Biased Leftist Media Spreads Erroneous Lies on President Bush

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jul 13, 2005
171
0
0
#1
Poll: Many Doubt White House Cooperation in CIA Leak Probe
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/PollVault/story?id=949950
I'm not posting all of it because it is, well, just not that fascinating an article. But, it demonstrates the liberal bias of the press that the left wishes to pretend does not exist.

According to this poll, 25% of the country thinks the White House is cooperating fully with this investigation.

Fact of the matter is --- the WH IS fully cooperating. Anybody Fitzgerald wished to speak to under oath has testified under oath. Some have done so repeatedly. There has never been a problem getting info from Bush's people on this case.

On the other hand, the press has stonewalled from day one. Miller is in jail for this. Cooper nearly went to jail for this. The NY Times knows far more about this story than Rove does and is not only stonewalling --- they're criticizing the guy who has testified under oath about 3 times of not being open enough.

When you can report a story EXTENSIVELY for several weeks and have the people believing the exact opposite of the truth --- you've blatantly spun the story to your own desires.

The press wants to get Bush. They have for years. And they will use this as their main salvo against him. And they will invent lies, skew reporting, and utterly shirk their responsibilities in pursuit of this.

So, anytime a lib tries to claim that there really isn't a liberal bias --- ask them to explain how a widely and extensively reported story can have 75% of the country believe something that is, indisputably, not true?
 
Jun 27, 2003
2,457
10
0
37
#3
Please provide factual information that the media is so overtly liberal. Also, please provide some kind of FACTUAL information that the white house is fully cooperating, even tho we all know they aren't. You're conservative bullshit propaganda doesn't count, so until you provide this: SHUT THE FUCK UP.
 
Jul 13, 2005
171
0
0
#4
Jae iLL said:
Please provide factual information that the media is so overtly liberal.
I did, in the post to which you just replied. It's liberal bias because it is blatantly anti-Republican and is the worst type of partisan witch hunt. Why don't you quote the parts you didn't understand, and discuss like a normal human being. As opposed to just saying stupid, stupid things.

Also, please provide some kind of FACTUAL information that the white house is fully cooperating,
Everybody Fitzgerald has asked to testify has testified. Some repeatedly. Meanwhile, Miller won't talk. Cooper wasn't going to. The NY Times executives have Miller's notes and they won't talk.

even tho we all know they aren't
Sane, rational people can see the whitehouse is cooperating. There has been no accusation, even by the NY Times, otherwise. The only people who claim there is something crooked going on are the batshit insane morons who believe Preisdent Bush hired space aliens to demolish the WTC.
 
Jun 27, 2003
2,457
10
0
37
#7
Tha_Perv said:
CBS is liberal.
Most outspoken celebrities are liberal.

This makes most the media also liberal. Thank God for FOX news who keeps it real.
yeaa, great Conservative ideals are seen in the SURVIVOR shows huh?
 
Jun 27, 2003
2,457
10
0
37
#10
Again, you have failed to prove some sort of "liberal bias" in the media.

Don't you remember when Scott McClellan spoke very openly about the situation, and now all of a sudden Rove has been caught red handed he decides to shut up? Did baby bush discuss the conversation Rove had with Novak? Why isn't baby bush living up to his words that he'd fire "anybody that leaks the name of a CIA operative"? Althought people have testified, how do you know they are COOPERATING.

Again, until you post some sort of proof to back your claims up, I suggest you follow your own advice and shut the fuck up.
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#11
Joe DiMaggio said:
Unfunny non-sequiturs belong in the open forum.

but there was no opposition to the war, how can you say the media is liberal and yet this MAJOR event wasnt debated? that there is major proof against you argument.
 
Jul 25, 2005
72
0
0
#12
Well out where I live there are 2 major newspapers. One is way anti-Bush and the other tells the truth. So there is a liberal bias in the media depending where you get your news from. And the majority is leftist garbage.
 
Aug 20, 2004
5,174
5
0
#14
Tha_Perv said:
Well out where I live there are 2 major newspapers. One is way anti-Bush and the other tells the truth. So there is a liberal bias in the media depending where you get your news from. And the majority is leftist garbage.
Kentucky backwoods have news papers???WOw...advacning quite well in the woods there arent ya pal...have you fucked your cousin yet today???
 
Apr 6, 2004
674
2
0
#17
The media liberal, only in European terms. Somebody is on Bush's DICK!!!!
The media is only not on Bush's side when it suites them to protect their CONSERVATIVELY held rights. Come on dumb ass. Fuck da media, u want lesftist try Narco News, Granma Inter. Al Jazeerea, they are kicking azz wit da real truths
 
Aug 8, 2003
5,360
22
0
41
#18
Jae iLL said:
Again, you have failed to prove some sort of "liberal bias" in the media.

Don't you remember when Scott McClellan spoke very openly about the situation, and now all of a sudden Rove has been caught red handed he decides to shut up? Did baby bush discuss the conversation Rove had with Novak? Why isn't baby bush living up to his words that he'd fire "anybody that leaks the name of a CIA operative"? Althought people have testified, how do you know they are COOPERATING.
U beat me too it jae.

Bush put his foot in his mouth by saying he would fire anyone who would leak that info... and then when it comes out into the light that it was rove..

"uhh...err... im going to pick a supreme justice judge..."

they will point at the media and claim biased when there has yet to be anything erronous about what they report...Ill quote these from the link u posted...

This view is highly partisan; barely over a tenth of Democrats and just a quarter of independents think the White House is fully cooperating. That grows to 47 percent of Republicans — much higher, but still under half in the president's own party.
ohh wait but it gets better...

This ABC News poll was conducted by telephone July 13-17, 2005, among a random national sample of 1,008 adults. The results have a three-point error margin. Sampling, data collection and tabulation by ICR-International Communications Research of Media, Pa.
seems u just helped prove that this wasnt a biased poll or article and the fact is only a small margine of actually belief that dipshit bush... but hey.. i envy your conviction of the sinking ship.. u kno even the nazi's thought they were doing the right thing at the time they were doing it...