Who Owns the Rights on Tamiflu: Rumsfeld To Profit From Bird Flu Hoax

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 14, 2002
6,278
6,950
113
43
#1
Full story


by Dr. Joseph Mercola

October 26, 2005
mercola.com

We bring to the attention of Global Research readers this important commentary by Dr.Joseph Mercola.

The fundamental issue is who owns the intellectual property rights over Tamiflu. The media reports suggest that the Swiss pharmaceutical company Roche will make billions.

While the drug is produced by Roche, it was developed by Gilead Sciences Inc.which owns the intellectual property rights. Gilead, which has maintained a low profile, has outsourced the production to Roche.

Donald Rumsfeld was appointed Chairman of Gilead Sciences, Inc. in 1997, a position which he held in the years prior to becoming Secretary of Defense.in the Bush adminstration. Rumsfeld had been on the Board of Directors from the establishment of Gilead in 1987.

As confirmed in a company press statement in 1997, Donald H. Rumsfeld assumed the position of Chairman, of GILEAD: :

"Gilead is fortunate to have had Don Rumsfeld as a stalwart board member since the company's earliest days, and we are very pleased that he has accepted the Chairmanship," Dr. Riordan said. "He has played an important role in helping to build and steer the company. His broad experience in leadership positions in both industry and government will serve us well as Gilead continues to build its commercial presence."

According to company statement: Gilead Science Inc "has been active in the development of inhibitors for the potential treatment and prevention of viral influenza and protease inhibitors for the potential treatment of HIV"

"The Company's research and development efforts encompass three interrelated programs: small molecule antivirals, cardiovascular therapeutics and genetic code blockers for cancer and other diseases. Gilead's expertise in each of these areas has also resulted in the discovery and development of non-nucleotide product candidates, including neuraminidase inhibitors for the potential treatment and prevention of viral influenza and protease inhibitors for the potential treatment of HIV"

Also find below an article published in the SF Chronicle, which points to the relationship between GILEAD and Roche in relation to the Rights over Tami Flu.
 
Jun 27, 2003
2,457
10
0
39
#4
mayn, this news is old as shit..

I never understood why the news would even report that bird flu had a significant death rate considering the known cases were in fuckin southeast Asia where healthcare aint so advanced.

Just look at how bush had already given his pal rummy the big money contracts even tho this bird flu is hardly any threat..
 
May 14, 2002
6,278
6,950
113
43
#5
Hardly any thread? I think time will tell.. there are several known cases of the bird flu in turkey, started of at the Iran border and moving up to touristic area's. Since Turkey is a very popular touristic place for many people throughout europe it might be considerd a very big thread. Going out from that cases in Turkey are real
 
Jun 27, 2003
2,457
10
0
39
#6
iaoish said:
Hardly any thread? I think time will tell.. there are several known cases of the bird flu in turkey, started of at the Iran border and moving up to touristic area's. Since Turkey is a very popular touristic place for many people throughout europe it might be considerd a very big thread. Going out from that cases in Turkey are real
thread or threat?? You said it twice, but I think you meant threat.

Anyway, studies have come out saying that it's not much of a threat. The mortality rate is skewed because of the area where the flu began. Of course if you have shitty healthcare, you're really young, or really old, your chances of dying are gonna be high.
 
Oct 10, 2002
672
13
18
str8ball.free.fr
#7
the risk is that the virus evolves (it will) in a way that it would be transmissible between humans. However tamiflu is not against H5N1 but against the regular flu it has no effect on H5N1.
 
May 14, 2002
6,278
6,950
113
43
#8
Jae iLL said:
thread or threat?? You said it twice, but I think you meant threat.

Anyway, studies have come out saying that it's not much of a threat. The mortality rate is skewed because of the area where the flu began. Of course if you have shitty healthcare, you're really young, or really old, your chances of dying are gonna be high.
excuse me for my bad english =] I meant threat indeed. I don't believe in 'studies' anymore they alway's change their outcome every few years.. so for me time will have to tell me if it's gonna be a pandemie or not