No it is not. Atheism means that you lack the belief in a god.
This is PART of the definition (or one definition), and I agree that it does mean that which is why I said, "You have people who do not BELIEVE/WORSHIP God (because they are athiest), and you have people who believe God does not EXIST (because they are athiest)." If you have no BELIEF IN a god OR you believe God does not exist (due to lack of evidence etc) you are an athiest.
There are people who believe in a diety and do not worship them.
Name one. A buddhist may believe that Buddah existed, but how many believe
IN buddah? Muslims believe that mohammad existed, but they do not believe
IN him. If you believe
IN God, you
WORSHIP God. If you have NO belief IN God you do not WORSHIP God. What you are failing to grasp is I am making a distinction between believing IN a diety and simply believing a diety exists. Take the ancient followers of Ra for example. They believed IN Ra, and while they knew of Isis or Osiris and had a belief of them/believed they existed, they ultimately believed
in Ra which is who they
worshipped or who they were devoted to.
I believe mohammad existed. Do I believe IN him? No.
Well that's what it is and most all atheists accept the common definitions of weak and strong atheism
Again, you have two things here. A lack of belief IN a diety OR a belief that dieties do NOT exist.
Didn't read all of it but the author should should look into agnosticism further:
You should:
Atheism, therefore, is the absence of theistic belief. One who does not believe in the existence of a god or supernatural being is properly designated as an atheist." Atheism is sometimes defined as 'the belief that there is no God of any kind,' or the claim that a god cannot exist. While these are categories of atheism, they do not exhaust the meaning of atheism--and are somewhat misleading with respect to the basic nature of atheism.
Atheism, in its basic form, is not a belief: it is the absence of belief. An atheist is not primarily a person who *believes* that a god does not exist, rather he does not believe in the existence of a god."
- George Smith, Atheism: The Case Against God (Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1989), p. 7.
I am referring to athiesm as the LACK OF (which is why I said, "No one said it was not, however what one should consider is how one classifies
the lack of belief.)
Because inaccurate means to be incorrect or false, which is what you said.
It is false because he is clumping all of christianity together, and it is incorrect to say "christians worship the trinity" because you have "christians" who do NOT worship the trinity (refer to oneness/unitarinists or pentecostals.) So, with that being said his statement is an inaccurate/false generalization derived from his obvious misunderstanding/lack of knowledge pertaining to the religion.
It's a moot point anyways since we all agree there are more than one varation of satanism.
Yet he was not accurate in his assessment of the christian religion. Whats fair for the goose?