9/11 Paranoia,and Conspiracy Nut Jobs
- Thread starter BAMMER
- Start date
Dirty nutz...... what kind of scientific research are you looking for? Would you like to research the twin towers debris and rubble? Would you like to scower through it all and find plasma cut steel beams at 45 degree angles? Well guess what? The largest crime scene in the united states of america was packed up, gaurded by military personel with automatic machine guns, sent out of the country, and melted into nothing.....So what are you looking for exactly that would be justified as "scientific evidence"? Why dont you send a letter to Guliani and ask him why he would make such a decision with his former experiance of being a lawyer and knowing how important evidence in a crime scene is....lemme know what he says...
^^ .
If it was real "scientific research", it wouldn't be hosted on 911review.com, which also includes such nuggets as "The Attack and Cover-Up" and "Examines possible means used to execute the attack" right on the front page.
This is not a site that is aiming to shed light on possible alternative theories. This is a site that has only one goal: to convince people that 9/11 was a government conspiracy and that no other story is even remotely possible.
That is not science. That is one-sided propaganda, just like what you would claim "the Media" is.
If it was real "scientific research", it wouldn't be hosted on 911review.com, which also includes such nuggets as "The Attack and Cover-Up" and "Examines possible means used to execute the attack" right on the front page.
This is not a site that is aiming to shed light on possible alternative theories. This is a site that has only one goal: to convince people that 9/11 was a government conspiracy and that no other story is even remotely possible.
That is not science. That is one-sided propaganda, just like what you would claim "the Media" is.
what? do u expect cnn, fox, or NBC to not be slanted??.. your going to have a hard time convinceing others otherwise harold..
anyway...
vvvv
last resort of a failing arguement,(pay attention everyone, harry leans on this disinfo tactic like a fat girl climbin staircases.. refute the source without a reason to doubt the claim
its the offical story thats being refuted, your so far to the right it hurts to hear anything critical of your own slantings..
media sure is... u can say its "not science" when even scientists refute the story and would laugh loudly at your face if u were to say that around them, YOU not being a scientist and all..
anyway...
vvvv
last resort of a failing arguement,(pay attention everyone, harry leans on this disinfo tactic like a fat girl climbin staircases.. refute the source without a reason to doubt the claim
its the offical story thats being refuted, your so far to the right it hurts to hear anything critical of your own slantings..
media sure is... u can say its "not science" when even scientists refute the story and would laugh loudly at your face if u were to say that around them, YOU not being a scientist and all..