NEVADA COMMISSION APPROVES INSTANT REPLAY

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Feb 7, 2006
13,049
2
0
42
#1
According to a new rule passed by the Nevada State Athletic Commission Wednesday, referees in Nevada now have the opportunity to get a second look at a fight’s end to determine its legality.

The final wording as passed: “A referee at the conclusion of a contest or exhibition stopped immediately due to an injury to an unarmed combatant pursuant to NAC 467.718 and after making a decision, may view a replay if available in order to determine whether the injury in question was caused a legal blow or a foul.”

The rule addresses several controversial stoppages in recent history where a fighter lost a contest because the referee couldn’t see an injury that forced a bout’s stoppage.

A referee may now use instant replay to determine whether the action that caused the injury was legal or a foul and make a decision on the fight’s result. Only a referee can decide whether to order a replay.

In one of the most prominent examples of the need to address injury stoppages, UFC welterweight Anthony Johnson was unintentionally poked in the eye by Kevin Burns at UFC Fight Night 14 last July and was denied an appeal to his TKO loss due to the commission’s “lack of remedy” on the incident.

After a discussion on the issues surrounding the new rule, the five-member commission passed it by unanimous vote. NSAC Executive Director Keith Kizer told MMAWeekly.com the rule could take effect in as early as 30 days.
 
Sep 24, 2006
2,168
145
63
41
#3
i kinda agree to a point i think if its ended by injury then it should be ok to look but i dont think it should be the ref who looks they should have a panel of like 3 current or former fighters look and decide because they have experience in being in that situation and would know whether or not the injury was the cause and on purpose
 
Jan 2, 2004
3,168
2
0
40
#4
Lol. Kinda pointless to hire three former fighters every show in the slim chance a fight ends in a foul and they go to replay... Do you want like the scene from dodgeball where chuck norris gives the thumbs up??

Referees are neutral. And they're paid to judge fouls. Let them look and do there jobs.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
45
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#5
this applies for boxing as well. A recent example is Nate Campbell vs Timothy Bradly. Campbell was took a nasty headbutt to the eye and the ref ruled the cut was caused by a punch and Campbell lost the fight by TKO when it really should have been a No Contest.
 
Jul 29, 2008
3,400
1
0
75
#6
shit.. hella people be getting eye poked... so this is good IMO.

with open gloves.. shit is bound to happen, even by accident. But determinding a win or lose is a big deal.
 
May 2, 2002
7,458
1,028
0
45
#7
The ref should already be watchin' close enough to catch an infraction.

Really the only time they ever show a replay is at the conclusion of a fight (KO/TKO/Sub). Or if its blatantly obvious (knee to the groin, inadvertent eye poke), in which case the ref should have the fight stopped momentarily and make each fighter go back to his respective corner.

Who knows, instant replay just might be good.