pats db arrington leads the league in picks......
raiiders avg 50 yards less than the pats do on defense....
Pats average what 180 yards more on offense than the raiders
pats are +2 on TO
Raiders are +3 on TO
Pats have played MIA,SD and BUF (offensive ranks 12,4 and 3)
Raiders have played DEN,BUF and NYJ (offensive ranks 27, 4 and 16)
my point is, pats have worse defensive #s because they have played better offensive teams....
oh and btw. stealers are worst in the league with -9 TO difference, does it mean they are the worst team in the league?
raiiders avg 50 yards less than the pats do on defense....
Pats average what 180 yards more on offense than the raiders
pats are +2 on TO
Raiders are +3 on TO
Pats have played MIA,SD and BUF (offensive ranks 12,4 and 3)
Raiders have played DEN,BUF and NYJ (offensive ranks 27, 4 and 16)
my point is, pats have worse defensive #s because they have played better offensive teams....
oh and btw. stealers are worst in the league with -9 TO difference, does it mean they are the worst team in the league?
you can say the pats have worse numbers defensively because they had better competition, but what good does that do them against us? we have one of the best offenses in the league. we have the best rushing offense and have double the rushing TDs of our closest competition.
your only point is that you don't like the raiders and won't give us credit even after we dominated one of the best defensive teams in the league. you can counter that by saying I'm just a homer, but I wouldn't be saying we'll have another dominate win if we were playing the packers, SD, or houston tomorrow.