CHARGERS AT OAKLAND!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
T

Tony

Sicc OG
#182
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
48
#182
3VID3NC3 said:
Haha my bad if thats the case but you seriously think we'll go 10-2 the rest of the season? I think we got potential to put together a little win streak if the team continues to improve but I dont see the team finishing over .500. Especially if Kiffin gets canned.
Click to expand...
Our defense can't stop anyone when it counts. Yesterday's game is clear proof!
 
T

Tony

Sicc OG
#184
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
48
#184
What question? Do I think we can go 10-2 the rest of the season? I don't think so because our defense can't stop anyone when it counts man. Al is making the wrong decisions. He should give Kiffin full control of head coaching responsibilities. If Kiffin wanted to bring in another defensive coordinator then he should have been allowed to. It's obvious what's costing games now. I was critical of Kiffin because of his conservative play calling but that wasn't the case in yesterday's game. Rob Ryan has to get his defense playing better or he should be replaced, immediately!

It probably was Rob Ryan who convinced Al to pay T. Kelly and D. Hall all that scratch so they should be winning games not losing them for us. D. Hall is playing too far off when he's in man coverage and the receivers keep turning him around. Since Kiffin has no say so, it's Rob's responsibility to fix this defene period.
 
drunkaholic707

drunkaholic707

FUCK LA
#185
Sep 20, 2005
26,088
59,031
113
FUCK YOU
#185
Tony said:
What question? Do I think we can go 10-2 the rest of the season? I don't think so because our defense can't stop anyone when it counts man. Al is making the wrong decisions. He should give Kiffin full control of head coaching responsibilities. If Kiffin wanted to bring in another defensive coordinator then he should have been allowed to. It's obvious what's costing games now. I was critical of Kiffin because of his conservative play calling but that wasn't the case in yesterday's game. Rob Ryan has to get his defense playing better or he should be replaced, immediately!

It probably was Rob Ryan who convinced Al to pay T. Kelly and D. Hall all that scratch so they should be winning games not losing them for us. D. Hall is playing too far off when he's in man coverage and the receivers keep turning him around. Since Kiffin has no say so, it's Rob's responsibility to fix this defene period.
Click to expand...

hold on so last week you wanted to fire kiffin but this week you want to give him full head coaching responsibilities ?
 
T

Tony

Sicc OG
#186
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
48
#186
Yep, because I see the problem now. I mean if he's going to be taking the heat for the Raiders losing then he should of at least be given full control. This is crazy.... there's no way Kiffin could be blamed for yesterday's loss. It was 0% his fault.
 
T-Rip

T-Rip

T Camp
#187
Jan 18, 2006
14,367
6,557
113
44
#187
Yall are being to critical on our defense, if it wasnt for them we wouldnt be in the game. I think it was Escobar that said they have good these past 3 seasons and i agree besides maybe last year, they struggled last season a bit. If they werent on the field so much they wouldnt be so tired in the 4th quarter
 
T

Tony

Sicc OG
#188
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
48
#188
Well if they would learn how to stop offenses then they wouldn't be on the field for so long. Man we had a 15-3 lead going into the 4th quarter and then all of a sudden the Chargers finish the game with 28 points. WTF? You have to be critical of the defense for allowing that many points to be scored in that little of time. I let them slide a bit last week in Buffalo but not this week.
 
nonfiCKtion

nonfiCKtion

Sicc OG
#190
Aug 9, 2002
5,835
161
0
#190
The Raiders pulled the same bullshit we used to do. Dominate the whole 1st half then let the other team comeback the 2nd. 25 pts in the 4th is a lot to give up. Yall got rings but at least we can say as of right now that we're 10-0 against the Raiders these past 5yrs. Soon to be 11-0.
 
FATAL NYGHTMARE

FATAL NYGHTMARE

Sicc OG
#193
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#193
Solitary 1 said:
ARE YOU SERIOUS? NINER FANS IN HERE THOUGHT THEY WERE GONNA BEAT THE SAINTS!!!!

WHO YOU CALLING DELUSIONAL?!?!?!??
Click to expand...
If you don't think we had a shot at this game you're trippin. We lost by two scores and JT O'Sullivan tossed INTs on two go-ahead scores. The Saints never let off. We lost because O'Sullivan doesn't know how to protect the ball and he makes bad decisions under pressure. You act like we just got blown out and couldn't even move the ball. Fuck that, if it weren't for those 2 INTs in the redzone the game would have looked completely different and the outcome could have been different as well. Look deeper than the 14 point difference homie. Take away two plays and the game looks dramatically different. If two plays can change the entire game, then it was closer than you think.
 
cro-mag

cro-mag

Sicc OG
#194
May 1, 2007
336
2
0
41
#194
FATAL NYGHTMARE said:
If you don't think we had a shot at this game you're trippin. We lost by two scores and JT O'Sullivan tossed INTs on two go-ahead scores. The Saints never let off. We lost because O'Sullivan doesn't know how to protect the ball and he makes bad decisions under pressure. You act like we just got blown out and couldn't even move the ball. Fuck that, if it weren't for those 2 INTs in the redzone the game would have looked completely different and the outcome could have been different as well. Look deeper than the 14 point difference homie. Take away two plays and the game looks dramatically different. If two plays can change the entire game, then it was closer than you think.
Click to expand...
Could of, would have, should have. If the Russell didn't fumble the ball inside the chargers 10 yard line or if the chargers wouldn't have got the int off mcfaddens tip the raiders may have won the game also. There is no excuses in football.
 
Arson

Arson

Long live the KING!!!!
#195
May 7, 2002
15,795
10,860
113
#195
cro-mag said:
Could of, would have, should have. If the Russell didn't fumble the ball inside the chargers 10 yard line or if the chargers wouldn't have got the int off mcfaddens tip the raiders may have won the game also. There is no excuses in football.
Click to expand...
But the fact is, the niners still have a better record then the Raiders, and solitary1 still smokes meth.
 
Meta4iCAL

Meta4iCAL

Raider Nation
#196
Feb 21, 2005
19,635
4,278
113
39
#196
FATAL NYGHTMARE said:
If you don't think we had a shot at this game you're trippin. We lost by two scores and JT O'Sullivan tossed INTs on two go-ahead scores. The Saints never let off. We lost because O'Sullivan doesn't know how to protect the ball and he makes bad decisions under pressure. You act like we just got blown out and couldn't even move the ball. Fuck that, if it weren't for those 2 INTs in the redzone the game would have looked completely different and the outcome could have been different as well. Look deeper than the 14 point difference homie. Take away two plays and the game looks dramatically different. If two plays can change the entire game, then it was closer than you think.
Click to expand...
maybe I'm wrong... but I'm pretty sure you didn't think we had a shot at beating the chargers... did you?

so what's your point?

the niners got smashed on straight up

yeah a lot of it had to do with j.t. osullivan fuckin up... but that's the same guy who the niners fans have been praising and bragging
about

niners lost... straight up... and the game was never close once the saints scored
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom