peep da cd cover what ch'all think???

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Oct 10, 2002
2,670
31
0
47
skichdesigns.com
#2
More elements are needed......The bling bling diamonded text is lacking on its shine..(But it'll be sick if it were loud)..The cover overall is lacking though....Theirs no story to it.....IMHO
 
Aug 27, 2002
1,320
2
0
41
www.myspace.com
#9
all 3 of those wouldnt sell that big, theyre all so bland and homeade......

get rid of the 420 garbage, and the weed leaves all over suspektz clothes thats lookin like 3rd grade shit.....the compilation cover has got lots wrong with it.... blah blah oh well
 
May 4, 2002
3,769
20
38
39
www.myspace.com
#10
the rest of y'all thanx for your constructive critizism but $ic K's ass was just bitchin. my shit is made to look like that its got a different type of design an unprofessional ass style really but thats jus my shit 4 real.....

and also that "4:20 shit" is apart of tha title:Verbal Assault; 4:20
 
Apr 25, 2002
688
5
0
43
www.geocities.com
#12
your "target meaning" was missed, I think you need to go back to the drawing board on these... the first one, has me lost as to WHO the dude with his eyes closed smokin' a cigarette is, and what the 4:20 has to do with it, the fire around the border of that photograph looks cheap, like you used eye candy's fire filter, none of the text seems to take charge and step up as a title or a name... the second one has a lot better organization, but the web/digital camera photo needs to be changed out. Again the name of the artist and the title should pop off the background more, you don't want people to think you're not proud of this product by hiding the name into the cover, also the house is cut out horrifically, it looks like a first grader did it before going to recess.... the third one is probably the worst, it has NO FOCAL point, your eye just wonders around noticing how uneven the bricks are, and the text seems really plain, did you use MS Paint to do this one? and the black text gets lost in some of the bricks... hope this helped, but even if you were going for a "different type of design an unprofessional ass style" you still need to have BASIC elements of design, no matter how cheap it looks, you have to be able to draw someone into lookin' at it, none of these did this. They all would be passed by and no one would remember them, even if they were billboards
 

noWetaG

Super Moderator
Apr 24, 2002
3,446
439
0
46
GateWonProduct.com
#13
The Unkut said:
my shit is made to look like that its got a different type of design an unprofessional ass style really but thats jus my shit 4 real.....
so..ummm...what ur basically sayin is
ur capable of professional-quality work,
but DONT cuz u like it lookin swap-meet-CD style? :confused:
 
Aug 27, 2002
1,320
2
0
41
www.myspace.com
#14
lol how im i bitchin....bitchin would mean im saying its weak cuz ur tryin to top me or some shit, makin excuses u know


right there i was just telling u how i felt becuz i wouldnt buy any of those juzt cuz the cover looked like my girlfriend made em n shit feel me.....i wasnt meanin anything bad juzt tellin u what i thought, why do people always ask what people think then criticize the people after they give there "opinions"...
 
May 4, 2002
3,769
20
38
39
www.myspace.com
#16
ConnDemned said:
your "target meaning" was missed, I think you need to go back to the drawing board on these... the first one, has me lost as to WHO the dude with his eyes closed smokin' a cigarette is, and what the 4:20 has to do with it, the fire around the border of that photograph looks cheap, like you used eye candy's fire filter,
yuuup but, that's a wet stick, not a cigarette and that ain't even fire actually its a picture that got fucked up and just looks like fire...LOL but anyway i'll change dem bitchez anyway and yess i used MS paint except on suspekt's cover...
but my style isn't too good marketing n shit so i ain't gon do tha front cover but i'll do tha inside design.