Are Whites responsible for slave mentality and inter-race racism ?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Feb 7, 2006
6,794
229
0
39
#61
B-San said:
After slavery, it was sharecropping... segregation... and - Red Line Districting

Red line districting took place at the end of WWII... In addition to the WASPs (White Anglo Saxon Protestants), the banks gave mortgages to the Irish and Italian GI's so they could move from the inner-cities to the burbs (basically they got let in to the white club)... that is when the vacuum in the inner cities was filled by blacks... once the banks were running low on WASP and Catholic clientele, they began allowing a few black GI's to receive mortgages..

Redline districting basically stated that having blacks in the neighborhood would lower the property values of surrounding houses... white flight ensued... the banks designed a system to keep blac folks in debt/poor by refusing to approve businesses loans...

Lack of business = poverty = increase of crime... as crime went up, the black families that wanted to move out were given bottom dollar for their houses, which in turn were sold to the next black family for as high as possible...

keep everybody in debt and top that off with a dash of dope for added drama...
that is how the hood (CA's top three for example: Compton, Oakland, Richmond) was created...
you broke it down in the way I didn't. Props.
 
Aug 6, 2006
2,010
0
0
40
#63
WHITE DEVIL said:
I missed the mark with calling it "self-segregation" then.

What I am referring to is an unwillingness to deal within the business structure in a manner that is mutually beneficiary and upwardly mobile. I see too much of the "union mentality" often among Black employees...that the benefits and entitlements should come before the work ethic, and I've seen it in multiple fields. And this may very well be a survival mechanism based on dealing within the white structure, but it needs to change.
My distant relative, you're describing the very slave mentality in which the thread is based.
 
Oct 6, 2005
1,497
4
0
45
#65
B-San said:
After slavery, it was sharecropping... segregation... and - Red Line Districting

Red line districting took place at the end of WWII... In addition to the WASPs (White Anglo Saxon Protestants), the banks gave mortgages to the Irish and Italian GI's so they could move from the inner-cities to the burbs (basically they got let in to the white club)... that is when the vacuum in the inner cities was filled by blacks... once the banks were running low on WASP and Catholic clientele, they began allowing a few black GI's to receive mortgages..

Redline districting basically stated that having blacks in the neighborhood would lower the property values of surrounding houses... white flight ensued... the banks designed a system to keep blac folks in debt/poor by refusing to approve businesses loans...

Lack of business = poverty = increase of crime... as crime went up, the black families that wanted to move out were given bottom dollar for their houses, which in turn were sold to the next black family for as high as possible...

keep everybody in debt and top that off with a dash of dope for added drama...
that is how the hood (CA's top three for example: Compton, Oakland, Richmond) was created...
You're on point...! Black folks lose money on their homes simply because they move into 'em.. Shit is crazy...
 
Oct 14, 2004
2,782
0
0
46
#66
Both whites and Blacks are responsible. Remember Africans sold their own people to whites. So Africans are just as guilty as Europeans.
 
Mar 15, 2005
1,783
1
0
45
#67
i aint read every single post but i jus had to comment on Armen:

Armen you know i know where you live and dwell.....i lived in the area for a good few months and i know the demographics......there really isnt a blacc community in your area and if there is its not a very big one and they dont deal wit the same problems that the blacc community in actual cities deals wit.....i have yet to see a blacc filled "ghetto" in turlocc.....theres a lot of gang bangin cholos but thas a different issue.....

i live in a predominately black nieghborhood in Stoccton and have always lived in areas like this (the "ghetto","the hood". etc....) im hispanic but at 1st glance can be mistaken for white.....but at least 80% of my friends, associates and enemys are blacc......im also a lot older than armen and age and location have givin me a way better insight to this subject than that of a middle eastern kid living in a small farming town in the middle of the san joaquin valley whos majority of friends are either white or hispanic......

i see the "blacc on blacc" crime everyday and i agree wit the person who wrote those words Sav posted ( or did u write that yourself SAV????)

theres a reason why most of my closest blacc homies prefer my company over thier own race.....a lot of blacc people discuss topics and things with me they wouldnt with other blacc people for a few reasons one of them being that they know they will be judged a cetain way by blacc people for thier thoughts.....a lot of them rather trust me then thier blacc homies cuz all thier blacc homies are "shady"......most of the time they arent lyin....that person is shady.....

but it works both ways....that shady cat is commiting self racism by actin and doin shady things to his own race.....and now another blacc person is commiting self racism by believing that most of his own race will be shady to him and prefering to trust a non blacc person over his own race based on that belief.....

i see blacc people judge each other all day.....i hear "thas that white boy shit" all day whenever a blacc person does or says somethin thas not "blacc" enough.....take dope for example.....all my life ive heard so many blacc folks say that meth is that "white boy" drug and to stay away from it.....but i have personally smoked crystal meth with many of the same blacc folks that say this shit to their homies....and ive smoked it wit thier homies......and they all hide it from each other for fear of being judged and outcast from thier "blaccness"......

this shit really is a disease and one of the major reasons why ghettos and hoods will always be what they are until blacc people learn to love themselves way more than they do now.......
 
Mar 15, 2005
1,783
1
0
45
#68
oh and theres an INN around the corner that has them kitchenette type rooms where you can pay weekly or monthly for a romm.....a lot of poor blacc people stay there for months maybe even years and it was owned by a family from Africa for a couple years and its true....Africans treat Blacc Americans like they are shit and beneath them....they didnt trust anyone blacc that came to stay there....they accepted their money of course but would be on their ass about hangin out or having guests and if they didnt pay thier bill on time they made sure they called the police and had em evicted immediately....but i noticed there are white people and some mexicans who have managed to get away wit all that shit under these Africans management....some of them havent paid a dime in months and still are in thier room doin drugs and having illegal activities goin on.....
 
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
45
#69
Dhadnot said:
blacks dont segregate tghemselves, in fact blacks are the only racial group who wants to live in 50-50 neighborhoods, while whites on the other hand have a trend of moving out of the neighborhood once it turns 25% black. So i guess it's okay to constanly segregate blacks, but then when some get tired and just accept what they are giving it's them that's segregating. Shit don't work like that homes. Blacks can't be the only ones constantly trying to fit in, assimilate to the others culture...reciprocity is needed for anything race based to work in this society.
"Blacks don't segregate themselves..."

This might only be true because blacks don't have a choice. Many variables come into play here. At current, blacks DO segregate themselves, often times out of necessity. A low income black family is going to move into a low income neighborhood, comprised primarily of blacks (minoritires, really). However, given the opportunity, would an upper class black family not prefer to move into a mostly black neighborhood over a mostly white neighborhood, supposing both areas were equaly scaled? Blacks don't segregate themselves; this may be true from an objective standpoint, because of limited opportunity, but from a psychological point of view, I do not agree with this and I do not believe you are in any position to make such a statement. Blacks "want" to live 50-50 with whites? Lol, the only way I see this happening is if blacks were to move from poor neighboorhoods into some middle/upper-class white neighborhoods. I do not see blacks willingly making a lateral move into a white neighborhood, I'm sorry.
 
Aug 6, 2006
2,010
0
0
40
#72
Ethereal said:
"Blacks don't segregate themselves..."

This might only be true because blacks don't have a choice. Many variables come into play here. At current, blacks DO segregate themselves, often times out of necessity. A low income black family is going to move into a low income neighborhood, comprised primarily of blacks (minoritires, really). However, given the opportunity, would an upper class black family not prefer to move into a mostly black neighborhood over a mostly white neighborhood, supposing both areas were equaly scaled? Blacks don't segregate themselves; this may be true from an objective standpoint, because of limited opportunity, but from a psychological point of view, I do not agree with this and I do not believe you are in any position to make such a statement. Blacks "want" to live 50-50 with whites? Lol, the only way I see this happening is if blacks were to move from poor neighboorhoods into some middle/upper-class white neighborhoods. I do not see blacks willingly making a lateral move into a white neighborhood, I'm sorry.

This is so backwards to me..
 
Aug 6, 2006
2,010
0
0
40
#74
^You only bore yourself with your own absurd notions that is neither accurate, nor thought provoking, and simply not worth responding to. That's why you got those little droplets of a comment from people.. You have a lot to learn about black people, and if you don't know or don't want to know about them, you shouldn't of responded to the thread.
 
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
45
#78
ParkBoyz said:
if you don't know or don't want to know about them, you shouldn't of responded to the thread.
So If I DON'T want to know about black people, I should have STAYED AWAY from this thread? Think about what you're saying. It is "apparent" I don't care about blacks? Now who is being absurd.

I can tell you you this much, your response is typical. Chances are you misinterpreted something I said and would rather sit on it then make any attempt to understand my position. This is a poor way of thinking; I expect this much from the two who posted before you. I will continue to post in threads related to this one, just as I have in the past.

That is all.
 
Feb 7, 2006
6,794
229
0
39
#79
Ethereal said:
"Blacks don't segregate themselves..."

This might only be true because blacks don't have a choice. Many variables come into play here. At current, blacks DO segregate themselves, often times out of necessity. A low income black family is going to move into a low income neighborhood, comprised primarily of blacks (minoritires, really). However, given the opportunity, would an upper class black family not prefer to move into a mostly black neighborhood over a mostly white neighborhood, supposing both areas were equaly scaled? Blacks don't segregate themselves; this may be true from an objective standpoint, because of limited opportunity, but from a psychological point of view, I do not agree with this and I do not believe you are in any position to make such a statement. Blacks "want" to live 50-50 with whites? Lol, the only way I see this happening is if blacks were to move from poor neighboorhoods into some middle/upper-class white neighborhoods. I do not see blacks willingly making a lateral move into a white neighborhood, I'm sorry.

Who gives a fuck what YOU think, I'm going off of studies and posted up the social scientists names if you wanna check the research, so sorry.