Secret services say Iran is trying to assemble a nuclear missile

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 14, 2002
6,278
6,950
113
43
#1
Source: The Guardian

Document seen by Guardian details web of front companies and middlemen

Ian Cobain and Ian Traynor
Wednesday January 4, 2006
The Guardian


The Iranian government has been successfully scouring Europe for the sophisticated equipment needed to develop a nuclear bomb, according to the latest western intelligence assessment of the country's weapons programmes.
Scientists in Tehran are also shopping for parts for a ballistic missile capable of reaching Europe, with "import requests and acquisitions ... registered almost daily", the report seen by the Guardian concludes.

The warning came as Iran raised the stakes in its dispute with the United States and the European Union yesterday by notifying the International Atomic Energy Authority that it intended to resume nuclear fuel research next week. Tehran has refused to rule out a return to attempts at uranium enrichment, the key to the development of a nuclear weapon.

The 55-page intelligence assessment, dated July 1 2005, draws upon material gathered by British, French, German and Belgian agencies, and has been used to brief European government ministers and to warn leading industrialists of the need for vigilance when exporting equipment or expertise to so-called rogue states.
It concludes that Syria and Pakistan have also been buying technology and chemicals needed to develop rocket programmes and to enrich uranium. It outlines the role played by Russia in the escalating Middle East arms build-up, and examines the part that dozens of Chinese front companies have played in North Korea's nuclear weapons programme.

But it is the detailed assessment of Iran's nuclear purchasing programme that will most most alarm western leaders, who have long refused to believe Tehran's insistence that it is not interested in developing nuclear weapons and is trying only to develop nuclear power for electricity. Governments in the west and elsewhere have also been dismayed by recent pronouncements from the Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has said that Holocaust denial is a "scientific debate" and that Israel should be "wiped off the map".

The leak of the intelligence report may signal a growing frustration at Iran's refusal to bow to western demands that it abandon its programme to produce fuel for a Russian-built nuclear reactor due to come on stream this year.

The assessment declares that Iran has developed an extensive web of front companies, official bodies, academic institutes and middlemen dedicated to obtaining - in western Europe and in the former Soviet Union - the expertise, training, and equipment for nuclear programmes, missile development, and biological and chemical weapons arsenals.

"In addition to sensitive goods, Iran continues intensively to seek the technology and know-how for military applications of all kinds," it says.

The document lists scores of Iranian companies and institutions involved in the arms race. It also details Tehran's growing determination to perfect a ballistic missile capable of delivering warheads far beyond its borders.

It notes that Iran harbours ambitions of developing a space programme, but is currently concentrating on upgrading and extending the range of its Shahab-3 missile, which has a range of 750 miles - capable of reaching Israel.

Iranian scientists are said to be building wind tunnels to assist in missile design, developing navigation technology, and acquiring metering and calibration technology, motion simulators and x-ray machines designed to examine rocket parts. The next generation of the Shahab ("shooting star" in Persian) should be capable of reaching Austria and Italy.




-------------------------------------------



Seems to be a lot happening in Iran, but I don't think that it's all true... could might aswell be another excuse to invade another country on someones blacklist
 
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#2
they had two choices go the rout of lybia or go the rout they are going. they saw if you don't have nukes you get invaded (iraq) if you do have nukes they pull troops away from you(korea).

i'd build nukes too, plus if they use the plants for power they develop a source of power so they can then sell more of their oil internationally.

then of course all they have to do is look east and see the world powers falling over eachother to supply military and economic aid to india and pakistan (both nuke holders).
 

I AM

Some Random Asshole
Apr 25, 2002
21,001
86
48
#3
I think if we build nukes, we can't say shit to anyone else. That's some bullshit..."We're the US so we can do whatever we want, but to those of you out there populating the rest of the planet, you dont' get to do shit except what we think is right.." FUCK THAT. If the US didn't want others doing it, they should have set a better example and not done it in the first place.
 
Jul 10, 2002
2,180
18
0
46
#4
Nuclear power is awesome, it has some great potential benefits...

It is also scary, i.e. Hiroshima or Chernobyl :(
 
Oct 28, 2005
2,980
25
0
42
www.myspace.com
#5
Sixxness said:
I think if we build nukes, we can't say shit to anyone else. That's some bullshit..."We're the US so we can do whatever we want, but to those of you out there populating the rest of the planet, you dont' get to do shit except what we think is right.." FUCK THAT. If the US didn't want others doing it, they should have set a better example and not done it in the first place.
Ever research the IAEA or NPT inbetween running your mouth about shit you have no clue about?

I swear to God you'll run your dick-suckers about the Geneva conventions one minute, then the next start talking about "If we can build nukes, anybody should be able to". Shit is hilarious and disturbing at the same time.




At the pace Iran is going, they won't have a nuke program to worry about. Tens of thousands of people die in an earthquake, and during that period, they're spending billions on nuclear equipment. The people will not tolerate that for much longer.
 

I AM

Some Random Asshole
Apr 25, 2002
21,001
86
48
#6
I didn't disrespect you, so dont come at me like that. I can speak my opinion whether you agree or not. What I was sayin is common sense. Oh and I didn't mention the Geneva Conventions in ANYTHING I've said, EVER on here. If I specifically said, "blah blah blah Geneva Conventions" you point it out and let me know. Until then, dont' be a bitch about the fact that you disagree with me. I'm not callin you names so grow up.
 
Oct 28, 2005
2,980
25
0
42
www.myspace.com
#7
You've been disrespecting me lately in other threads (NW Group thread, for one), so i have done the same here. If you don't like it, then continue to set the example you did here. But drop the "Stop the Ad Hominem" act.

The fact of the matter is, that if you sign treaties saying you aren't going to develop weapons, you should not remain a signatory and go after those weapons anyways. You should do the right thing, and either cancel your weapons program or drop out of the treaty. But continuing to lie is only going to lead to more scrutiny.
 
Dec 25, 2003
12,356
218
0
70
#9
Oppenheimer actually later very much regretted what he had done and become a voice for total nuclear disarmament.

I think nukes are like alchohol. You ain't gonna stop underage drinking...you can't stop this.
 
Jun 27, 2005
5,207
0
0
#11
LOL, here we go again with this shit. I remember a couple years ago when Iraq "definitely had WMDS." It doesnt fuckin matter if they do or not. If that dumb ass president of ours wants to do it for any unjust reason at all, he will, and then he'll fabricate some bullshit story to get the public to support it. I think that much should be clear by now.