About the War on Terror. War tactics question.

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Nov 29, 2006
345
0
0
40
#1
I was woundering, I know most of us Americans are christians and if we kill ourselfs then it leads us to hell in the afterlife. But I was thinkin bout..well to be honest I think a good percent of americans are terrified of a suicide bombing happening and all this.

Well what if we started doing suicide bombings to them? ( i know this would never happen) but do you think it would fucc them up mentaliy like it does us. Say we fly Air Middle East (who knows?) and its full of middle easterns (innocent ones at that) and theres only a like 3-4 americans on that plane, and a american gets up in mid flight and blows it up like in the past.

then just roam in the neighbor hoods and BOOOM, suicide shit. americans in the market...whistling tunes then...BOOOOM! suicide!!..then they would hate having us there even more and they would flip out even more, like us with these mental games..

another forum...i guy suggested, we drop a fleet of pigs over the enemey and blow them the fucc up on them (muslims cant ever touch pork, they beleave they will not go to allah if this happens) so he sayin just blow up pigs all over them..eh who knows..

shit anything would be a good idea in order to stop this war
 
Dec 8, 2005
669
0
36
#2
american public cant even stomach war let alone occasional collateral damage in the middle east, which is why i am glad we do not dictate WAR policy.

to your point, what makes you so certain we have not employed and aided suicide bombings to instigate more bloodshed between the sunni and shia? divide and conquer, we have some "evil" white men in power in this country, and i dont think anyone would disagree with that, so i do not put it past them and in fact feel it is likely. did you catch the article abou the coalition troops dressing up as muslims and shooting civilians?

but as an open and declared tactic, i doubt we will use suicide bombing, although human life is much cheaper than advanced weaponry. simply we have more to lose.
 
Jun 27, 2005
5,207
0
0
#4
GTDProductions said:
another forum...i guy suggested, we drop a fleet of pigs over the enemey and blow them the fucc up on them (muslims cant ever touch pork, they beleave they will not go to allah if this happens) so he sayin just blow up pigs all over them..eh who knows..

shit anything would be a good idea in order to stop this war
So you think desecration of their soul according to their religion is going to stop the war? Sounds more like fuel on the fire to me.
 

Hemp

Sicc OG
Sep 5, 2005
1,248
2
0
#5
GTDProductions said:
another forum...i guy suggested, we drop a fleet of pigs over the enemey and blow them the fucc up on them (muslims cant ever touch pork, they beleave they will not go to allah if this happens) so he sayin just blow up pigs all over them..eh who knows..
what kind of ignorant ass shit is this?
muslims DONT touch pork cuz pork and a wet dog are unhallal, meaning if they do eat pork then they have to simply cleanse themselves.
this wont stop them from going to heaven.
and second, muslims never will go to "allah" because if you knew anything about islam youd know that they believe Allah exists without a place because a place is a sign of need and need is a sign of weakness and a God cannot be weak.
they believe in heaven there will be muslims, nobody ever believed that
1.God was in heaven
2. they will meet him
 
Apr 8, 2005
6,128
13
0
36
#7
XxtraMannish said:
So you think desecration of their soul according to their religion is going to stop the war? Sounds more like fuel on the fire to me.
it would be fucking hilarious though, if they got out of control we could have ashton kutcher go say "youve just been punked" those werent real pigs, then they'd all laugh with him and war would go back to how it is
 
Jun 27, 2005
5,207
0
0
#8
thatguy said:
it would be fucking hilarious though, if they got out of control we could have ashton kutcher go say "youve just been punked" those werent real pigs, then they'd all laugh with him and war would go back to how it is
Right. This just reminded me of how hilarious it was a few years back when all those churches were being burned down. If only Ashton Kutcher would have popped outfrombehind a bus bench and said "JUST KIDDING!"
 
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#9
I’m going to approach this question seriously, though I’ll probably regret it.

What makes you think the tactics currently employed by the U.S. and its allies do not include terrorism?

  • There have been a number of sociological & psychological studies conducted on the victims of war and civilian populations and the effects of mass bombings upon them. After WWII the U.S. sent people over to Japan to study the effectiveness of its bombings on the civilians there. The expressed immense terror over the fire bombings that the U.S. did to every major Japanese city. They said the unease and terror created by the thoughts of when and if the bombings would come each night were greater than coping with the actual results of the bombings. You can search for those on your own I don’t have time to type them up.

  • Check out the movie Fog of War. McNamara was working for Army math in WWII calculating the bombings on the Japanese people. He touches on this quite well and explains how numerous they really were.

  • In the occupied territories and especially over Gaza the Israeli air force frequently fly high speed at low altitude to terrify the Palestinian civilians. They intentionally create sonic booms to scare people and do damage (windows blow out all over the place quite often because of this tactic). It has a great psychological effect on people there.


Those are just a few brief examples.

Suicide bombings are a tool of the desperate and out gunned. The U.S and her allies don’t need to suicide bomb because we have real bombs, that do more damage, can create just as much fear, and are easier and cheaper to use. There is no reason for it.