2003 NL WEST CHAMPS
- Thread starter cHeWdOGG
- Start date
Back the fuck up homie. The FACTS are the OAKLAND A'S have brought 4 World Series Trophies to the Bay Area while the Giantpussies haven't done SHIT. Period. Bottom line: Oakland Colisuem says "HOME OF WORLD CHAMPIONS" and bitch ass FagBalls park says NOTHING because the Giantpussies trophy room is fucking EMPTY!!!! Fairy Bonds will retire with NO World Series ring. All your talk about "World Series" is a fucking joke. Talk to me when those fruits actually WIN a World Series. I don't even HAVE to mention the SWEEP of '89.
Like I said, talk to me when those fruits actually WIN a World Series. Ain't no one hating on the Giantpussies. They have nothing but an empty trophy case to be jealous of. I'm only stating FACTS that the Oakland A's have ALWAYS been the best baseball team in the Bay Area. And I forgot to add, not only did Oakland bring FOUR World Series trophies to the Bay Area while the Giantpussies have NONE, but The A's came to the Bay Area 10 fucking years AFTER the Giantpussies. Now THAT'S fucking pathetic. Fairy Bonds is gonna leave the Giantpussies with NO World Series ring and go DH for the faggot ass Angels like he said he wanted to do.
Hey... be kind to the giants. They will actually win someday, be it this year or next, or whatever.
I like the A's because they do it without any kind of cash at all(50 million total), where as the Giants do it by paying players as much as 15 million each.
I wouldn't be suprised if the Giants do win the series... with the amount of money they spend on their team, they should at least have a shot at it.
With what the A's have spent in the last three years, they shouldn't have any kind of shot, and yet they've won more games than anybody.
I have strong childhood memories of Candlestick Park, but I've come to really appreciate the A's. A team that shouldn't win at all, but still does.
I like the A's because they do it without any kind of cash at all(50 million total), where as the Giants do it by paying players as much as 15 million each.
I wouldn't be suprised if the Giants do win the series... with the amount of money they spend on their team, they should at least have a shot at it.
With what the A's have spent in the last three years, they shouldn't have any kind of shot, and yet they've won more games than anybody.
I have strong childhood memories of Candlestick Park, but I've come to really appreciate the A's. A team that shouldn't win at all, but still does.
The funnier thing is, how Giant fans think that attendance wins championships. That and the fake Giant fans that go to PacBell Park, but NEVER went to Candlestick. Funny how a ballpark draws a crowd when the TEAM is supposed to draw the crowd. Also, I didn't know that attendance wins World Championships. Oh by the way, it wouldn't matter if me and the Colisuem janitor were the only ones at an A's game. Shit, they could play at a high school baseball field or in my backyard, all of that is irrelevant. The only thing that DOES matter is OAKLAND has WON FOUR WORLD SERIES' while SF has won NOTHING. Period. That's the bottom line. I'll take our World Championships over attendance ANY day. By the way, I've seen my team win championships in MY lifetime, can YOU say the same?
BTW: What in the HELL do A's fans have to be jealous of the Giants? Their dusty, empty trophy case? What? Please tell me, I'd love to know. I could use a laugh.
BTW: What in the HELL do A's fans have to be jealous of the Giants? Their dusty, empty trophy case? What? Please tell me, I'd love to know. I could use a laugh.
Caput187um- FYI Bonds is the only player on the giants making over 10 mil. but regardless, giants have a larger payroll because they have more money. the a's have a small payroll because they have no money.
Hay$tack$avage- You pretty much answered your own question. rambling on and shit. but really. the giants history ranks up there in the top 5. and I wasnt even talking about the attendance. you brought that up yourself. of course people would rather go the pac bell park than the horrible oakland coliseum. I am talking about the fans overall. no matter where you go there will be more giants fans than a's fans with an exception of maybe oakland and a few other east bay cities, but even in alot of east bay cities there are hella giants fans. you will not find many a's fans anywhere other than the east bay.
Hay$tack$avage- You pretty much answered your own question. rambling on and shit. but really. the giants history ranks up there in the top 5. and I wasnt even talking about the attendance. you brought that up yourself. of course people would rather go the pac bell park than the horrible oakland coliseum. I am talking about the fans overall. no matter where you go there will be more giants fans than a's fans with an exception of maybe oakland and a few other east bay cities, but even in alot of east bay cities there are hella giants fans. you will not find many a's fans anywhere other than the east bay.
I was hoping nobody would point that thing about Bonds out:classic:
It's true that Giants draw way more fans, and that's why they have more cash, but the reason for the disparity is not important.
What's important is that the A's do more with less.
The Giants spend 85 million(will be more next year), the A's spend 50.
The Giants don't spend shit compare to other teams in the league 85 million aint' shit. Wire to Wire first team to clinch hopefully the A's will even make it to the playoffs.
P.S. Why does A's fans talk about championships when in football they get mad when 49ers fans talk about 5 time champs never lost a superbowl.
P.S. Why does A's fans talk about championships when in football they get mad when 49ers fans talk about 5 time champs never lost a superbowl.