Dirty Shoez said:
"Public knowledge"
**waits for PrisonPlanet links full of phrases like "an unnamed Senior White House official confirms that..." and other nonsense**
so are u denying that osama was funded by the CIA?
vvv
(sorry no prison planet links)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Saudi born Osama bin Laden was recruited during the Soviet-Afghan war "ironically under the auspices of the CIA, to fight Soviet invaders
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO109C.html
Bin Laden comes home to roost:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3340101/
Bin Laden: the former CIA 'client' obsessed with training pilots
http://www.guardian.co.uk/wtccrash/story/0,,551037,00.html
CIA agent alleged to have met Bin Laden in July(months before 9/11)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/waronterror/story/0,1361,584444,00.html
jayda650 said:
LOl where did you get this so called public knowledge from?
when somethings reported in the news it pretty much becomes public knowledge...
jayda650 said:
Only one i know for a fact thats true is that we were helping Bin Ladin fight the russians in the 80s I doubt highly that we have been funding him till 99 since that war ended 10 years prior. Yall watch too much TV and read too many conspiracy theory websites.
yes, and if the CIA werent worried about their asset two months prior to 9/11 why would they go visit him in a hospital in dubai?
jayda650 said:
I hear alot of theories but never any kind of concrete evidence to back any of those out there theories up. Our government may do alot of bad things but people play them out to be like super villians from a comic book, alot of that shit yall preach is a little too far fetched for me to believe.
so because its too far fetched to believe, YET you choose not to listen even when theres no information debating it? remember tho, a theory is no longer a theory when theres evidence provided.
jayda650 said:
I mean damn i could write a bunch of bullshit and back it up with even more bullshit and i'm sure some people will believe it but its still a bunch of bullshit. If the things you say are true, credable journalists would have spoke on it and not all these conspiracy theory crackpots.
check the msnbc and guardian links i posted.. i can find some from bbc if u want also.. these arent sites some 'crackpot' made... it purposefully gets little coverage..
jayda650 said:
Your answer to that would most likley be, "those 'credible' journalists all work for the Illuminati and are all part of this big conspiracy to keep 9/11 and 100 other evil things under wraps" might as well believe the crazy apocalypse guy on the corner with the "the end is near" sign.
does the crazy apocolypse guy have any information on his claim? even former bush cabinet members came speaking out.. u figured that would be enough raise at least some kind of alarm... but oh well.. to be honest, the information is out there, and if someone reads it knowing they arent going to believe it or even consider its implications, that person is biased for other reasons.. u dont have to believe it.. thats your Prerogative.. but before u hop into a debate about it... do your own research before claiming someone is a 'conspiracy crackpot' cuz unless you have info to show otherwise, you just look like a imperialist cheerleader...
so if u will please... forward any counter info u may come across to this thread.. i gave plenty of information for u to do ur detective work and check its credebility..
vvvvv
http://siccness.net/vb/showthread.php?t=203982&highlight=offical+9/11