New TIME Magazine Article on Hugo Chavez

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jan 9, 2004
3,340
131
0
43
#1
Tuesday, Jul. 05, 2005
Tracking Hurricane Hugo
Venezuela's President Chavez idolizes Castro, rails at Bush and leads Latin America's leftist wave
By TIM PADGETT/CARACAS

When Hugo Chávez, the President of Venezuela, talks about the Bush Administration, he does so with invective that can be both bellicose and sophomoric. Since he became President in 1999, Chávez has publicly, in Spanish, called Bush an a______who is trying to assassinate him. He has referred to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice as an "illiterate" who has a crush on him. Chávez often airs his attacks on Aló Presidente, a weekly, hours-long television call-in show from the Miraflores presidential palace in Caracas. His fulminations are such a hit with Venezuelan supporters that Chávez has broadened his audience. During a recent live broadcast, he exhorted people across the region to join his anti-U.S. campaign. "Latin America," he said, "is done kneeling to take orders from the White House."

Hearing that bluster, one might assume that Chávez fancies himself a 21st century Fidel Castro. Chávez does idolize Castro, rarely missing an opportunity to be seen with the Cuban leader--like last week, when, with Castro at his side, he announced a regional "solidarity" fund to give cash-strapped Caribbean countries cheaper access to Venezuelan oil. Although Chávez was democratically elected, he flirts with autocracy. And he indulges in Castroesque paranoia about the U.S.: This summer Venezuelan civilians are training alongside the army in antiaircraft and antitank warfare so they will be able to thwart the next Bay of Pigs.

Yet for all that, Chávez is not, so far, a dictator. But he has one thing that Castro did not, and that is why his rhetoric is being taken more seriously from the barrios of Caracas to the hallways of Washington. Chávez controls the hemisphere's largest oil reserves and is the U.S.'s fourth largest foreign supplier. As oil prices hit $60 per bbl. this summer, his government reaped a multibillion-dollar windfall. Chávez has used that, and his rising prestige in the region, to lead a political shift in Latin America that is buzzing like a Che Guevara souvenir convention. With the Bush Administration tied up in the global war on terrorism, Chávez and his allies have mounted an assault on U.S.-backed free-market reforms that are allegedly widening the gap between the region's rich and poor. Since Chávez was elected in 1998 (and again in a special 2000 election), leftist leaders like him have taken power or are leading voter polls in eight countries, including the two largest, Brazil and Mexico. The most recent domino to fall was Bolivia. Last month an uprising by indigenous citizens demanding the nationalization of the country's natural-gas reserves toppled the President, Bolivia's second to go in less than two years. Says Evo Morales, the rebellion's leftist leader, who is a favorite to win a presidential election later this year: "Chávez is our example."

There is so far no evidence that Chávez is financing the rippling revolts. But while the Bush Administration continues to regard Chávez as a "negative force," as Rice calls him, some U.S. officials feel it is time to stop dismissing him as a hothead with a dubious popular mandate--especially because he is likely to win another six-year term next year. Chávez "may be a radical," says a high-ranking U.S. official, "but he's a radical with deep pockets."

Chávez, 50, who led a failed coup in 1992--he still wears his red army beret at rallies--was elected on a wave of anger at Venezuela's epic corruption. Since then he has faced a coup attempt, a general strike and a recall referendum--all of which, he says, were aided by the U.S. But he survived them, thanks to an inept opposition and Venezuela's legions of poor, whose barrios now get schools, bodegas, potable water and free clinics. Chávez, who grew up in the poor rural state of Barinas, holds that base with his earthy and confrontational llanero (cowboy) touch. During last year's referendum campaign he employed a Venezuelan folk song in which a llanero beats the devil in a singing contest. Chávez cast himself as the llanero and Bush as Satan. "He has enormous communications talent," says Alberto Barrera, co-author of a biography of Chávez. "He has created his own populist myth, and the U.S. can't figure out how to discredit it."

The myth does deserve some puncturing. To U.S. and opposition critics, Chávez is a polarizing would-be dictator who has subordinated institutions like the courts. Thousands of public employees claim they were fired last year for signing petitions to recall Chávez, and his new media law contains a broad definition of slander that opponents say is meant to stifle dissent. Still, Venezuela's opposition can freely rail at Chávez. And it's harder for the U.S. to demonize Chávez as an oil autocrat when Washington's main oil ally, Saudi Arabia, has a far worse record.

Oil is the U.S.'s major anxiety. Chávez led the drive to raise crude prices by urging OPEC, of which Venezuela is a founding member, to rein in production. Venezuela's state-owned oil industry can't afford to cut off the U.S., but Chávez, to reduce dependence on the American market, is inking delivery deals with oil-thirsty giants China and India. That leads pols like Indiana Senator Richard Lugar to wonder if the U.S. can mitigate the effects of a possible Venezuelan shortfall. Oil analysts say Chávez may be pushing prices higher by dramatically raising taxes and royalties on U.S. and multinational oil firms, which in the 1990s received unusually generous contracts to help pump Venezuela's heavy crude. Such companies are "vultures watching meat," Chávez said last week. (The firms will not comment.)

Of course, his influence could dry up if oil prices fall. Like the profligate élite he defeated in 1998, he has presided over soaring increases in public spending. Nonetheless, unemployment remains high. However, Chávez prefers to play up the specter of U.S. aggression and how he will stand up to it. He says, for example, he will have to "reconsider" diplomatic relations with Washington if the U.S. does not extradite suspected terrorist Luis Posada Carriles, who is wanted in Venezuela for the 1976 bombing of a Cuban airliner that killed 73 people. Francisco Arias, a former army officer who took part with Chávez in the 1992 coup, says it is that doggedness that explains why, "for better or worse, people follow Hugo. They know he'll cross the Rubicon for them." And from now on, he's likely to make a bigger splash each time he does. --With reporting by Brian Ellsworth/Caracas
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
45
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#8
WHITE DEVIL said:
Where are the inaccuracies? What are your probs with it?
The article isnt really inaccurate, its just they way it is was written.

Chávez does idolize Castro
:rolleyes::rolleyes:

Yet for all that, Chávez is not, so far, a dictator.
Implying that he might be a dictator soon?

Time Magazine = Garbage

nefar559,

Henry R. Luce the founder of Time magazine was a great admirer of Hitler and of Mussolini (who appeared on the cover of Time five times as well) and he was himself a fascist.

He had this to say of Mussolini:

"America needs at this moment a moral leader, a national moral leader. The outstanding national moral leader of the world today is Mussolini." --March 1928

"A state reborn by virtue of Fascist symbols, Fascist rank and hence Fascist enterprise." --Nov 1930

"The moral force of Fascism, appearing in totally different forms in different nations, may be the inspiration for the next general march of mankind." --Apr 1934
 
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#9
i could go on and on . . .

TOKZTLI said:
TAnd he indulges in Castroesque paranoia about the U.S.:
Paranoia? The U.S. has invaded Cuba, officially attempted assassinations on Castro, chemically, biologically and conventionally bombed Cuba, and maintains a military base on the island.

The U.S. supported a coup in Venezuela, currently acts to subvert not only the government but key industry within the country, and is training anti-chavez paramilitary groups in florida and colombia.

How is either of them paranoid? Because they have been attacked before? Because they've been kidnapped or shot at or almost blown up before? Those 2 crazy wacky guys down there, so paranoid. :rolleyes:

That is straight up propaganda because it implies that none of that has happened and that there is no basis for suspicion of the U.S.’s actions towards these two countries and their leaders.

TOKZTLI said:
There is so far no evidence that Chávez is financing the rippling revolts.
:rolleyes: I wonder why?
 
Jan 9, 2004
3,340
131
0
43
#10
I understood it was propaganda when I read the title to the article.
It is sitll informative for those of us that dont follow Hugo's day-to-day events.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
45
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#11
This may be more informative, as far as what Chavez is actually duing in Venezuela.

:::
:::

The great class divide and the improvements underway
LINK

Even before I arrived in Venezuela for a recent visit, I encountered the great class divide in that country. On my connecting flight from Miami to Caracas, I found myself seated next to an exquisitely dressed Venezuelan woman. Judging from her prosperous aspect, I anticipated that she would take the first opportunity to hold forth against President Hugo Chavez. Unfortunately, I was right.

Our conversation moved along famously until we got to the political struggle going on in Venezuela. “Chavez,” she hissed, “is terrible, terrible.” He is “a liar.” He “fools the people” and is “ruining the country.”

She owns an upscale women’s fashion company with links to prominent firms in the United States. When I asked how Chavez has hurt her business, she said, “Not at all.” But many other businesses, she quickly added, have been irreparably damaged as has the whole economy. She went on denouncing Chavez in sweeping terms, warning me of the national disaster to come if this demon continued to have his way.

Other critics I encountered in Venezuela shared this same mode of attack: weak on specifics, but strong in venom, voiced with all the ferocity of those who fear that their birthright (that is, their class advantage) is under siege because others below them on the social ladder are now getting a slightly larger slice of the pie.

In Venezuela over 80 percent of the population lives below the poverty level. Before Chavez, most of the poor had never seen a doctor or dentist. Their children never went to school, since they could not afford the annual fees. The neoliberal market “adjustments” of the 1980s and 1990s only made things worse, cutting social spending and eliminating subsidies in consumer goods. Successive Administrations did nothing about the rampant corruption and nothing about the growing gap between rich and poor, the growing malnutrition and desperation.

Far from ruining the country, here are some of the good things the Chavez government has accomplished:

* A land reform program designed to assist small farmers and the landless poor has been instituted—this past March a large landed estate owned by a British beef company was occupied by agrarian workers for farming purposes
* Education is now free (right through to university level), causing a dramatic increase in grade school enrollment
* The government has set up a marine conservation program and is taking steps to protect the land and fishing rights of indigenous peoples
* Special banks now assist small enterprises, worker cooperatives, and farmers
* Attempts to further privatize the state-run oil industry—80 percent of which is still publicly owned—have been halted and limits have been placed on foreign capital penetration
* Chavez kicked out U.S. military advisors and prohibited overflights by U.S. military aircraft engaged in counterinsurgency in Colombia
* “Bolivarian Circles” have been organized throughout the nation, neighborhood committees designed to activate citizens at the community level to assist in literacy, education, vaccination campaigns, and other public services
* The government hires unemployed men, on a temporary basis, to repair streets and neglected drainage and water systems in poor neighborhoods

Then there is the health program. I visited a dental clinic in Chavez’s home state of Barinas. The staff consisted of four dentists, two of whom were young Venezuelan women. The other two were Cuban men who were there on a one-year program. The Venezuelan dentists noted that in earlier times dentists did not have enough work. There were millions of people who needed treatment, but care was severely rationed by one’s ability to pay. Dental care was distributed like any other commodity, not to everyone who needed it, but only to those who could afford it.

When the free clinic in Barinas first opened it was flooded with people seeking dental care. No one was turned away. Even opponents of the Chavez government availed themselves of the free service, temporarily putting aside their political aversions.

Many of the doctors and dentists who work in the barrio clinics (along with some of the clinical supplies and pharmaceuticals) come from Cuba. Chavez has also put Venezuelan military doctors and dentists to work in the free clinics. Meanwhile, much of the Venezuelan medical establishment is vehemently opposed to the free clinic program, seeing it as a Cuban communist campaign to undermine medical standards and physicians’ earnings. That low-income people are receiving medical and dental care for the first time in their lives does not seem to be a consideration that carries much weight among the more “professionally minded” practitioners.

I visited one of the government-supported community food stores that are located around the country, mostly in low income areas. These modest establishments sell canned goods, pasta, beans, rice, and some produce and fruits at well below market price, a blessing in a society with widespread malnutrition.

Popular food markets have eliminated the layers of middlepeople and made staples more affordable for residents. Most of these markets are run by women. The government also created a state-financed bank whose function is to provide low-income women with funds to start cooperatives in their communities.

There is a growing number of worker cooperatives. One in Caracas was started by turning a waste dump into a shoe factory and a T-shirt factory. Financed with money from the Petroleum Ministry, the coop has put about 1,000 people to work. The workers seem enthusiastic and hopeful.

Surprisingly, many Venezuelans know relatively little about the worker cooperatives. Or perhaps it’s not surprising, given the near monopoly that private capital has over the print and broadcast media. The wealthy media moguls, all vehemently anti-Chavez, own four of the five television stations and all the major newspapers.

The person most responsible for Venezuela’s revolutionary developments, Hugo Chavez, has been accorded the usual ad hominem treatment in the U.S. news media. An article in the San Francisco Chronicle described him as “Venezuela’s pugnacious president.” An earlier Chronicle report (November 30, 2001) quotes a political opponent who calls Chavez “a psychopath, a terribly aggressive guy.” The London Financial Times sees him as “increasingly autocratic” and presiding over something called a “rogue democracy.”

In the Nation (May 6, 2002), Marc Cooper—one of those Cold War liberals who nowadays regularly defends the U.S. empire—writes that the democratically-elected Chavez speaks “often as a thug,” who “flirts with megalomania.” Chavez’s behavior, Cooper rattles on, “borders on the paranoiac,” is “ham-fisted demagogy” acted out with an “increasingly autocratic style.” Like so many critics, Cooper downplays Chavez’s accomplishments and uses name-calling in place of informed analysis.

Other media mouthpieces have labeled Chavez “mercurial,” “besieged,” “heavy-handed,” “incompetent,” and “dictatorial,” a “barracks populist,” a “strongman,” a “firebrand,” and, above all, a “leftist.” It is never explained what “leftist” means.

A leftist is someone who advocates a more equitable distribution of social resources and human services and who supports the kinds of programs that the Chavez government is putting in place. (Likewise a rightist is someone who opposes such programs and seeks to advance the insatiable privileges of private capital and the wealthy few.) The term “leftist” is frequently bandied about in the U.S. media, but seldom defined. The power of the label is in its remaining undefined, allowing it to have an abstracted built-in demonizing impact, which precludes rational examination of its political content.

Meanwhile Chavez’s opponents, who staged an illegal and unconstitutional coup in April 2002 against the democratically elected government, are depicted in the U.S. media as champions of “pro-democratic” and “pro-West” governance. We are talking about the free-market plutocrats and corporate-military leaders of the privileged social order who killed more people in the 48 hours they held power in 2002 than were ever harmed by Chavez in his years of rule.

When one of these perpetrators, General Carlos Alfonzo, was hit with charges for the role he had played, the New York Times chose to call him a “dissident” whose rights were being suppressed by the Chavez government. Four other top military officers charged with leading the 2002 coup were also likely to face legal action. No doubt, they too will be described not as plotters or traitors who tried to destroy a democratic government, but as “dissidents,” decent individuals who are being denied their right to disagree with the government.

President Hugo Chavez, whose public talks I attended on three occasions, proved to be an educated, articulate, remarkably well-informed and well-read individual. He manifests a sincere dedication to effecting some salutary changes for the great mass of his people, a person who in every aspect seems worthy of the decent and peaceful democratic revolution he is leading. Millions of his compatriots correctly perceive him as being the only president who has ever paid attention to the nation’s poorest areas. No wonder he is the target of calumny and coup from the upper echelons in his own country and from ruling circles up north.

Chavez charges that the United States government is plotting to assassinate him. I can believe it.
 

Stealth

Join date: May '98
May 8, 2002
7,137
1,177
113
41
#12
I wouldn't exactly call it propoganda, per se. If you already hate Bush or are anti-american gov't, this article kicks ass:

After reading that he publically called Bush an asshole, I was like "wow, this guy is pretty cool". Haha.