What y'all think about AFRO-CENTRISM and CHEIKH ANTA DIOP?
- Thread starter Cante-up
- Start date
considering that our history in public schools (k-12) are portrayed through an Euro-centristic lens, i don't think its "bullshit"
yes of course one view or another is going to be flawed because racial seperation of history is not going to do much about teach a holisitc view, but then again, when are we ever going to accomplish that?
(consider events, one person wants to save face and says he didn't get hit that bad in the face and that the dudehe was fighting was being ridiculous, but to most bystanders they thought that he got fucked up real bad adn that he actually started the fight with belligerent actions.)
yes of course one view or another is going to be flawed because racial seperation of history is not going to do much about teach a holisitc view, but then again, when are we ever going to accomplish that?
(consider events, one person wants to save face and says he didn't get hit that bad in the face and that the dudehe was fighting was being ridiculous, but to most bystanders they thought that he got fucked up real bad adn that he actually started the fight with belligerent actions.)
Agree completely. I was reading a very interesting book one time about this subject, very interesting when you would compare those views found in the book to the views we learn in school. I was talking to a teacher about it one time and he asked me "Well, are we (the school system) wrong or is this book wrong? What side should we follow? What do you think is the right side?" and I was thinking about it a lot and came to the conclusion, you should read about it and believe what you want, since this is what our text books do. They only teach us the European view on it all, they never mention the "other side". So why not teach that side as well as the African side and compare the two. Then take these teachings and come to your own conclusion about it all. We can rarely have guaranteed facts on these subjects, so just learn the way you were taught, come to the outcome you feel is right. You got two sides to compare, believe what you feel is right.
lol yup, and i did a project that gave a "mexican/native american" view point moreso than the common good for european immigrants, about california(regarding gold rush era)
everyone thought i was just weird except the mexicans in that class lol.
its like the other side(of the story) was considered a 'conspiracy' theory to them,and they could "choose" not to believe it since its not in the school books and not part of their heritage. LOL.
everyone thought i was just weird except the mexicans in that class lol.
its like the other side(of the story) was considered a 'conspiracy' theory to them,and they could "choose" not to believe it since its not in the school books and not part of their heritage. LOL.
its not because you like a version better than another, it means its the truth.
there is a lots of historians all over the world who COMPLETLY destroyed in their books the theory of ANTA DIOP.
Problem is that you are considered a racist if you denies afro-centrists theories.ANTA diop is a fraud and people who believes him never read books that say the contrary because anti diop books are wriiten by highlevel teachers, academics.These books are hard to read not like the books of ANTA DIOP which are really easy to understand.They are not enough entertaining for common ignorant people.
there is a lots of historians all over the world who COMPLETLY destroyed in their books the theory of ANTA DIOP.
Problem is that you are considered a racist if you denies afro-centrists theories.ANTA diop is a fraud and people who believes him never read books that say the contrary because anti diop books are wriiten by highlevel teachers, academics.These books are hard to read not like the books of ANTA DIOP which are really easy to understand.They are not enough entertaining for common ignorant people.
