Backgrounds
FOX Narrator: "These two photos seem to have the same mountain backdrop, yet the lunar module is only visible in one of them. Seemingly impossible since the LEM never moved, and its based remained even after the mission. Some suggest the same artificial backdrop was used when shooting two entirely separate pictures."
aranoid:
thanks man i gained alotta good info off of this thread.
http://www.overgrow.com/edge/showthread.php?t=55752&onlyuser=&perpage=15&pagenumber=1
http://www.overgrow.com/edge/showthread.php?t=55752&onlyuser=&perpage=15&pagenumber=1
