Obrador 'inauguration' in Mexico

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

ReKz

Sicc OG
May 26, 2002
1,338
1
0
#1
Obrador 'inauguration' in Mexico

The defeated left-wing candidate in Mexico's presidential election, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, has held an unofficial swearing-in ceremony.

During his "inauguration" in Mexico City, Mr Lopez Obrador said he was launching a "parallel government".

He claims he was the victim of fraud in July's election - a view shared by millions of Mexicans.

But some of his supporters think his alternative inauguration is ill-advised and politically irresponsible.

In the presidential election, Mr Lopez Obrador was defeated by less than a percentage point by Felipe Calderon of the governing National Action Party (PAN).

He was sworn in by Senator Rosario Ibarra, a member of his party, who placed a red, green and white presidential sash across his shoulders.

"I swear to honour and fulfil the constitution as legitimate president," Mr Lopez Obrador told thousands of supporters in the Zocalo, Mexico City's main square.

Real support


Mr Lopez Obrador has promised he will do everything he can to hamper the government of Mr Calderon, who succeeds President Vicente Fox on 1 December.

"Those neo-fascist reactionaries better not think they'll have room to manoeuvre," he told his supporters on Saturday.

"We're going to keep them on a short leash."

Although Mr Lopez Obrador has enough of a support base to be able to create a mass civil disobedience movement, some analysts think that his campaign will be, at best, a thorn in the Mr Calderon's side.

The BBC's Americas editor Will Grant says many Mexicans are tired of conflict and long for a return to normality.

Some of Mr Lopez Obrador's advisors privately agree that it would be the politically expedient move, especially with an eye on any future presidential bid, our correspondent says.
 
Dec 25, 2003
12,356
218
0
70
#4
2-0-Sixx said:
Thanks for posting the article. I have no idea what kind of strategy this is or where it will take him and his supporters, but it should be very interesting to watch and see how things develop.
What if Obrador really did lose the vote?

Is this out of the realm of possibility?

Not to stir shit, just wondering.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
45
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#5
^^He didn't lose, it has been well documented (I posted numerous articles/pictures/videos in this forum in case you'd like to search).

VERY GOOD read below from a Socialists perspective, for those interested.

:::
:::

Hundreds of thousands gather for inauguration of legitimate president López Obrador

"Se ve, se siente, tenemos presidente”
Juan Guerrero, Mexico City

One hundred and forty-one days after the right-wing parties stole the presidential elections in Mexico, the popular protest movement, headed by the ex-presidential candidate, Andrés Manuel López Obrador (ALMO), was out in force, on 20 November, for its own inauguration ceremony, in the Zócalo, Mexico City`s main square.

Crowds gathered from 3pm onwards, and by the start of the ceremony, at five in the afternoon, one of the biggest central squares in the world filled to the brink. People who arrived late tried to follow events in neighbouring streets. The crowd, made up of members of the PRD (Partido de la Revolución Democrática (AMLO’s party), the PT (the workers’ party), a coalition partner of the PRD in the Por el Bien de Todos (For the good of all) alliance, and members of community organisations. They braved the cold and waited quietly for the arrival of AMLO, on the same day as the official anniversary of the historic Mexican Revolution.

That a multitude of more than 300,000 people occupied the square was a defiance of the right wing parties and the officially elected president Calderon. For months, the media predicted the death of the protest movement and the political bankruptcy of AMLO and the PRD. Straight after the stolen elections, AMLO called on his supporters to occupy the Zócalo and to make a tent city. For 48 days, the protesters camped in the square, protested throughout the country, and did everything in their power to reclaim the election which so clearly had been stolen from them. Now they where back in Zócalo in great numbers and the official anniversary celebrations, organised by the Fox government, disappeared into insignificance. Most official acts of remembrance were cancelled. The few impersonators of the Mexican Revolution’s heroes, Pancho Villa and Zapata, who showed up on horseback in other parts of the city (playing subservient roles in modern ceremonies of remembrance that are void of any real revolutionary significance) were an illustration of the helplessness of the ruling class rather than the usual sycophantic celebration with which the multi-millionaire robbers ruling Mexico try to claim some revolutionary antecedent.
The legitimate government is the organised people

When López Obrador appeared on the stage in the Zócalo the crowd started shouting slogans: “Es un honor de estar con Obrador” (‘It is an honour to be with Obrador’) and “Si se pudo” (‘Yes it could be done!’). The inauguration started with a proposal from the head of the National Democratic Convention, an organisation made up of the different parties in the Obrador alliance, and trade unions and community organisations. The proposal, arrived at through consultation with over one million delegates was to mobilise on 1 December, to protest against the fraudulent inauguration of Filipe Calderon. The speaker asked the multitude in the square if they agreed and were prepared to occupy the Zócalo, at 7 am, on 1 December. Immediately all hands were raised, as if it was the action of a single person.

Then the alternative government of 12 people (6 women and 6 men), was proposed to the crowd. After this, López Obrador was presented with a badge depicting an eagle, with spread wings and a snake in its beak. In his speech, Obrador referred to this symbol as the republican eagle, the symbol of the Juarez presidency, during the first Mexican Revolution. Obrador differentiated his symbol from the official symbol on the Mexican national flag, by shouting: “Down with the ugly eagle! Down with the eagle of the conservatives and the reactionaries of Mexico!”

Obrador’s went on to say: “It is a pleasure to see you standing here. To see the Zócalo filled again and vibrating with enthusiasm reaffirms what I have always thought: with people like you nothing is impossible. Here is the proof of what we are and of what we will be capable of building”.

The speech set out 20 programmatic points of the alternative government, points around which “a government of the people” will be organised, “the organisation of a most important civil movement that has ever existed in our history, we will built it from below - the political, economical, social and cultural transformation that Mexico needs”.

The biggest cheers arose when López Obrador attacked the ruling class and the present and future ‘official’ government of Mexico. “A government divorced from the people is nothing more than a facade, an egg shell, a bureaucratic apparatus; the legitimate government is the organised people”. He called for the setting up of a ‘truth commission’ to investigate the illegal enrichment and rampant corruption which accompanied the privatisation of former nationalised industries, and also to investigate the ‘old boys’ network’, the political parties and the corrupt practices around which government contracts are granted.

The first measure of his popular government, Obrador said, would be to “confront the economic monopolies” and to propose a “law on competitive prices” which will do away with “exaggerated prices the Mexicans pay for services and goods.”

He listed prices Mexican people pay and compared them with the prices a US citizen would pay for the same goods and services. “It is not acceptable that Mexicans pay 223% more for cement, 260% more for broad band internet, 65% more for telephone, 116% more for household electricity, 116% more for cable television and 26000% more charges for the use of a credit card”.

Other points in the 20 point programme, included free education, a national minimum wage enshrined in the constitution, protection of Mexican industry from international competition, rights for the indigenous people and all other minorities, no to privatisation, and yes to the protection of the national resources of the country

Obrador received the biggest cheer of the evening when he said a people oppressed could not be expected accept oppression peacefully. “When there is no justice, there can be no peace!” And he announced support for the rebellion in the Oaxaca region of Mexico, demanding the resignation of the state governor Ulises Ruiz, and the withdrawal of the militarised police from Oaxaca (see previous reports on socialistworld.net).
Break the power of the industrial barons and combat white collar crime

Obrador made references to the ‘barons’ of the Mexican economy, who enriched themselves during the neo-liberal policies of the de la Madrid, Salinas, Zedillo and Fox governments. In fact, as in other Latin American countries butchered by neo-liberalism, while the population suffered the “liberalisation” of the market, these policies created a few wealthy monopolists.

The 10 most important barons had, by 2005, amassed a fortune of 30 billion dollars or 5% of the Gross Domestic Product, a quarter of which is in the hands of the richest Mexican, Carlos Slim Helú, who is also ex-campaign leader of right wing presidential candidate Salinas.

Mr. Slim controls 94 percent of the telephone communication by landline and 75% of the mobile network. Lorenzo Zambrano, the cement king, controls 90% of the Mexican market, and his industrial group is third in cement production world wide. By the beginning of the process of privatisation, his personal wealth amounted to 55 billion pesos, and 5 years later he had tripled his fortune. Germán Larrea, the head of the industrial group Grupo México, owns 95% of the exploitation and trade of the copper industry. At the beginning of the Fox presidency, Germán Larrea’s net wealth was 700 millions pesos. By 2005 it had grown to 7.2 billion pesos. These monopolists made huge profits while poverty rates stayed the same or grew over the last decade. Between 43% to 51% of Mexicans live in poverty, and nearly 80% of all rural families live in poverty. Government aid is virtually non-existent or does not help. One newspaper recently reported that poor families in Oaxaca, Puebla, Hidalgo and Veracruz give government distributed baby food to their livestock animals because their children will not eat it.
The genie is out of the bottle

This radical left populist programme presented by Obrador has every chance to act as a catalyst and a propeller for the struggle of the Mexican masses. The PRD, while it is not a workers’ party in the sense that it defends the class interests of the working class, can for now be a force around which groups of struggling workers gather. While Obrador included in the 20 points the need to democratise the trade union movement, and supported secret ballots - a fundamental task for worker-activists, socialists and revolutionaries - he did not at all refer to democratising the PRD, the need for a workers and poor peasants’ government or the need to break with capitalism.

The radical demands put forward by Obrador will be supported by socialists and revolutionaries all over the world. However, in order to guarantee the implementation and sustainability of these reforms then the grip of the capitalist barons and reactionaries over the Mexican people, supported by imperialism, must be broken and along with it the capitalist system. The floodgates will open in Mexico, and in this struggle millions will stand side by side seeking a better life, a society more just and equal, and end to the carnivorous plundering of the tiny elite. Throughout this movement, revolutionary socialists will explain and point to the fundamental tasks the mass movement has to undertake, including the creation of a mass workers’ party, with democratically elected representatives on a workers’ wage and subject to recall. The unions need to be reclaimed and rebuilt. A programme of genuine democratic socialism calls for workers’ control and management, and the immediate implementation of an emergency plan to rebuild society.

A people can be subjected, exploited, and abused for a long time. Working people can try to make ends meet, bow their heads, and endure terrible suffering. However, exploiters be warned, once the masses seek change, to stand up and to fight for their rights, no multi-million dollar army can stop them, and no amount of repression will knock down the masses. In Mexico today, we are witnessing the first steps in this process.

http://www.socialistworld.net/
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
45
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#8
Even though Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador and the leaders of the popular uprising in Oaxaca failed to link their struggles together and call a general strike to prevent the neo-liberal Felipe Calderon from being sworn in as President of Mexico, Calderon's illegitimate presidency will continue to be dogged by mass protests of workers and peasants. A new chapter in the struggle of the Mexican masses began in 2006, and the flame will not be put out easily. Calderon's presidency is clearly seen by the masses as a government for the rich and U.S. imperialism.

This article below describes the first major wave of protests I've heard since Calderon was sworn in on December 1st. The article says these protests are being led by the unions and peasant organizations.

The radicalization and struggle against neo-liberalism continues to rise in Latin America, including in Mexico, which will have ramifications for the radicalization among Mexican and Latino immigrant workers here in the U.S. as well.

::
::

Thousands in Mexico City Protest Rising Food Prices
By ELISABETH MALKIN
Published: February 1, 2007

MEXICO CITY, Jan. 31 — Tens of thousands of workers and farmers filled this city’s central square on Wednesday to protest spiraling food prices, ratcheting up the volume over a problem that has dogged President Felipe Calderón in his first weeks in office.

Some protesters handed out ears of corn to workers and farmers who marched in Mexico City on Wednesday.
Left-wing parties joined the unions and peasant organizations that had called the protest. The protesters, some of whom handed out ears of corn, marched up Mexico City’s main avenue to the Zócalo, the site of protests through much of the summer and fall against Mr. Calderón’s election.

The high cost of tortillas and other food staples has consumed politics here over the past few weeks, posing a stubborn challenge to Mr. Calderón as he seeks to project an image as a take-charge leader. It has spilled into the ever-simmering debate here over the country’s commitment to free-market economics.

As marchers gathered at dusk in the city’s main square, a former television personality, Verónica Velasco, read a statement condemning the government’s policies. “While other countries are looking for alternatives to neoliberal policies, in Mexico, the government has lagged behind and insisted in applying a model that, after a quarter century, has shown its inefficiency and inequality,” the statement said.

As night fell, Andrés Manuel López Obrador, the leftist candidate who narrowly lost to Mr. Calderón in July, spoke to the crowd.

City officials would not give an estimate of the size of the protest.

To opponents of Mr. Calderón’s government, the spike in the price of tortillas is further proof that the free-market policies he has pledged to continue benefit the wealthy at the expense of the poor. The high prices are new ammunition for those who have previously pressed to renegotiate the agricultural chapter of the North American Free Trade Agreement to provide more protection for Mexican farmers, and for Mexico to end its dependence on imports of American corn and recover what nationalists call food sovereignty.

Mr. Calderón barely won a bitterly contested election in July against a leftist opponent who promised to roll back some of those policies. Aware that he would have to win over part of the population that has yet to see the benefits of free trade, Mr. Calderón quickly announced a series of social programs once he took office.

He also cracked down on the drug trade, establishing an image as a decisive executive. He ordered the army into several cities to fight drug violence and summarily extradited 11 drug trafficking suspects to the United States.

But the tortilla price spiral appeared to come as a surprise. Although Mr. Calderón moved quickly, announcing a pact on Jan. 18 to freeze prices, the problem has not been resolved.

Even with the pact, the news reports focused on the fact that the price ceiling for the tortillas of about 35 cents a pound was about 40 percent higher than the price three months earlier and contrasted that with the 4 percent increase in the minimum wage, which is still less than $5 a day.

But because fewer than 10 percent of tortilla producers signed on to the agreement, the government had little power over those who did not. In some areas, prices have risen to 45 cents a pound. There is little more that Mr. Calderón can do to contain prices without huge expenditures for subsidies. Most analysts agree that the main cause of the increase has been a spike in corn prices in the United States, as the demand for corn to produce ethanol has jumped.

But the uneven structure of Mexico’s corn and tortilla industry here has also generated accusations — none of them proved — of hoarding and profiteering. Mexico’s corn flour industry is controlled by just two companies, Grupo Maseca, also known as Gruma, and Minsa. Under the pact, Gruma agreed to keep prices for corn flour at 21 cents a pound. The government has promised to crack down on profiteers.

Ken Shwedel, an agricultural economist in Mexico City for the Dutch agribusiness bank Rabobank, said prices were likely to remain high in the United States, which supplies about 25 percent of Mexico’s corn.

“This is the first time you’ve got a real agricultural shock to the economy,” he said. “The market economy isn’t as benevolent as a state-run economy. The market is characterized by fluctuations. You have to live with it and know how to deal with it.”

The marchers clearly directed their blame at the government. “When they get involved in something as elemental as tortillas, well that’s just irresponsible,” said Francisco Ruiz, 48, a telephone worker.

Carola Ortega, 64, a member of a peasant group, said: “We’re here because the government always takes advantage of the poor. First it was tortillas, but we’re not stupid; if tortillas go up, everything else does too.”

Some analysts argue that the opposition has merely seized on a convenient issue and that the controversy will blow over.

“For the unions, it is about much more than tortillas,” said Vidal Romero, a political scientist at the Autonomous Technological Institute of Mexico, a Mexico City university. “They want to make it clear to the president that they still have strength and not let the government do what it wants.”

For the left, the tortilla issue is a new rallying cry after months of postelectoral protests. Mr. Romero said the left hoped to use the march to position itself as the main opposition force to Mr. Calderón’s presidency. “They want to draw oxygen from it,” he said.