A new 9/11 film....very interesting...

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

I AM

Some Random Asshole
Apr 25, 2002
21,001
86
48
#2
You weren't playin about the film...I thought it was gonna be a short video....An hour and a half is more than I expected....I'll have to watch it later tonight and smoke the last of this local I got.
 
Apr 25, 2002
7,347
129
0
43
#3
ima check it out later too.. i'ma be high too.. ha.. i'm always high.. i seen loose change 2nd edition and that movie pissed me off.. i wish they showed this type of shit on primetime on a huge channel abc, nbc, fox etc.

:dead:
 
May 11, 2002
4,039
12
0
45
#8
I just dont know how the goverment could of pulled this off. This is where the Loose Change video fails to address, is the whole grand scheme of all these bombs being planted, yet nobody comes forward to say anything.

I used to be a big beliver in the 9/11 conspiracy, however I have a lot of questions I need answered before I totally belive all of the conspiracies.
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,283
113
#10
BaSICCally said:
I just dont know how the goverment could of pulled this off. This is where the Loose Change video fails to address, is the whole grand scheme of all these bombs being planted, yet nobody comes forward to say anything.

I used to be a big beliver in the 9/11 conspiracy, however I have a lot of questions I need answered before I totally belive all of the conspiracies.
Did you watch the one i posted?

And who is gonna come forward?

No one came forward on the Kennedy assassination....why would they come forward on this?

And who is "nobody"?Do you mean people actually INVOLVED in the plan?If so,why in the HELL would they do that?THe whole point of doing something faulty...is to NOT get caught....
 

TROLL

Sicc OG
Aug 8, 2003
5,360
22
0
43
#11
BaSICCally said:
I just dont know how the goverment could of pulled this off. This is where the Loose Change video fails to address, is the whole grand scheme of all these bombs being planted, yet nobody comes forward to say anything.
thats actually an easy question that ive heard former CIA analyists and investigators answer numerous times.. when you have a governement whos communications is seperated into departments, info isnt passed clearly or at all and the opportunity to get these departments to do things for one agenda is easy if u give the order to do this or that and not say exactly why its done... and there are people who have came out and said something but they dont get coverage.. for instance... how would the security at WTC7 (contracted by brother of george w bush).. know that bombs were planted when they were not allowed to do there patrols or allowed access to certain areas? their boss "georges brother" signed the order to allow 'certain' people and equipment in but not security.. same with both towers.... these crews could have been planting charges and not known what they were for and had someone come back, re-wire them and set the detonators.. which keeps the number of insiders to a minimum


BaSICCally said:
I used to be a big beliver in the 9/11 conspiracy, however I have a lot of questions I need answered before I totally belive all of the conspiracies.
i didnt believe it at first either... but the questions that arise that lead it to be true far outnumber the questions i have that lead to it being fake...

by all means feel free to ask any questions pertaining to 9/11...
 
May 11, 2002
4,039
12
0
45
#12
Edward Thizzerhands said:
Did you watch the one i posted?

And who is gonna come forward?

No one came forward on the Kennedy assassination....why would they come forward on this?

And who is "nobody"?Do you mean people actually INVOLVED in the plan?If so,why in the HELL would they do that?THe whole point of doing something faulty...is to NOT get caught....

I watched the video, a lot of it was redundant, however I did find it very informative. Dont get me wrong, I lean more to the conspiracy therorists, more so.

However I feel a lot of the information offered is not backed up by sufficent evidence. ie the chemicals at the bottom of the rubble. Where can I get any information confirming this?

plus the interview at the end, the "steel" expert, if you listen to the beginging of the interview, he says " im totally a manager..." blah blah. Then he goes into some tangent about the demolition which has nothing to do with the steel.

I did like the news interviews, especially the one with Silverstein and the head of the FEMA, who was at the trade centers the day before.

Also the urban renewal concept, that the towers were brought down because they were deemed as old and unable to hanndle the high tech world. The only thing is they do not offer a resource which can be quotted where it is said that the world trade centers were unable to be upgraded.

I just want to re empasize that I do accept SOME of the conspiracy, however without reliable sources I can only assume that a lot of the video is based on assumptions.