Washington smacks Zona

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

CZAR

Sicc OG
Aug 25, 2003
7,269
1,375
0
52
#2
This wasnt that much of a surprise especially since AZ is struggling & plus their best player Stoudamire didnt play!! The Wac 10 is still a weak conference and wont get more than 2-3 teams in the tourney!! GOT EM!!
 
Nov 16, 2003
218
0
0
#4
u know what, what czar said is true but if they take two or three from the pac right now washington is in, thats all i know. and not since fuckin detlef schrepf played for uw have we done this and all 5 starters are coming back next year. my boy tre simmons wit the 3 pointer at the end? straight outta green river community college baby!! lol

yall just wait till we knock off stanford's undefeated ass in a few weeks (cross fingers)
 
Apr 25, 2002
3,970
15
38
42
#5
UW

KayDubb said:
and not since fuckin detlef schrepf played for uw have we done this and all 5 starters are coming back next year. my boy tre simmons wit the 3 pointer at the end? straight outta green river community college baby!! lol

yall just wait till we knock off stanford's undefeated ass in a few weeks (cross fingers)
Washington wins 2 of their next 3 plus 1 in the tourney and their in.

Actually UW was in the Tourney in 98 and 99, advancing to the Sweet 16 in 98 and lost on a last second shot by UConn Rip Hamilton.

I think it would be fucking tight if Stanford came into Seattle undefeated but I have a feeling WSU will beat them in Pullman b/c WSU coach is a genius and Pullman is a remote place. I know its crazy, just a hunch.

And yeah the Dawgs do have everybody significant for 2 or 3 more years. They are so young, nearly all of them are from the 206, this is such a likable team.
 
May 15, 2002
5,879
8
0
51
#7
UW needs to beat zon st and cal and reach the pac-10 tourney final and beat or lose closely to zona or stanford to make the tourney. If not, then off to the NIT to face other Wac 10 schools
 
Apr 25, 2002
3,970
15
38
42
#8
marcus said:
The Huskies aren't a factor, mark those words.
I know they aren't a national championship contender if that's what scale you're talking about. But they are a bubble team who is hot enough to win a game or two in the NCAAs if they can squeeze in.
 

BAMMER

Siccness Gray Hair
Apr 25, 2002
5,828
479
83
48
Auburn Wa
www.dawgman.com
#10
Re: UW

xpanther206 said:
I think it would be fucking tight if Stanford came into Seattle undefeated but I have a feeling WSU will beat them in Pullman b/c WSU coach is a genius and Pullman is a remote place. I know its crazy, just a hunch.


HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
Credibility--------------------Denied

GURU AURA
 
May 10, 2002
1,392
0
0
44
#11
THE PAC 10 IS FAR FROM WILD THIS YEAR, I LIKE STANFORD AND CAL BUT FACT IS THIS IS THE WACKEST THE PAC 10 AS A WHOLE HAS BEEN IN LIKE 10 YEARS,

IM PRETTY SURE JUSTIN DAVIS IS GONNA BE BACK FOR STANFORD SO THAT UPSET IS NOT HAPPENING.
 
Apr 25, 2002
3,970
15
38
42
#13
Re: Re: UW

BAMMER said:
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
Credibility--------------------Denied

GURU AURA
Yeah I know I am putting my balls out on the line a little bit here. I am not putting any kind of guru guarantee on this one, it's just a little hunch. I hope it doesn't happen though b/c I want Stanford undefeated coming into the Dawghouse.
 
Apr 25, 2002
3,970
15
38
42
#14
Playa510 said:
THE PAC 10 IS FAR FROM WILD THIS YEAR, I LIKE STANFORD AND CAL BUT FACT IS THIS IS THE WACKEST THE PAC 10 AS A WHOLE HAS BEEN IN LIKE 10 YEARS,
I didn't say it was good I said it was wild and that's because it is. It's wild as FUCK when the 2nd place team in the conference went 0-5 to start conference play!
 
Apr 25, 2002
3,970
15
38
42
#15
Re: Re: Re: UW

xpanther206 said:
Yeah I know I am putting my balls out on the line a little bit here. I am not putting any kind of guru guarantee on this one, it's just a little hunch. I hope it doesn't happen though b/c I want Stanford undefeated coming into the Dawghouse.
I ended up being wrong but HOLY SHIT it almost happened.
 
Apr 25, 2002
1,372
2
0
40
#17
Re: Re: Re: Re: UW

xpanther206 said:
I ended up being wrong but HOLY SHIT it almost happened.
Correction...SHOULD'VE happened. Stanford would've gone home with their tails tucked in if that goddamn ref had the visual capacity to SEE THE FUCKIN TIMEOUT CALL. What a bunch of bullshit.

Stanford = Lucky Bastards

Oh well...Im cheering for em now. I hope they fuck the Huskies up.
 

BAMMER

Siccness Gray Hair
Apr 25, 2002
5,828
479
83
48
Auburn Wa
www.dawgman.com
#19
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: UW

YoungVicious said:
Correction...SHOULD'VE happened. Stanford would've gone home with their tails tucked in if that goddamn ref had the visual capacity to SEE THE FUCKIN TIMEOUT CALL. What a bunch of bullshit.

Stanford = Lucky Bastards

Oh well...Im cheering for em now. I hope they fuck the Huskies up.
Let's see how the Cardinal do against the good Washington team.

Washington 3 (bask,bask,foot)
Washington St. 0 (nothing)
 
Apr 25, 2002
3,970
15
38
42
#20
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: UW

BAMMER said:
Let's see how the Cardinal do against the good Washington team.

Washington 3 (bask,bask,foot)
Washington St. 0 (nothing)
Real talk. Even Terrell Owens talked about how the Cougars COUGED IT the other night.