Avatars: Yes or No?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Should we enable avatars?

  • Yes

    Votes: 41 78.8%
  • No

    Votes: 11 21.2%

  • Total voters
    52
  • Poll closed .
Sep 1, 2003
3,111
1
0
43
#47
lol how come the thread aint vital anymore ???


an where the hell is feben...he put this shit up an never even checkd back or nothin
 
Apr 25, 2002
688
5
0
41
www.geocities.com
#48
he told me since I said so they wont be on this site.... sorry for getting your hopes up but we'll also get rid of custom titles too and if anyone asks to get one they will get stuck in that pink board that you thought was gone, it is but they wont know that.
 
May 21, 2002
3,955
128
0
51
Sacramento, CA
#50
*bump*
odogfelon said:
yes but have a size limit like 100x100 pixels.
That's mando' right there.
nefar559 said:
...another things taht would be nice would be to add HTML tags on posts....for flash, real, wmp content.
Yes, I could turn the porn forum out if we had html turned on. But that may cause bandwidth issues.
NICOYA415 said:
I think you should permit avatars, but cut down on sigs. Make a rule where every sig has to be under 30kb or something.
Jezus on a stick! RACK that!!! Some of these sigs are re-fucking-diculous. I'm on a T1 here at work and this site STILL lags sometimes because of the big-ass sigs. I mean c'mon, do you REALLY have to attach the lyrics to a million songs to each post you make? Are attaching pics bigger than bustop adds a must? Fuckin A, regulate them shits to extend no longer than an inch below your actual post.

Oh yeah, I voted yes to the avatars. Hook it up.