http://www.guardian.co.uk/uslatest/story/0,,-6083135,00.html
Watch Video (realplayer)
^^^ Damn it, I hate realplayer
Watch Video (realplayer)
^^^ Damn it, I hate realplayer
Bush admits there were explosives in WTC?
- Thread starter Y-S
- Start date
"For example, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed described the design of plane attacks on building inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them out. That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility to protect the American people.
He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping. "
He was referring to the planes.
He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping. "
He was referring to the planes.
This Mohammed guy made it clear that it was in regard to "the design of plane attacks on building inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them out".
It sounds to me like these were general instructions given during the early stages of design. They had not decided specifically how the explosive entities were to be delivered - stationary satchel charges, rockets, PLANES - they only knew that the point of impact had to be high enough as to prevent the people above it from escaping.
It sounds to me like these were general instructions given during the early stages of design. They had not decided specifically how the explosive entities were to be delivered - stationary satchel charges, rockets, PLANES - they only knew that the point of impact had to be high enough as to prevent the people above it from escaping.
http://dc.indymedia.org/usermedia/audio/1/u2r2h--bush_explosives-15sep06.mp3
^^^^
listen too the short clip of the interview...
now a couple things...
1st..the run up sentence to his statement did not include anything involving planes..
2nd.. u mean to tell me that he 'accidently' mistook crashing/smashing/running into.. with 'set off'... ok.. but then it wasnt only the verb he mistook but also the noun.. plane/jet/747 with 'explosives'?????? now.. sit and think... when was the last time u let slip both the act of doing and the thing u were doing it with..
"i went to the store and bought a blunt"
"i went to the store and robbed the place
................................. snatched a 40
u get the point..
thirdly.. he even hesitated realizing that he slipped up.. wow..
"uhh even tho theres a large number believeing it was controlled demolitions the president really meant hijacked planes ....uh yeah"
mob shit/rightwingers........................................... everybody else
......:cheeky:....................................................................... :hurt:
......"oh ok"............................................................."yeah ok"
^^^^
listen too the short clip of the interview...
now a couple things...
1st..the run up sentence to his statement did not include anything involving planes..
2nd.. u mean to tell me that he 'accidently' mistook crashing/smashing/running into.. with 'set off'... ok.. but then it wasnt only the verb he mistook but also the noun.. plane/jet/747 with 'explosives'?????? now.. sit and think... when was the last time u let slip both the act of doing and the thing u were doing it with..
"i went to the store and bought a blunt"
"i went to the store and robbed the place
................................. snatched a 40
u get the point..
thirdly.. he even hesitated realizing that he slipped up.. wow..
"uhh even tho theres a large number believeing it was controlled demolitions the president really meant hijacked planes ....uh yeah"
mob shit/rightwingers........................................... everybody else
......:cheeky:....................................................................... :hurt:
......"oh ok"............................................................."yeah ok"
That's not even a question!
And by al-Qaida operative, Bush means 'anyone we feel like spying on'.
This coming from a man who started a war which has resulted in the deaths of 30,000 innocent Iraqi civilians, including women and children. All to achieve their objective - getting oil.
I just can't listen to a word this wanker says - Bush is the biggest knob-jockey in history and the fact that he was not only elected initially but also elected for a second term will scar Americas political reputation for decades to come.
And by al-Qaida operative, Bush means 'anyone we feel like spying on'.
This coming from a man who started a war which has resulted in the deaths of 30,000 innocent Iraqi civilians, including women and children. All to achieve their objective - getting oil.
I just can't listen to a word this wanker says - Bush is the biggest knob-jockey in history and the fact that he was not only elected initially but also elected for a second term will scar Americas political reputation for decades to come.
you are taking this shit completely out of context. mob shit had it right. it is very obvious and shouldnt take a genius to realize that he was talking about the general plan. He was talking about what one of terrorists had said. He was not talking specifically about the sep 11th attacks but about the general idea of the plan. i.e. they had not actually decided what form of "explosives" they would use yet. it could have been a bomb carried by a terrorist into the building, a missile shot from jet, a passenger jet flying into the plane etc. (all of which are ultimately "explosives")
come on, if you're gonna have a conspiracy theory, please understand the information you are gonna use to back it up!!!
so its totally IMPOSSIBLE... for someone who planned 9/11 to refer to one of its possiblities when they mention "setting off explosives high enough?" are you going to tell me that its just a coincidence??
i have already set up a thread for u non-believers to debunk all my theories..
http://www.siccness.net/vb/showthread.php?t=203982
i suggest u get crackin... and i suggest before proclaiming someone doesnt know what they're talking about u figure out what it is they're saying...
i have already set up a thread for u non-believers to debunk all my theories..
http://www.siccness.net/vb/showthread.php?t=203982
i suggest u get crackin... and i suggest before proclaiming someone doesnt know what they're talking about u figure out what it is they're saying...
some are not going to believe the conspiracy theory that a man in a cave can lead a group to hijack 4 planes while our defenses were asleep at the wheel.. so if its taking blame off the people who "really did it" then u must be referring to iraqi's correct? can u tell me what they had to do with 9/11?
I know, not sure why the supreme court decided to award him with the presidency to start with, but there were enough votes in his favour to force them to make that decision. If the American public really didn't want him in office, then he would have had fuck all chance of getting a second term. I know though, uneducated war-loving southerners were the ones who voted for him and fucked it up for the rest of you.