California Governor Election 2010

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

I'm voting for:

  • Jerry Brown

    Votes: 11 30.6%
  • Meg Whitman

    Votes: 5 13.9%
  • Other

    Votes: 5 13.9%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 3 8.3%
  • I dont/cant vote

    Votes: 12 33.3%

  • Total voters
    36
  • Poll closed .
Apr 25, 2002
5,314
2,065
113
43
#43
damn Shea - lot of hostility in that response big homie. Just stating my stance.

And yet, no one has answered my question why people can retire with 90% of their salary funded by mine, yours, and everybody elses in California's tax money. Where is the sense in that? Honestly, Id really like someone to intelligently defend that position. Forget me being a banker. Forget me being educated. How about lil ol lady who is the secretary for a private company. Why doesnt she get 90% of her salary when she retires? Is she evil too Shea?
 
Apr 25, 2002
5,314
2,065
113
43
#44
PS - While all of my homies who were busy doing/selling drugs, partying, and generally not giving a fuck about life here in Stockton, I was busy putting myself through college, and then took on debt to go get my Masters degree. I put in MORE work than the average person to get where I am. But your logic says those guys who didnt do 1/10th of the work I have done to get where I am deserve additonal breaks/benefits.

FUCK.......THAT!
 
Dec 4, 2006
17,451
7,543
113
48
#45
Like Shea said...Whitman will only hurt California in the long even more...

I been trying to tell my sister to vote for Brown, because the Whitman route is not the one we need right now.

She wants to build jobs where technology should be used more than manual labor, sorry...but that's not the way.

I wouldn't want a fucking remote controlled bobcat, excavator or backhoe doing my job or a robot doing some of the labor I do.....

And she's only looking out for the rich (she's a rich person) and wants to help her own ass....
 
Nov 24, 2003
6,307
3,639
113
#48
damn Shea - lot of hostility in that response big homie. Just stating my stance.

And yet, no one has answered my question why people can retire with 90% of their salary funded by mine, yours, and everybody elses in California's tax money. Where is the sense in that? Honestly, Id really like someone to intelligently defend that position. Forget me being a banker. Forget me being educated. How about lil ol lady who is the secretary for a private company. Why doesnt she get 90% of her salary when she retires? Is she evil too Shea?


Retirement in its current state and taking into consideration our available resources and ability to to convert and distribute them is completely unsustainable.

Why don't we all just pass a law mandating government funded retirement at age 25? Sounds airtight great to me lol!