Alex Smith.....

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Defy

Defy

Cannabis Connoisseur
#22
Jan 23, 2006
24,139
16,658
0
46
Rich City
#22
I like how people can't be busts because they've switched coaches and coordinators, unless they're on the Raiders
 
coondogg26

coondogg26

Sicc OG
#23
Nov 27, 2006
5,646
21
0
37
#23
Meta4iCAL said:
well you didn't say "the best writer of all time" BUT... the title of your thread was... "The best sports columnist is..."

soooo... yeah...
Click to expand...
soooo...saying someone is currently the best sportswriter is the same as saying he's not only the best sportswriter of all time but the best writer of all time? thats good deduction right there
 
Meta4iCAL

Meta4iCAL

Raider Nation
#25
Feb 21, 2005
19,635
4,278
113
39
#25
coondogg26 said:
soooo...saying someone is currently the best sportswriter is the same as saying he's not only the best sportswriter of all time but the best writer of all time? thats good deduction right there
Click to expand...
I didn't say they're the same thing, fool

I was implying that you're still jocking the guy hella hard... and it seems that you're jocking him because of all the good things he has to say about Favre

if dude had written an article praising Peyton Manning you would not have made that thread... and you would not say he's the best sports columnist
 
Espiohti

Espiohti

Sicc OG
#26
Mar 10, 2007
2,603
57
0
38
#26
Meta4iCAL said:
I didn't say they're the same thing, fool

I was implying that you're still jocking the guy hella hard... and it seems that you're jocking him because of all the good things he has to say about Favre

if dude had written an article praising Peyton Manning you would not have made that thread... and you would not say he's the best sports columnist
Click to expand...
exactly, I know you didn't sa he was the best writer of all time, but I was joking and being sarcastic about it and you completely missed it.
 
coondogg26

coondogg26

Sicc OG
#27
Nov 27, 2006
5,646
21
0
37
#27
Espiohti said:
exactly, I know you didn't sa he was the best writer of all time, but I was joking and being sarcastic about it and you completely missed it.
Click to expand...
again, sarcasm is detected by the inflection in someones voice and HOW they say something not what they say, this the internet fool. i apologize for reading what you said and taking it seriously, it wont happen again
 
Chree

Chree

Medicated
#32
Dec 7, 2005
32,404
13,935
113
40
#32
How about Jamarcus on his 3rd year with 9 ints and 2 tds so far? lmaooooooooooooooo

or 17 tds 21 ints and 14 lost fumbles in 3 years.... yeah....
 
Chree

Chree

Medicated
#33
Dec 7, 2005
32,404
13,935
113
40
#33
Alex Smith is only 25 years old. he has shown to be a decent player when healthy, in 2007 prior to getting hurt he threw for 461 yards in the 3 games, with 1 int (it was controversial, the pick by polamalu where vd got hurt)

Really, its quite funny that yall raider fans stay on Alex Smith, when his problems were due to an injury, yall have the real bust in Jamarcus Bustell, worry about him, Alex Smith still has a high chance of being a bust, but its a lot lower than JR
 
radiostationrep

radiostationrep

Sicc OG
#34
Dec 2, 2006
6,161
44
0
#34
The Pussu Pilot said:
Alex Smith is only 25 years old. he has shown to be a decent player when healthy, in 2007 prior to getting hurt he threw for 461 yards in the 3 games, with 1 int (it was controversial, the pick by polamalu where vd got hurt)

Really, its quite funny that yall raider fans stay on Alex Smith, when his problems were due to an injury, yall have the real bust in Jamarcus Bustell, worry about him, Alex Smith still has a high chance of being a bust, but its a lot lower than JR
Click to expand...
lol...

tell yourself whatever you like.
 
Meta4iCAL

Meta4iCAL

Raider Nation
#35
Feb 21, 2005
19,635
4,278
113
39
#35
The Pussu Pilot said:
Alex Smith is only 25 years old. he has shown to be a decent player when healthy, in 2007 prior to getting hurt he threw for 461 yards in the 3 games, with 1 int (it was controversial, the pick by polamalu where vd got hurt)

Really, its quite funny that yall raider fans stay on Alex Smith, when his problems were due to an injury, yall have the real bust in Jamarcus Bustell, worry about him, Alex Smith still has a high chance of being a bust, but its a lot lower than JR
Click to expand...
461 yards in 3 games is nothing special.... that's 153 yards a game... nothing really worth pointing out

decent I guess...but it doesn't prove anything... 1 int in 3 games is solid though I guess

and before you respond talking shit about Russell... just don't... there's no point
 
Chree

Chree

Medicated
#36
Dec 7, 2005
32,404
13,935
113
40
#36
Meta4iCAL said:
461 yards in 3 games is nothing special.... that's 153 yards a game... nothing really worth pointing out

decent I guess...but it doesn't prove anything... 1 int in 3 games is solid though I guess

and before you respond talking shit about Russell... just don't... there's no point
Click to expand...
it is with the WRs we had, and the OL we had and the OC too lol, Hostler was the biggest piece of shit ever
 
Defy

Defy

Cannabis Connoisseur
#37
Jan 23, 2006
24,139
16,658
0
46
Rich City
#37
The Pussu Pilot said:
Really, its quite funny that yall raider fans stay on Alex Smith, when his problems were due to an injury, yall have the real bust in Jamarcus Bustell, worry about him, Alex Smith still has a high chance of being a bust, but its a lot lower than JR
Click to expand...
Really? what I think is funny is that hella 9er fans feel the need to talk shit to Raider fans just to make them feel more warm & fuzzy inside. all this "at least we're not the Raiders" shit is hella old and y'all are just sounding like prissy princesses. no wonder y'all eat wine & cheese at your games on some real bitch shit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom